Home » Featured » Currently Reading:

Readers Not Concerned About LED Street Lights, But Should Be

October 5, 2016 Featured 13 Comments
Natural Bridge was one of the first streets in the city to get new LED street lights, March 2012 photo
Natural Bridge was one of the first streets in the city to get new LED street lights, March 2012 photo

In the Sunday Poll a few days ago nearly three-quarters of readers weren’t concerned about health warnings from new LED street lights, here are the results:

Q: St. Louis is replacing old street lights with LED units. How concerned are you about possible negative health effects of unseen blue light from some LEDs?

  • Very concerned 3 [8.33%]
  • Concerned 3 [8.33%]
  • Somewhat concerned 4 [11.11%]
  • Neutral 1 [2.78%]
  • Somewhat unconcerned 1 [2.78%]
  • Unconcerned 15 [41.67%]
  • Very unconcerned 9 [25%]
  • Unsure/No Answer 0 [0%]

The new lights were tested in 2010.

I’m among the minority that is concerned. We were slow to begin adopting LEDs, which may be a good thing if we learned from cities that made the switch years ago. I’m not so sure we have learned anything from others.

The Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency “put a lot of push into them,” said Michael Siminovitch, director of the California Lighting Technology Center at the University of California at Davis. “I call it a rush.”

Siminovitch said the light from early-generation LEDs “really negatively impacts people’s physiological well-being.”

Lighting is measured by color temperature, which is expressed in “kelvin,” or “K.” The original LED streetlights had temperatures of at least 4000K, which produces a bright white light with a high content of unseen blue light.

Now, LEDs are available with lower kelvin ratings and roughly the same energy efficiency as those with higher ratings. They don’t emit as much potentially harmful blue light, and they produce a softer, amber hue.

White, blue, amber? Kelvin? Okay, it gets technical from this point but I hope I’ve made it understandable to everyone:

Lighting is measured by color temperature, which is expressed in “kelvin,” or “K.” The original LED streetlights had temperatures of at least 4000K, which produces a bright white light with a high content of unseen blue light.

Now, LEDs are available with lower kelvin ratings and roughly the same energy efficiency as those with higher ratings. They don’t emit as much potentially harmful blue light, and they produce a softer, amber hue.

When 4000K and 5000K LEDs were installed, they drew mixed responses. Police and traffic-safety officials and many motorists liked them because they created a bright light that sharply illuminated the ground they covered.

But in many places, including New York City and Seattle, residents complained that the bright white light was harsh, even lurid. People described them as invasive, cold and unflattering. (Washington Post)

To help put this in context, lighting manufacturer Westinghouse explains:

What is color temperature?

  • Color temperature is a way to describe the light appearance provided by a light bulb (lamp). It is measured in degrees of Kelvin (K) on a scale from 1,000 to 10,000.
  • Typically, commercial and residential lighting application Kelvin temperatures fall somewhere on a scale from 2000K to 6500K.
  • A light bulb’s (lamp’s) color temperature lets us know what the look and feel of the light produced will be.
  • The color temperature of a light bulb (lamp) is assigned using the basis of correlated color temperature (CCT).
    For example, if you heat up a metal object, the object appears to glow. Depending on the Kelvin temperature that the metal object is being heated at, the glow will be various colors, such as orange, yellow or blue. The color temperature of light bulbs (lamps) is meant to replicate the Kelvin temperature of the metal object.

What color temperature is right for me?
Understanding Kelvin temperature (K) makes it easier to choose lighting that gives you the look and feel you want.

  • At the lower end of the scale, from 2000K to 3000K, the light produced is called “warm white” and ranges from orange to yellow-white in appearance.
  • Color temperatures between 3100K and 4500K are referred to as “cool white” or “bright white.” Light bulbs (lamps) within this range will emit a more neutral white light and may even have a slightly blue tint.
  • Above 4500K brings us into the “daylight” color temperature of light. Light bulbs (lamps) with color temperatures of 4500K and above will give off a blue-white light that mimics daylight.

Apparently the first generation of LED street lights were 4,000-5,000k, basically simulating the color temperature of daylight. Better options do exist now:

More recently engineered LED lighting is now available at 3000K or lower. At 3000K, the human eye still perceives the light as “white,” but it is slightly warmer in tone, and has about 21% of its emission in the blue-appearing part of the spectrum. This emission is still very blue for the nighttime environment, but is a significant improvement over the 4000K lighting because it reduces discomfort and disability glare. Because of different coatings, the energy efficiency of 3000K lighting is only 3% less than 4000K, but the light is more pleasing to humans and has less of an impact on wildlife. (AMA Report PDF download)

Even East-West Gateway Council of Governments addressed the issue via Great Streets St. Louis:

Lamps also have two important color characteristics: the color of the emitted light (measured in degrees Kelvin/color temperature) and the accuracy of colors as seen under the light (measured as a Color Rendering Index – CRI). 

High-pressure sodium measures at about 2200K (peach-colored orange), a household incandescent lamp rates 2700K (considered the most desirable color range), and a bright white metal halide lamp used in stadium lighting might be 4000K.

My concern is in our rush to make streets brighter we’ll ignore warnings about color temperature and install lighting with negative consequences. In the future nobody can claim “unforeseen circumstances” because this issues has been raised for years now. Better options exist.

