Readers Like St. Louis’ Gateway Transportation Center
In the poll last week readers liked our combined Amtrak & Greyhound station but were not impressed with the surroundings.
Q:Â St. Louis’ combined Amtrak & Greyhound station opened on 11/21/2008. Your thoughts on the station?
- Can’t compete with the heyday of Union Station but it is a vast improvement over facilities for the decades prior. 84 [58.74%]
- The station is OK but the immediate area needs attention. 33 [23.08%]
- Other answer… 11 [7.69%]
- James Howard Kunstler was right, it is an embarrassing eyesore. 8 [5.59%]
- Unsure/no opinion 5 [3.5%]
- I didn’t like it at first but I’ve warmed to it. 1 [0.7%]
- I liked it at first but I’m less and less impressed as times goes on. 1 [0.7%]
The following are the “other” answers:
- I LOVE IT !
- Needs to be near the Metro, needs multilevel parking garage.
- nice. but money should be invested in union station
- Should of used Union Station
- Why not re-use Union Station? It works, and would make it seem less empty
- Where is the option for like?
- It is an eyesore, and embarrassing that the original is so under-utilized.
- functional, but architecturally weak
- I like it, plain and simple
- It’s not terrible, but an under utilized Union Station is criminal!
- I have liked it all along.
Amtrak pulled out of Union Station in the early 70s, switching to a shack under the large train shed and finally to a “temporary” along the rail lines. Â Union Station, a massive structure, was sold to private developers. Â Additional structures have been constructed between the former station and the rail lines. Â Amtrak doesn’t like to back into stations. Â Need more reasons why not Union Station?
I don’t get the comment above, “Needs to be near the Metro.” Â They could not be any closer together!