The Federal Reserve & Locust Street
A street grid can be very effective at moving people on foot, bike car or even wheelchair. But then traffic engineers were let lose on the grid and in cities all over the country the grid has been butchered beyond recognition. We’ve got one-way streets and closed streets everywhere which forces many onto just a few roads.
Pedestrians are generally allowed to continue in the path of the old grid unless a big building was built where the street used to exist, such as the convention center. Often streets were taken with the intent of constructing an “urban Oasis” – a pedestrian mall. When you’ve got hundreds and even thousands of pedestrians passing a single point in an hour then turning over the entire right of way to them can make sense. Otherwise it simply makes the pedestrian feel more isolated.
The Federal Reserve of St Louis is finishing up a major expansion to their facility in downtown St Louis. Earlier in the project they turn Locust Street from 4th to Broadway (5th) into a block-long pedestrian mall which enabled the to expand their entry and very likely better secure the facility. All in all the space is well done with good lighting, nice plantings, and plenty of seating.
Yesterday I was driving North on 4th and wanted to make a left and head West to my place at 16th & Locust. Obviously Locust would be a logical choice. Or would have been. My choices were then Pine or Washington. Decades ago I would have had twice that many choices. I picked Washington.
This is not the first time this one-block closure has gotten under my skin.
I guess someone forgot to tell the Federal Reserve about the ADA? Let’s see, I could go right and up onto the sidewalk at the parking garage exit. Hmmm, that doesn’t sound like the safest option. What about crossing from the other side of Locust?
So instead of multiple options a single truck has taken away my only place to cross the street on this block.
I was forced to go to the next block South to cross Broadway. Had the Federal Reserve designed the mall to be more accessible the truck blocking one ramp still would have left me another to use.
The street closure and the provision of only one ramp have the same effect — forcing people to go around what should be a normal straight shot.
Of course someone will come along and recognize the next block of Locust to the West (Broadway to 6th) gets very little traffic. This is because the only cars that can use that block are those headed South on Broadway. Once you go around to the next through street it is just easier to stay on that street. So closing one little block impacts adjacent blocks as well — increasing traffic on some while reducing traffic on others.
Personally I’d never close another street or alley in the city. But when we do we need to keep access for all on both sides of the street in an effort to afford the maximum benefit for the wheeled pedestrian. This includes the young ones seen more often being pushed in strollers downtown.
Since they’re a federal agency, aren’t they supposed to be held to higher standard when it comes to ADA compliance?!
No; the standard is just that…a standard. Everyone should be held equally accountable for following it, whether the federal government or the corner shopkeep.
While I agree that it is frustrating that Locust was closed between 4th and Broadway, the more I have considered the situation, if downtown had greater density I think Locust offers the best possibility for a true pedestrian street or Nicollet Mall bus only street. The real problem is not the closure itself, but that it is being done in a haphazard fashion.
Unless a city is truly creating a pedestrian mall with outdoor seating and activities the closing of streets for plazas is terrible for all the reasons you stated!
The design of the New 64 does much of the same. What use to be a 350-foot roundtrip across a highway on a pedestrian bridge to numerous stores, restaurants, etc. is now 5300-foot roundtrip. Pedestrians get little if any respect in a culture that places the value of motorized vehicles above people. You are illustrating another point in a long line of many in how the quality of our living environment is lowered to meet the needs of a minority. Shameful but what’s new? We have to live with it everyday and now you will too.
I’m in the Federal Building on Spruce and Tucker and it seems pretty ADA friendly to me. After 9/11 Federal buildings have taken extra precaution in regards to security. That doesn’t excuse the Federal Reserve situation however. As Jim noted, they should be setting the bar in compliance. If I may inject a positive on this blog (a seemingly rare occurence), I enjoyed the Hispanic festival and Soulard’s Market this weekend.
“Since they’re a federal agency, aren’t they supposed to be held to higher standard when it comes to ADA compliance?!”
.
Not that it matters to the story, but the Fed is not a federal agency.
Closing Locust for a “bus mall” was an idea talked about in the 1974 downtown plan.
There’s a great reason it never happened. With a closed street, there would be no Board of Education Building, no Louderman Lofts, no Farm & Home rehab. The street would be a dead zone.
Michael,
The bus-mall plan itself is not a bad one, what sucks is the lack of overall density, both employment and residential, in downtown. With a larger day-time and residential population, the concept could be successful.
You really can’t judge what might have happened if. Locust Street, if it had been converted a “bus mall”, could very well have become a “dead zone”, as has happened in several cities around the country. Then, again, in Denver, their 16th Street (bus) Mall has played a critical role in their growth and success over the past 25 years. IF Locust Street had become a transit mall in the late ’70’s, would downtown St. Louis be a more vibrant employment center today? We’ll never know.
.
http://www.rtd-denver.com/Projects/Fact_Sheets/MallRide_Facts.pdf