Who knows, we might be installing the lower Kelvin LED lights. I intend to inquire.

— Steve Patterson

 

Currently there are "13 comments" on this Article:

  1. JZ71 says:

    So, next, we need to bring back air pollution, because the sky is too blue?!

    Some of the most efficient street lighting is low-pressure sodium, but people hate it because its CRI (color rendering index) sucks – it makes red cars look black because it’s only producing light on the yellow spectrum.

    The bigger issue is light pollution, in general, not any specific light source. If you’re trying to sleep, it doesn’t matter if the light shining inside your bedroom window is HPS, LPS, MH, LED or incandescent, it’s a damn light and it’s messing up your sleep rhythms. And if you’re awake and walking or driving, at night, you’re receiving far, far less light, of ANY color, than you receive during the daylight hours, from the sun!

    When it comes to messing with sleep patterns, yes, the biggest culprit has been the LED. But it’s not the LED’s in street lights, it’s the LED’s in smart phones. Few people are willing to “just say no” and put the damn thing down, in another room, and walk away, so that they won’t be disturbed by that blue screen a foot away from their face!

    Blaming LED streetlights for physiological problems is another one of those academic exercises of trying to identify a problem in search of a solution. This is a much more balanced discussion of the situation: http://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/conservation/led-streetlights-are-giving-neighborhoods-the-blues . . And these are two discussions about light pollution, in general, not just street lighting: http://www.naturebright.com/research-news/3-ways-artificial-light-has-contributed-to-depression/ . . and: https://chriskresser.com/how-artificial-light-is-wrecking-your-sleep-and-what-to-do-about-it/

     
    • We just need to recognize that not all LED street lights are equal. Today I hope to find out which mixture is the city-approved replacement being installed.

       
    • dmoran says:

      This post shows the usual misconception that blue light is “natural” so what’s the problem? Yes, it is natural, but only during daylight hours and in fact we need it then to be healthy…that is also part of our circadian function. But warmer light is “natural” at night throughout nature: sunsets and fire light and even moonlight…cities are NOT correct when they say the color of LED street lights is the same as that of the moon…the color temperature is about the same, but their spectra are very different with the Moon having very little blue in it, plus the Moon is not up and full all night every night. The production of melatonin at night which induces sleep and retards the growth of many cancers is signaled by the absence of blue light and now cities are messing with that. Plenty of studies over the last few decades have shown both statistically and directly that suppressing melatonin at night is very harmful to humans and animals. Even trees suffer from the all night long blue light. The problem is that this could take some time to show up but with LEDs lasting 20 years, it will be extremely expensive to undo if we do it wrong now and find out that driving and living at home are both very uncomfortable once a city is saturated with high glare white light.
      And on top of that, the lights that the AMA recommends doubles down on the advantages of LED street lights. We should be saving even more energy if they are done right. There is zero rationality to ignoring the AMA unless you are someone trying to get rid of your white LED inventory or selling energy.

       
      • Exactly, thank you! Trying to make the night city seem like day is messing up humans and wildlife. Now is the time to get this right, not millions of dollars down the road.

         
      • JZ71 says:

        The “natural light” after dark is no light at all! Street lighting and indoor lighting is a fairly recent invention in human evolution, much like motorized transportation. I’ll repeat, light pollution, in general, is a much bigger problem than the color spectrum of the light source, from any source!

         
        • dmoran says:

          I agree that light should be used as sparingly as possible, but it is not going to be zero in a big city. The best we can do is talk about the quality of light wherever it is installed.

           
          • JZ71 says:

            We’ll probably have to agree to disagree – that picture of Natural Bridge (at the top of this post) is at the core of the problem – if the definition of “good” or “safe” is even, wall-to-wall lighting, bright enough to read by, then we will never “solve” the problem by focusing on sources!

             
  2. Marty says:

    Hi Steve.

    Unfortunately I missed the poll. I also agree with you and look forward to hearing about future plans if you do indeed follow up on this issue.

    Marty

     
  3. Mark-AL says:

    You appear to take a fairly conservative position on the use of LED lighting because the possibility exists that its widespread use may be harmful to humans and wildlife, a position that I commend and is also supported by the AMA, according to dmoran, who appears to know what she’s talking about. And your two-line response to her post suggests that you support her views on this topic. Yet, you back medical use of marijuana, despite the AMA’s inability to support it and despite the lack of clinical research clarifying the medical utility of marijuana. The AMA has urged the National Institute of Health to implement procedures to fund research into the medical utility of marijuana, and to date there is no evidence that confirms whether medical marijuana is either clinically effective or safe. It’s as confusing to me as a person who widely advocates programs that support the disadvantaged who are living among us, yet rationalizes the slaughter of the unborn who are also living among us.

     
  4. dmoran says:

    One problem with polls is that there is a little every man for himself here. The real question is how many of the people who have a street light in their yard, especially one not buried in a tree are concerned with the health effects. At most in many cities, that is only one in four houses. So it may be that a very high percentage of the people most affected are not happy. I spoke to one person who was delighted with his white LED street light. Turns out it was blocked by an unusually very thick foliage tree that completely kept the light from falling on his window or even his yard. But if that tree is deciduous, just wait until winter when the leaves fall and you are looking at that light for many more hours before you try to fall asleep.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe