<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Urban Review STL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com</link>
	<description>A look at public policy, urban planning and related politics in the St. Louis region. Established 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The End Of The Hodiamont Streetcar Right-of-Way</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/the-end-of-the-hodiamont-streetcar-right-of-way/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/the-end-of-the-hodiamont-streetcar-right-of-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History/Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streetcars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forty-six years ago today the last streetcar in St. Louis stopped rolling down the streets. The Hodiamont was St. Louis&#8217; last streetcar line. The Hodiamont ran in city streets from downtown to just west of Vandeventer Ave where it went into its own private right-of-way. ABOVE: The streetcar tracks come out ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forty-six years ago today the last streetcar in St. Louis stopped rolling down the streets. The Hodiamont was St. Louis&#8217; last streetcar line. The Hodiamont ran in city streets from downtown to just west of Vandeventer Ave where it went into its own private right-of-way.</p>
<div id="attachment_20591" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20591" title="hodiamont1" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/hodiamont1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Looking east on the last eastern section of the Hodiamont Right-of-Way</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20592" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20592" title="hodiamont2" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/hodiamont2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Hodiamont ROW ends</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20593" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20593" title="hodiamont4" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/hodiamont4.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Cole School was built in 1936</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20594" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/unitedrailways.jpeg" target="_blank"><img class=" wp-image-20594  " title="unitedrailways" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/unitedrailways.jpeg" alt="" width="500" height="304" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: In 1909 the site was home to United Railways that owned the Hodiamont line. Click imaged to view larger version. Source: UM Digital Library Sanborn Maps Collection</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20597" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20597" title="hodiamont3" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/hodiamont3.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: The streetcar tracks come out of the private right-of-way and head east on Enright Ave</p></div>
<p>ABOVE: The streetcar tracks come out of the private right-of-way and head east on Enright Ave</p>
<p>Eventually new rubber-tire buses with air-conditioning  replaced  the older streetcars:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Only three lines were left in April 1964, when the new Bi-State agency winnowed the system to the Hodiamont line, which ran from downtown to the Wellston Loop. Along the way through north St. Louis, the Hodiamont had its own right-of-way, like a railroad. (</em><a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_3656e70d-0610-5592-90bc-7deebd14331f.html#ixzz1v9ocZPze"><em>STLtoday.com</em></a><em> article from 2010 &#8212; recommended)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but wonder if running a new modern streetcar through this right of way today would make sense. Or even a bus line?</p>
<p>&#8211; Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/the-end-of-the-hodiamont-streetcar-right-of-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: How Should The St. Louis Region Respond To The Rams?</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/poll-how-should-the-st-louis-region-respond-to-the-rams/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/poll-how-should-the-st-louis-region-respond-to-the-rams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 10:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics/Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STL Region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekly Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Jones Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Rams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CVC has until June 1 to accept or reject the Rams&#8217; proposal: The Rams&#8217; proposal was released against their wishes on Monday, a response to the dome improvement plan submitted by their landlord, the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission, in February. And the discrepancy is wide: The CVC ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_20569" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-20569" title="ramsproposal2" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ramsproposal2-300x184.png" alt="" width="300" height="184" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Dome would be expanded across the existing Broadway and Baer Plaza</p></div>
<p>The CVC has until June 1 to accept or reject the Rams&#8217; proposal:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Rams&#8217; proposal was released against their wishes on Monday, a response to the dome improvement plan submitted by their landlord, the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission, in February. And the discrepancy is wide: The CVC plan called for $124 million in upgrades, 52% of which would be paid for by the Rams; the team&#8217;s plan called for a complete overhaul estimated by the city to cost more than $700 million, and it wasn&#8217;t clear how it would be funded. (<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/rams/story/2012-05-14/Edward-Jones-Dome-renovations/54960266/1" target="_blank">USAtoday.com</a>)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>My post from Tuesday is <a title="Rams Proposal For Edward Jones Dome Calls For Significant Changes To Structure And Broadway" href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/rams-proposal-for-edward-jones-dome-calls-for-significant-changes-to-structure-and-broadway/" target="_blank">here</a>, it includes a link to the proposal. Who holds the cards in the negotiations?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Los Angeles is really the only viable remaining market in North America that would potentially support an NFL team and help the league generate greater revenues. If they don’t build a facility, or if they do but another franchise beats Kroenke to the punch, then Kroenke’s negotiating leverage versus the CVC will be weakened. (<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/prishe/2012/05/16/assessing-the-rams-renovation-negotiations-for-the-edward-jones-dome/" target="_blank">Forbes</a>)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Well we&#8217;ve got great negotiators here in St. Louis! We got the Kiel Opera House 20 years ago and that vibrant Ballpark Village in 2006. Oh wait&#8230;</p>
<p>The poll this week asks how the St. Louis region, via the CVC, should respond. I say we wish them well wherever it is they move after the 2014 season.</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/poll-how-should-the-st-louis-region-respond-to-the-rams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading: St. Louis Parks by NiNi Harris and Esley Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/reading-st-louis-parks-by-nini-harris-and-esley-hamilton/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/reading-st-louis-parks-by-nini-harris-and-esley-hamilton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esley Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NiNi Harris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The St. Louis region is home to many great parks and now historians (and personal friends) NiNi Harris and Esley Hamilton have collaborated on a book about parks in St. Louis city &#38; county, respectively. The title, appropriately enough, St. Louis Parks. The forward is by Peter H. Raven and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The St. Louis region is home to many great parks and now historians (and personal friends) NiNi Harris and Esley Hamilton have collaborated on a book about parks in St. Louis city &amp; county, respectively. The title, appropriately enough, St. Louis Parks.</p>
<div id="attachment_20578" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.reedypress.com/book.php?show=9781935806097" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-20578 " title="stlouisparkscover" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/stlouisparkscover.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="386" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Cover of the new hardcover book from Reedy Press, click image for publisher&#39;s page</p></div>
<p>The forward is by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_H._Raven" target="_blank">Peter H. Raven</a> and the 164 page book is filled with beautiful images by photographers  Mark Abeln and Steve Tiemann.</p>
<div id="attachment_20580" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20580" title="fairgroundspark.markabeln" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/fairgroundspark.markabeln.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Image of Fairgrounds Park by Mark Abeln</p></div>
<p>The wealth of knowledge that both Harris &amp; Hamilton have shared is overwhelming. NiNi Harris shared this thought with me:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>I love showing visitors to St. Louis around our City Parks. They are always awed by the beauty of our parks. And they are wowed by the number of parks, the variety of sizes from pocket parks to enormous Forest Park, from pedestrian parks to driving parks, from squares to linear parks. Hopefully, this book can help more people discover and enjoy this remarkable treasure.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Look for it in the library or your local bookstore.</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/reading-st-louis-parks-by-nini-harris-and-esley-hamilton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beautiful Detailing On Older Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/beautiful-detailing-on-older-infrastructure/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/beautiful-detailing-on-older-infrastructure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 10:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History/Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning & Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of you have probably driven under the railroad tracks while traveling on Chippewa St between Gravois Ave and Meramec. If you&#8217;re like me you never paid much attention to the design of the underpass. But earlier this month I was on a MetroBus heading westbound on Chippewa and it ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of you have probably driven under the railroad tracks while traveling on Chippewa St between Gravois Ave and Meramec.</p>
<div id="attachment_19010" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-19010" title="chippewaunderpass" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/chippewaunderpass.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Chippewa going under the railroad tracks</p></div>
<p>If you&#8217;re like me you never paid much attention to the design of the underpass. But earlier this month I was on a MetroBus heading westbound on Chippewa and it had to stop at the light at Meremac (<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Chippewa+St+at+Meramec+Ave+63116&amp;hl=en&amp;sll=38.590175,-90.261794&amp;sspn=0.008,0.013336&amp;t=h&amp;hnear=Chippewa+St+%26+Meramec+St,+St+Louis,+Missouri+63116&amp;z=17" target="_blank">aerial</a>) and there was the railing right next to the bus window.</p>
<div id="attachment_20557" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20557" title="chippewarailing" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chippewarailing.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Close up of railing on Chippewa at Meramec</p></div>
<p>I love the detail, so much more interesting than today&#8217;s infrastructure. Seems we either get boring stuff with zero detail or over the top designs. I&#8217;d much rather see a nice balance.</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/beautiful-detailing-on-older-infrastructure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chouteau Bridge Sidewalk Cracked, Pedestrians Detoured Slightly</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/chouteau-bridge-sidewalk-cracked-pedestrians-detoured-slightly/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/chouteau-bridge-sidewalk-cracked-pedestrians-detoured-slightly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning & Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walkability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chouteau Ave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidewalk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chouteau bridge (aerial) between 39th and Vandeventer opened on January 19, 2007 (source). The project to replace the old bridge was estimated at $16 million and &#8220;the construction contract was awarded to KCI Construction Company for $11.7 million.&#8221; Knowing the bridge wasn&#8217;t very old I was surprised recently when I ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chouteau bridge (<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Chouteau+Ave+%26+Central+Industrial+Dr+St+Louis,+MO+63110&amp;hl=en&amp;t=h&amp;hnear=Chouteau+Ave+%26+Central+Industrial+Dr,+St+Louis,+Missouri+63110&amp;z=17" target="_blank">aerial</a>) between 39th and Vandeventer opened on January 19, 2007 (<a href="http://www.modot.gov/stlouis/major_projects/chouteaubridgereplacement.htm" target="_blank">source</a>). The project to replace the old bridge was estimated at $16 million and &#8220;the construction contract was awarded to KCI Construction Company for $11.7 million.&#8221;</p>
<p>Knowing the bridge wasn&#8217;t very old I was surprised recently when I saw barricades on the south edge, then I received a press release from MoDOT:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>ST. LOUIS &#8211; The Missouri Department of Transportation will close Chouteau Avenue (Route 100) between Vandeventer and Spring in both directions for periods of up to 10 minutes starting at 10 p.m. Tuesday, May 8. All lanes will be open by 6 a.m. Wednesday, May 9.</em></p>
<p><em>Crews are conducting load testing on the bridge to determine the best way to fix the sidewalk. The sidewalk has been closed since mid-2011. (<a href="http://www.modot.org/stlouis/news_and_information/District6Release.shtml?action=displaySSI&amp;newsId=167699" target="_blank">MoDOT</a>)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Fix a sidewalk on a five year-old bridge?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>BIke/Walk Alert &#8211; Chouteau bridge between Vandeventer and 39th St.: During a recent inspection, MODOT found a crack in the sidewalk on the Chouteau Bridge and has closed the sidewalk while they investigate if the bridge is safe. MODOT plans to close one eastbound lane of Chouteau between Vandeventer and 39th and separate it from traffic with a concrete barrier. This lane will be a shared bike and pedestrian path until the sidewalk is repaired. Until the concrete barriers are in place, please use extreme caution when crossing the Chouteau Bridge or select an alternate route. Trailnet will post updates as we become aware of them. (<a href="https://www.facebook.com/Trailnet/posts/10150353253062759" target="_blank">Trailnet Facebook post</a> on November 1, 2011)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>With the barriers it&#8217;s possible to cross the bridge, although meeting someone in the middle would be a problem.</p>
<div id="attachment_20521" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20521 " title="chouteaubridge1" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chouteaubridge1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Looking east at the point where the sidewalk has been detoured</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20523" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20523" title="chouteaubridge2" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chouteaubridge2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Paint on the new sidewalk in part of the outside drive lane</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20524" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20524" title="chouteaubridge3" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chouteaubridge3.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Markings and holes after the recent testing</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20526" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20526" title="chouteaubridge4" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chouteaubridge4.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Looking toward he main part of the bridge is west of Central Industrial Drive</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20527" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20527" title="chouteaubridge5" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chouteaubridge5.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Under the main span</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20529" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20529" title="chouteaubridge6" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chouteaubridge6.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: The sidewalk along the shorter span to the east is also closed so it must have a crack as well</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20530" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20530" title="chouteaubridge7" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/chouteaubridge7.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Looking west at the edge of the eastern span</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve not seen anything since the recent testing to indicate a solution. MoDOT hasn&#8217;t responded to my inquiry. Did Missouri get a warranty on this bridge?</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/chouteau-bridge-sidewalk-cracked-pedestrians-detoured-slightly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Readers On Library Use</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/readers-on-library-use/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/readers-on-library-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis County Library]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week readers responding to the poll indicated their use of the public library: Q: How frequently do you, or an immediate family member, use the public library? Weekly 41 [33.06%] Monthly 27 [21.77%] A few times a year 20 [16.13%] Rarely 19 [15.32%] Never 10 [8.06%] Daily 6 [4.84%] ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-20543" title="library.naturalbridge" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/library.naturalbridge-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" />Last week readers responding to the poll indicated their use of the public library:</p>
<blockquote><p>Q: How frequently do you, or an immediate family member, use the public library?</p>
<ul>
<li>Weekly 41 [33.06%]</li>
<li>Monthly 27 [21.77%]</li>
<li>A few times a year 20 [16.13%]</li>
<li>Rarely 19 [15.32%]</li>
<li>Never 10 [8.06%]</li>
<li>Daily 6 [4.84%]</li>
<li>Other: 1 [0.81%] &#8211; &#8220;2 &#8211; 3 x weekly, various branches&#8221;</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s good that just 8% indicated they never use their public library. I wasn&#8217;t sure what to expect, weekly was the answer with the most responses, followed by monthly. When the central library reopens this year I&#8217;ll be there often hopefully. The original post is <a title="Poll: How Often Do You Use The Public Library?" href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/poll-how-often-do-you-use-the-public-library/">here</a>.</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/readers-on-library-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rams Proposal For Edward Jones Dome Calls For Significant Changes To Structure And Broadway</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/rams-proposal-for-edward-jones-dome-calls-for-significant-changes-to-structure-and-broadway/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/rams-proposal-for-edward-jones-dome-calls-for-significant-changes-to-structure-and-broadway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning & Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics/Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Jones Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Rams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised, Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster released the confidential proposal from the St. Louis Rams to the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission (CVC). To Whom It May Concern: In compliance with Chapter 610, the Missouri Sunshine Law, Attorney General Chris Koster made the following documents publicly available in ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As promised, <a href="http://ago.mo.gov" target="_blank">Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster </a>released the confidential proposal from the St. Louis Rams to the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission (CVC).</p>
<blockquote><p><em>To Whom It May Concern:</em></p>
<p><em>In compliance with Chapter 610, the Missouri Sunshine Law, Attorney General Chris Koster made the following documents publicly available in response to various media inquiries and Sunshine requests regarding ongoing negotiations between the </em><em>St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission and its lessee.</em></p>
<p><em>Respectfully,</em></p>
<p><em>CHRIS KOSTER</em></p>
<p><em>Attorney General</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Their proposal is significantly different than what the CVC had proposed. To me it seems like a new facility given how much would be entirely new.</p>
<div id="attachment_20566" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20566" title="ramsproposal1" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ramsproposal1.png" alt="" width="500" height="536" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Plan calls for removing most existing seating and the roof, moving the field 51&#39;-8&quot; to the east</p></div>
<div id="attachment_20569" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-20569" title="ramsproposal2" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ramsproposal2.png" alt="" width="500" height="308" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Dome would be expanded across the existing Broadway and Baer Plaza</p></div>
<p>This means the dome is getting significantly larger than it is currently. The near corner of the drawing above includes access to the casino tunnel. The 2010 image below shows you where that is currently:</p>
<div id="attachment_19065" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-19065" title="baerplazaaug2010" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/baerplazaaug2010.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: Baer Plaza with the Lumiere Link entrance in the foreground</p></div>
<p>As you can see that&#8217;s a lot of new building. Clearly the Rams want more than the lipstick the CVC proposed (see <a title="CVC Plan To Improve Dome Improves Broadway" href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/02/cvc-plan-to-improve-dome-improves-broadway/" target="_blank">CVC Plan To Improve Dome Improves Broadway</a>).</p>
<p>This brings up several thoughts:</p>
<ol>
<li>Perfect excuse to make 4th &amp; Broadway each two-way rather than the current one-way configurations</li>
<li>This would work well with the boulevard replacement of the I-70 elevated lanes, see <a href="http://www.citytoriver.org/" target="_blank">CitytoRiver.org</a></li>
<li>Unlikely the St, Louis region is going to pony up the money for this.</li>
</ol>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the proposal in detail yet. You can read the proposal <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/93525819/Rams-Dome-Proposal" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/rams-proposal-for-edward-jones-dome-calls-for-significant-changes-to-structure-and-broadway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri Transportation Meetings Not Accessible Via Transit</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/missouri-transportation-meetings-not-accessible-via-transit/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/missouri-transportation-meetings-not-accessible-via-transit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics/Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoDOT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missouri wants your input into our future transportation needs: Missouri House Speaker Steve Tilley recently formed a Blue Ribbon Citizens Committe on Missouri’s Transportation needs which will be holding public meetings across the state in the next several weeks. The committee is being chaired by Rod Jetton and Bill McKenna, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-18078" title="MoDOT" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/MoDOT-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" />Missouri wants your input into our future transportation needs:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Missouri House Speaker Steve Tilley recently formed a Blue Ribbon Citizens Committe on Missouri’s Transportation needs which will be holding public meetings across the state in the next several weeks. The committee is being chaired by Rod Jetton and Bill McKenna, and they will be looking at total transportation needs in the state. (Source: <a href="http://cmt-stl.org/missouri-blue-ribbon-citizens-committee-on-transportation-needs-formed/" target="_blank">CMT-STL</a>)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The first such meeting is at 1pm today at <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=14301+South+Outer+40+Road,+Chesterfield,+MO+63017&amp;hl=en&amp;ll=38.64121,-90.5133&amp;spn=0.007995,0.013336&amp;sll=38.641174,-90.514278&amp;sspn=0.002007,0.003334&amp;geocode=FXd7TQIdopqf-in1pwPTP7PYhzHD7y7tXZm-rA%3BFaKWTQIdr-ma-imB9R5lRtPYhzEqgkMWNSBYvw&amp;t=h&amp;dirflg=r&amp;ttype=now&amp;noexp=0&amp;noal=0&amp;sort=def&amp;hnear=14301+S+Outer+40,+Chesterfield,+Missouri+63017&amp;z=17&amp;start=3" target="_blank">14301 South Outer 40 Road, Chesterfield, MO 63017</a>. I&#8217;d like to attend but guess what, I can&#8217;t physically get there &#8212; at least not safely. I can get close after an hour or so ride on MetroBus but getting from the bus stop into the building safely looks impossible. The following is from a MoDOT Customer Relations Manager:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;One of the presenters at this meeting also uses a wheelchair and I know he will address the importance of access as the committee considers the transportation needs of Missourians. The area that you&#8217;re referencing is not a state road but I am familiar with it. I believe the bus stops at a paved shoulder then there&#8217;s a sidewalk and crosswalk across the street from the meeting site.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Most likely the presenter will drive, or be driven, to the meeting. A shoulder? They expect me to get off the bus onto the shoulder of Woods Mill Rd? The few sidewalks that exist don&#8217;t have  curb cuts and their scarcity means I&#8217;d be a sitting target on the roads or in parking lots. I don&#8217;t expect the Blue Ribbon Panel to understand since most represent businesses/industries that profit from keeping Missouri locked into the auto culture:</p>
<blockquote><p>Committee members include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Mr. Ben Jones, Union Pacific Railroad</li>
<li>Mr. Blake Hurst, Missouri Farm Bureau</li>
<li>Mr. Estil Fretwell, Missouri Farm Bureau</li>
<li>Mr. Brian Meisel, Lake of the Ozarks Economic Development Council</li>
<li>Mr. Duane Michie, First State Bank and Trust</li>
<li>Mr. Joe DeLong, DeLong’s Inc.</li>
<li>Mr. Len Toenjes, AGC of St. Louis</li>
<li>Mr. Neal St. ONge, Coldwell BAnker</li>
<li>Mr. Rick Neubert, Delta Concrete Inc.</li>
<li>MR. Tom Crawford, Missouri Trucking Association</li>
<li>Mr. Tony Thompson, Kwame Construction</li>
<li>Mr. Dan Mehan, Missouri Chamber of Commerce</li>
<li>Mr. Ed DeSoignie, The Heavy Constructors Association of Greater Kansas City</li>
<li>Mr. Jim Anderson, Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce</li>
<li>Mr. John Nations, Metro</li>
<li>Mr. MArk Stidham, Dexter City Adminstrator</li>
<li>Mr. Randy Verkamp, Phelps County Presiding Commissioner</li>
<li>Mr. Scott Smith, HNTB Corporation</li>
<li>Mr. Tom Dunne, Fred Weber, Inc.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>The list is from <a href="http://cmt-stl.org/missouri-blue-ribbon-citizens-committee-on-transportation-needs-formed/" target="_blank">CMT</a>.</p>
<p>The other meetings are:</p>
<ul>
<li>May 21 – MoDOT Northwest District Office, St. Joseph, MO</li>
<li>June 1 – Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce, Springfield, MO</li>
<li>June 29 – Show-Me Center, Cape Girardeau, MO</li>
<li>July 9 – ARC City Activity Center, Columbia, MO</li>
<li>July 23 – MoDOT Northeast District Office, Hannibal, MO</li>
<li>August 6 – Gamber Center, Lee’s Summit, MO</li>
</ul>
