Primary season is now in full swing for Tuesday’s election. My mailbox has been flooded with slick postcards telling me how bad the other guy or gal is. I might just put them all in a big pile and then sort by each candidate — the one that sent me the fewest items for my recycling gets my vote.
With hundreds of municipalities in the St Louis region it is just to much work to summarize every election. Illinois is not holding elections on Tuesday. Thus I will focus only on the ballot in the city with one exception.
The exception is Proposition Y in the city and most of St Louis County. This is a bond issue for the Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) which reads as:
To comply with federal and state clean water requirements, shall The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) issue its sewer system revenue bonds in the amount of Two Hundred Seventy-five Million Dollars ($275,000,000) for the purpose of designing, constructing, improving, renovating, repairing, replacing and equipping new and existing MSD sewer facilities and system, including sewer disposal and treatment plants, sanitary and combined sanitary and stormwater sewers, and acquisition of easements and real property related thereto, the cost of operation and maintenance of said sewer system and the principal of and interest on said revenue bonds to be payable solely from the revenues derived by MSD from the operation of its sanitary sewer system, including all future extensions and improvements thereto?
MSD, created in 1954, is one of the few regional governmental entities that we have. Still in a region of 16 counties (8 in Missouri and 8 in Illinois) its really hard to view MSD as regional as it only covers St Louis city and county — two of the 16 counties the city is both a city and county). Just over half the region’s residents live in MSD’s boundaries (1.5 million out of 2.7 million).
MSD needs these bonds to raise money to keep our aging sewer infrastructure working and to bring it into compliance with federal and state standards. Interestingly MSD says our system is about the same size as the system serving Los Angeles:
Formed in 1954, MSD is the combination of 79 separate sewer systems that have been incorporated into one entity over the last several decades. The sewer system MSD manages today is one of the largest and most complex systems in the United States. In terms of wastewater sewers alone, MSD manages the 4th largest system in the nation. To give some perspective on what “4th largest†means for our community, consider that MSD’s wastewater system is approximately the same size as the wastewater system in Los Angeles, California. Although the two systems are approximately the same size –as measured in miles of wastewater sewer pipe –system upgrades and operational costs in Los Angeles are shared by over 5 million residents versus approximately 1.4 million in St. Louis.
The cost of unchecked sprawl is we have fewer people to share the burden of funding the system . Vote yes on Prop Y.
Governor
Both Democrats & Republicans have primary challenges to determine who faces each other in November. I’m for Attorney General Jay Nixon, a Democrat. I haven’t paid much attention to the field on the Republican side.
Lieutenant Governor
Both Democrats and Republicans have several choices. I endorse Democrat Sam Page — a state Rep from Creve Coeur. I’ve had the chance to talk to him a couple of times and I think he is genuinely concerned about the environment. It will be Lt Gov Peter Kinder vs. Sam Page in November.
State Treasurer
Only one Republican and four Democrats in this primary. The Dems are Mark Powell, Clint Zweifel, Andria Danine Simckes and Charles B. Wheeler. I haven’t a clue yet.
Attorney General
With Jay Nixon running for Governor that leaves the race wide open. Only a single Republican in this primary, state Sen. Mike Gibbons. On the Democratic ballot we have four candidates; Chris Koster, Margaret Donnelly, Jeff Harris and Molly Williams. Like the state treasurer race I’ve got to do some last minute research.
State Senate District 5
This race to succeed term limited Maida Coleman has gotten lots of ink. The ballot has only two candidate — state reps Rodney R. Hubbard and Robin Wright-Jones. A third candidate, State Rep Connie Johnson, had filed but a judge determined she didn’t live in the district! I know Hubbard and campaign staffer Antonio French but that is not reason enough to vote/endorse him. More research to be done before stepping in front of the voting machine on Tuesday.
State Representative District 57
Joseph Palm is challenging incumbent Tailbdin El-Amin. Haven’t really followed this race.
State Representative District 60
Kimberly Gardner is challenging incumbent Jamilah Nasheed. I’m in a different district so I haven’t watched the campaigns of these two.
State Representative District 61
Chris Carter, Curtis Royston III and Anthony Bell are going for the seat being vacated by Connie Johnson
State Representative District 63
Two candidates are seeking the seat currently held by Robin Wright-Jones who as noted above is running for the state Senate.
State Representative District 64
Michael Roberts Jr. is running against incumbent Rachel Storch. We’ve got to watch that Roberts — if he is like his dad he’ll want to rename the Missouri capital capitol building the Roberts’ Capital Capitol Building.
State Representative District 65
Two political names face off in this district — incumbent Michele Kratky is challenged by Michael Favazza.
State Representative District 67
Mike Daus has served as the state rep for the 67th for 8 years. Thus he is out based on term limits. In 2001 he narrowly lost to Jennifer Florida for the 15th ward Aldermanic seat. So he went to Jefferson City instead. Five Democrats are seeking to replace him; Mike Colona, Chad Beffa, Joan Landmann and Emily Jo Pierce. I’ve met Colona before — he seems alright. If you live in this district do some research.
State Representative District 108
Like Mike Daus, Tom Villa is term limited out of office. Two candidates are seeking to replace him, Jacob Hummel and Art Gansner. With no Republican running one of these two will soon be elected.
Sheriff
This is another of those county positions since the city is also a county. Ken Griffey is seeking, once again, to displace incumbent James Murphy. Murphy campaigned against me when I ran for Alderman in 2005 . That and he has had the job for a while are two reasons to support Griffey.
City Treasurer
Daniel Schesch is challenging incumbent Larry C. Williams. By some weird twist of things the city treasurer is in charge of parking in the city. Williams has had the job long enough — it is time for some fresh blood in the office. Vote for Schesch.
Ward Committee Positions
Each party elects a Committeeman and Committeewoman for each of the 28 wards. The problem is we are such a one party city you seldom see any Greens, Libertarians or Republicans running at this level. While I want to remove party affiliation at the municipal level I’d like to see more folks from other parties getting involved.
Most of these 56 positions on the Democratic ballot are uncontested. You can write in a name if you want a choice other than the one person running. Remember there is nothing obligating you to voting for a candidate when they are the only one running. If any of you in the 6th ward are so inclined, go ahead and write in my name for Committeeman.
In the 15th ward you’ve got candidates from two ward organizations running against each other.
In the 21st Ward Incumbent Arthur “Chink” Washington is being challenged by Pubdef’s Antonio French. French’s late grandmother was the committeewoman for many years. Good luck Antonio.
In the 27th ward Royston & Carter from the 61st Dist house race are facing off again for Committeeman.
I’m kind of disappointed that more candidates from the 20th ward didn’t seek to replace the current committee persons as that would make it a bit easier to unseat Craig Schmid come 2011.
Further Reading
If you’ve got thoughts on these races and the bond issue use the comment form below. I’m personally more interested to hear why we should support someone rather than why we shouldn’t support the other guy.