By now most have formed an opinion of MVVA’s winning proposal in the City+Arch+River competition. Â Over the next five years we will (hopefully) see work completed on both sides of the river. For the poll this week I hope to get a sense of what you think of the proposal. Â I know there are those who are disappointed, but are they a few or the majority? Â The poll is in the upper right sidebar.
– Steve Patterson
In August 2010. a year after opening, door openers have been added to the two front doors at Culinaria downtown.
These went up just days after I posted about the absence of them. Â These were already in the works so my post had nothing to do with them being installed. Â They were just waiting to determine if the State of Missouri was going to foot the bill for their installation. You see, we taxpayers own the 9th Street Parking Garage where Culinaria is located.
– Steve Patterson
Yesterday I looked at MVVA’s plan to close Washington Ave between the river and I-70. Today I will look at proposed changes an the edge of the Mississippi River.
“Our proposal removes the existing waterfront streetscape in order to reinstate the full form of the cobblestone levee. Sculptural river gauges mirror the monumentality of Saarinen’s river walls and frame the use of the levee surface in relation to the fluctuating river edge. The single central stage is replaced by a gentle swell in the cobble surface that can accommodate a broader spectrum of markets, concerts, and seasonal attractions.”
Consultants had this to say:
This design would improve connectivity for pedestrians and bikes at the north and south ends, but reduce vehicular connectivity overall with the closure of Washington Avenue and Poplar Street. Gates would be added to the arches under Eads Bridge, removing vehicular access to Leonor K. Sullivan Boulevard from the north. In addition, moving the garage entrance closer to the river would result in diminished access due to frequent flooding.
The drawing looks good but the reality will be quite different. Â Like the many failed pedestrian malls we’ve had in the US, removing cars is no guarantee pedestrians will fill the space. In fact, removing auto access makes it more difficult for some to reach the location. Â So do I think it should remain unchanged? Â Hardly. Â I’m an advocate of mixing all modes of transportation — pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and vehicles.
Like the stretch of Washington Ave next to Eads Bridge, Lenore K. Sullivan is excessively wide.
I personally would like to see a very narrow street remain, too narrow for tour buses & trucks. Â Include pockets of on-street parking on both sides but include bulb-outs between the pockets so the main curb to curb is narrow, even if no cars are parked. Â For events the street can be closed as has always been the case for years.
The stated goal of the competition was connectivity, closing off streets does the opposite.
– Steve Patterson
Overall I’m fine with MVVA’s winning proposal for connecting to the Arch but one idea is horrible — the removal of Washington Ave along the south edge of the Eads Bridge. Â On page 12 of the MVVA narrative they wrote:
“By removing the existing Memorial garage and the terminus of Washington Avenue, which is used almost exclusively by garage patrons, our proposal allows the openings in the Eads Bridge to serve as portals between Laclede’s Landing and a dynamic civic landscape. Accessible pathways stitch together a mix of neighborhood programs and event space, including a large playground, comfortable shaded seating, an earthen amphitheater, and the Gateway Urban Ecology Center, which offers afterschool programs and summer camps for St. Louis and East St. Louis students.”
Yes, the north parking garage is a hideous barrier between Laclede’s Landing and the Arch Grounds, but Washington Ave is not a problem. Â Streets connect. Narrow the street to the width of those in Laclede’s Landing but leave it so circulation in the area isn’t cut off more. Â Allow pedicabs, carriages and vehicles to slowly navigate the area. Â But cutting off more of the grid will create more problems than it solves.
– Steve Patterson
This view of Charlie Gitto’s with an big parking garage on the left and a surface parking lot on the right exemplifies everything that went wrong with urban planning. On this city block, only one other building dodged the wrecking ball.
– Steve Patterson