<p>I doubt I could get to any of these safely.</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/missouri-transportation-meetings-not-accessible-via-transit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: City Justified In Clearing Out Homeless Camps?</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/poll-city-justified-in-clearing-out-homeless-camps/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/poll-city-justified-in-clearing-out-homeless-camps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 10:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Downtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics/Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a couple of years some homeless had set up camp near the riverfront. But that&#8217;s changing: Hopeville was the second of three riverfront camps that the city plans to clear by May 18. The first, Dignity Harbor, was bulldozed last week. Officials said they have offered housing vouchers to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a couple of years some homeless had set up camp near the riverfront. But that&#8217;s changing:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Hopeville was the second of three riverfront camps that the city plans to clear by May 18. The first, Dignity Harbor, was bulldozed last week. Officials said they have offered housing vouchers to residents of all the camps so they can stay in hotels and apartments. (<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/hopeville-homeless-camp-in-st-louis-comes-down/article_aea3bcd8-9b9e-11e1-b5ab-001a4bcf6878.html#ixzz1ufdWn09f" target="_blank">STLtoday.com</a> on 5/11/2012)</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I visited Hopeville last year and while I was sympathetic to their situation I was also repulsed by what I saw.</p>
<div id="attachment_14879" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-14879" title="hopeville04" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/hopeville04.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="371" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: The &quot;Hopeville&quot; camp in June 2011</p></div>
<p>The poll this week asks if the city was justified in clearing out these camps. The poll is in the right sidebar below the advertisement.</p>
<p>- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/poll-city-justified-in-clearing-out-homeless-camps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grouphug St. Louis 2011 Was A Blast, 2012 Should Be Too</title>
		<link>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/grouphug-st-louis-2011-was-a-blast-2012-should-be-too/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/grouphug-st-louis-2011-was-a-blast-2012-should-be-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Patterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events/Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grouphug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanreviewstl.com/?p=20466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the funnest events I participated in last year was Grouphug St. Louis: Same as last year: we are asking you and your friends to scour the city for your favorite people, places, and objects—ones that define our city and/or help to explain why you love St. Louis—and HUG ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the funnest events I participated in last year was <a href="http://grouphugstl.tumblr.com/event" target="_blank">Grouphug St. Louis</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Same as last year: we are asking you and your friends to scour the city for your favorite people, places, and objects—ones that define our city and/or help to explain why you love St. Louis—and HUG these subjects for the camera. Get a friend to snap a photograph of you with your arms wrapped around your favorite St. Louis building, business, monument, person, etc. On May 26, all participants and friends are invited to attend the Grouphug party to view pics, imbibe, listen to music and express your love for St. Louis.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The creativity on display in the images and energy at the event was electrifying!</p>
<div id="attachment_16348" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-16348  " title="grouphug 2011" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">ABOVE: A huge crowd at STL-Style watched the slide show, June 2011</p></div>
<p>The following are the 2011 top three (click to view larger image):</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug3.png" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16350" title="grouphug#3" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug3.png" alt="" width="500" height="687" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug2.png" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16351" title="grouphug#2" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug2.png" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug1.png" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-16353" title="grouphug#1" src="http://urbanreviewstl.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grouphug1.png" alt="" width="500" height="348" /></a>But the name is Grouphug &#8212; the organizers would like to see some group images:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>We strongly encourage you to get with your neighbors and represent your neighborhood. Whether it’s Fox Park or Ferguson, the Hill or the Ville—we’d love to see you and your neighbors’ take on what represents your neighborhoods (involving hugs of course!).</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">Click <a href="http://grouphugstl.tumblr.com/post/22724847672/represent-your-neighborhood-for-grouphug-st-louis" target="_blank">here</a> for an example of a group Grouphug image. Submission deadline is 5pm Wednesday May 23rd and the big event is Saturday May 26th 7pm-10pm (<a href="http://grouphugstl.tumblr.com/event" target="_blank">details</a>).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">- Steve Patterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanreviewstl.com/2012/05/grouphug-st-louis-2011-was-a-blast-2012-should-be-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

