St. Louis To Consolidate Some Offices at Former Federal Office Building
Last Friday I posted that I wanted to see the city consolidate various offices into the vacated Municipal Courts building next to city hall. Monday I get a call from John Farrell, Public Information Officer for Comptroller Darlene Green, asking if I had time for a quick meeting. I met with Farrell and James Garavaglia, the Asset Manager in Green’s office.
While they all like the Municipal Courts building they say the cost of the necessary repairs are beyond the city’s budget constraints. Unlike city hall, the Municipal Courts building has not had the incremental upgrades to the electrical service and other systems. Garavaglia said in the last year the building was in operation they had fans blowing on the electrical panels to cool them down.
So when the federal courts moved to their new courthouse the shift began — the city bought the former federal courts building, leaving the old Municipal Courts building vacant. But, at that time, the talk was of a renewed Kiel Opera House with the Municipal Courts serving as a hotel and restaurant space to the east and the Abram federal building becoming a parking garage.
Above: The Abram building as seen from where 16th street used to be, now poorly maintained “open space.”
A couple of issues have come up since then. One, developer Breckenridge died a year ago and it turns out the Abram building is not well suited for a parking garage. Plan B? Consolidate offices from other buildings including the traffic/housing courts on Olive at 15th and the Health Department from North Grand.
Not as ideal as the Municipal Courts — an attractive building adjacent to City Hall. Still, having offices in the Abram is better than using is strictly for daily car storage — we have enough garages already. Sadly, it is really a tragic building from an urban perspective.
It occupies an entire city block yet has only one public entrance — which is set back from the street atop a platform accessed only from opposite ends. The building overhang is suitable space for smokers to stay out of the rain but little else.
Above we can see the little bit of 15th street before it is cut off for the Scottrade Center, with the Abram on the right and the long-closed Kiel Opera House on the left.
From the above vantage point we can see the rest of the field — in the foreground is the vacant Kiel, then the vacant Municipal Courts, the tall building is the new federal courthouse, the dark lower building with the red roof being city hall and behind it, the old federal courthouse now used for state court as well as some city offices.
So where does leave the Municipal Courts building? In July Jake Wagman of the Post-Dispatch did a story on the city’s hope to sell the building. Following that story, says Farrell and Garavaglia was interest from local and out of town developers. The developers that expressed an interest were given an RFP. Garavaglia expects responses early in January. Working with the Slay administration, Comptroller Green hopes to be able to select one of the proposals to sell the building.
At issue for any developer is figuring out ADA access. Such access is currently through a back entrance as the front steps are much to great for a reasonable ramp. Once inside I’m told the original (and historic bathrooms) have steps up into them. Other areas of the building include a number of steps as well.
The eventual purchaser will also get basically the land the building sits on. The parking to the south is a city owned lot. However, I’m told the Treasurer’s Office which manages parking for the city, is open to working with a developer on the construction of a shared new adjacent garage.
Funny how a city that has seen its rebirth based on the renovation of old buildings cannot manage to renovate one of it’s own. A civic gem goes private while we as a city get the abysmal Abram.
Couldn’t the building be listed on the National Register?
I actually think it’s a great idea, epecially as a taxpayer and someone who believes that recycling and reuse is a good thing. Yes, the existing structure is not “great” architecture (but I’ve seen a lot worse). It’s a child of its time and appears to be a functional structure. But, based on your description, it meets the needs of city government on many levels. The systems work. The building is easy to secure. It’s friendly to people with disabilities. It’s located close to other government functions. It’s flexible. It’s close to public transit. The price is right. It keeps workers in the core downtown area.
.
What this doesn’t do is keep a public use in the Municipal Courts Building. I don’t have a real problem with that IF (and that’s a big IF) a viable private use can be found to preseve the structure. It’s a beautful building, but it’s also hard to justify housing government workers in expensive, inefficient space. We struggle with the budget every year. Office space is overhead – much better to keep it contained and spend money on the actual delivery of services, instead of spending tax dollars on marble johns and high ceilings and leaky windows and new electrical service . . .
With Kiel and Municipal Courts remaining vacant it gives that stretch of downtown an Athen’s Acropolis look or Rome’s roman ruins; artifacts of some earlier culture. Is there an attitude of optimism out there that if the city were to gain 100,000 residents then that government office space would be necessary again? It seems like this topic could be closely related to the Gateway Mall if anything comes out of that. I really like that 4th pic looking east especially knowing the reality computer aided design tools had not been used for those first 4 buildings.
the whole “civic center” should be listed in the national register as a district – civil courts, fed courts, city hall, muni courts, kiel, soldier’s memorial and library. kiel is already listed, but the others are not.
Maybe Slay is holding onto the building from being sold, so he can open his Charter School there?
Well, if they had just handed over the Abram building to Larry Rice when he went making a run to turn it into a homeless shelter, we’d not have this problem!
Ha ha, I kid.
I don’t know, the idea of consolidating all city offices into one conveniently interconnected complex still seems like a better idea to me than the reuse of the Abrams Building. Think of it this way:
1. Sell the Abrams Building and site to a developer because the Mall needs more residential/ office development along it. Removing the Abrams Building and replacing it with new building appropriate for the urban environment would help immensely.
2. Use the proceeds from the Abrams Building sale to help fund the improvements to the Muni Courts Building.
I should add that the other decent idea for the Muni Courts building would be a new museum in downtown. Locating a cultural attraction at the corner of 14th and Market within feet of Kiel and a short walk from the Soldiers Memorial and the Library would make a lot of sense.
I fear the City will use their reuse of Abrams now as an excuse to demolish the old Muni Courts on 14th for private redevelopment.
I agree with Thor’s idea of using the old municipal courts building as a museum or cultural institution. It’s architecture is definitely grand and institutional. I would love it if the architectural museum they talk of building on the east side of the river would instead rehab the muni for their purposes. I can see them even incorporating the adjacent part of the Gateway Mall as a sort of “architectural sculpture park” where they could put together some of the building facades they have salvaged in their entirety. I think it would be a great addition to downtown and bring lots of visitors who would also support downtown restaurants and retail. Imagine crowds of visitors, students, etc. sitting on the steps of the old muni on a gorgeous spring day, a la the Art Institute in Chicago!
Steve, I’m glad John and Jim were able to meet with you and provide more details on their plans. I think this is a fiscally responsible route to take. After all, the L Douglas Abram building where USDA and other offices are located currently, is already a government office building. Yes, it’s butt-ugly. But so is the Post Office annex across 16th. Even though the Opera House is much prettier and historic, it’s still an early sort of super-block type building. It doesn’t seem like it would be that hard to insert stairs into the front entryway of the Abram building, but ADA access would still be from those side routes, I guess. It’s a perfectly functional building for government offices, whereas the Muni Courts would take millions to bring it up to code.
David’s idea is great – let’s push for an architectural museum, perhaps even a branch of the National Building Museum in Washington.
the building should be a shelter for the homeless people and that would lower the crime rate in st.louis becaue people are dying for nothing in urban area. If not using it for a shelter use it for a museum that would create some jobs for people because of the economic crisis out here.
Opening month of KielOpera HOuse, if a full month, even dead of winter will generate $110 million for the regional economy.
This iswhat downtown performing arts centers do in real cities.
Gov Nixon and Linda Martinez should not delay another moment sending in the Stimulus to do the whole civic center, all of it.
Linda did the Kiel deals that caused the problems in the first place..
A chance for atonement
I love St Louis !!