Home » Downtown » Recent Articles:

Latest Agreement for Ballpark Village Announced Today

July 23, 2008 Downtown 14 Comments

Earlier today information on the revised Ballpark Village development agreement was released:

CARDINALS, CITY OF ST. LOUIS AND THE CORDISH COMPANY REACH BALLPARK VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Stifel Nicolaus Plays Critical Role in New Agreement

ST. LOUIS, July 23, 2008 – The St. Louis Cardinals, The Cordish Company and the Honorable Francis Slay, Mayor of the City of St. Louis, today announced that an agreement has been reached to proceed with the development of Ballpark Village, a world-class entertainment and lifestyle development planned north of the new Busch Stadium in downtown St. Louis.
Ballpark Village will transform multiple blocks of downtown St. Louis into one of the premiere mixed-use developments in the United States, acting as an important catalyst for the continued revitalization of downtown St. Louis.

“This is an exciting day for the St. Louis Cardinals organization, our fans, and for the city of St. Louis,” said Bill DeWitt III, president of the St. Louis Cardinals. “We greatly appreciate the efforts of everyone involved in reaching this important milestone. We are absolutely committed to delivering a development of the highest quality for our fans and for the City.”

DeWitt also noted that many developments of the same scope as Ballpark Village have stalled or been put on hold throughout the country, which makes this announcement all the more meaningful.

“The Cordish Company has been a terrific partner in working through an extremely complicated mixed-use, public/private development deal,” DeWitt said. “We chose Cordish as our partner because of their track record in delivering these types of projects in other cities. But we have also been impressed with their design team’s willingness to tailor this project to the specific characteristics of the St. Louis market.”

St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay said Wednesday that he supports the new agreement and will recommend it for immediate approval to the Board of Estimate & Apportionment, the St. Louis Board of Aldermen, and the State of Missouri.

“We are very pleased to be moving this project forward. It will undoubtedly have spin-off benefits for the entire metropolitan region,” Mayor Slay said. He added: “In today’s market, it is extremely rare to finance a development of this size without putting any existing tax dollars at risk. With zero City risk and zero City direct investment, Ballpark Village will create thousands of new construction and permanent jobs, generate tens of millions of tax dollars for City services, and create new office space to keep and attract high-paying professional jobs.”

“Ballpark Village is going to be spectacular, and we are thrilled that an agreement has been reached,” said Blake Cordish, senior vice president of The Cordish Company. “Most importantly, as we have experienced in other cities, Ballpark Village will act as an anchor for the continued renaissance of downtown St. Louis. We passionately believe in the future of St. Louis, as evidenced by what will be a multi-hundred-million-dollar investment in the City, and are committed to delivering a world-class development that will celebrate St. Louis and feature a connection between the ballpark and the City which will be unmatched in the U.S.

“The tenant interest in the project has been unflagging and overwhelming from the beginning. At the end of the day, when you have positive tenant interest, projects always find a way to happen. We look forward to making announcements as the development proceeds and opening a world-class development for the City, the Cardinals, and their fans.”

DeWitt added that Ballpark Village will provide new class A office space which will help fill a void in the market. “With views of the Gateway Arch, Busch Stadium, downtown, and the river, Ballpark Village will offer signature office space unavailable anywhere else in the region,” DeWitt said.

DeWitt, Mayor Slay and Cordish all commended Stifel Nicolaus and its chairman, Ron Kruszewski, for assisting in the complex negotiations which made today’s announcement possible. Mayor Slay enlisted the company several months ago to help facilitate negotiations between the parties in a financial environment that was undergoing rapid change. Kruszewski commented, “We were charged with modifying the previous development agreement to give the development team more flexibility to respond to changing market conditions while also preserving the City’s core principles, primarily that no existing taxpayer money or credit be put at risk in any way. This new agreement accomplishes all of these goals.”

David Cordish, chairman of The Cordish Company, said, “The City administration should also be applauded for showing remarkable creativity in enlisting the private sector to help accomplish its goals. Stifel has spent hundreds of hours, noncompensated, and successfully helped structure a partnership between the developers and the City of St. Louis for a project that will dramatically change the St. Louis region for the better.”

Highlights of the deal include:
As with the previous agreement, the City is not at risk and does not use general funds to finance the public portion of the project – all public money comes from a portion of the future tax revenues of the project itself.

Approximate phase 1 costs increase from $280m to over $320m and the approximate total project cost (phases 1 and 2) from $387m to over $600m.

The percentage of city and state participation (plus TDD/CID assessments within the project) in the first phase decreases from 35% to 32% in the anticipated phase 1 and decreases from 30% to 24% upon the anticipated completion of phase 2.

Over 3,000 construction jobs are expected to result from phase 1 development as well as over 2,000 permanent jobs.

The office component is now a range of between 100,000 – 750,000 square feet in phase 1. The current plan for phase 1 calls for approximately 300,000 square feet of office.

The retail component is now a range of between 225,000 and 360,000 square feet. The current plan for phase 1 calls for approximately 300,000 square feet of retail.

The residential component is a range of between 100 and 250 units and will likely be developed in the second phase.

The agreement enables increased office space as well as a hotel component in the first phase of Ballpark Village.

Developer provides cost overrun protection.

Developer provides completion guarantee backed by financial penalties.

The Cardinals and Cordish are expecting to begin construction on the site work for the project shortly. The exact date will be announced in the coming weeks. This will allow the developers to get a jump start on the construction schedule as the final approvals make their way through the City and State governmental bodies. The final closing for the public portion of the financing is expected to occur in early 2009.

So how does this stack up against the original agreement? On paper it looks very similar. The plan two years ago called for 100,000 sq. ft. of office space. Today they are saying the office portion will be three times as large and possibly seven and a half times as large.

Site of previous Busch Stadium and proposed Ballpark Village in October 2006
Above: Site of previous Busch Stadium and proposed Ballpark Village in October 2006. The Bowling Hall of Fame seen in the bottom of the above image is moving to Texas so that triangular plot will become part of the new development.
Originally they indicated the project would include 250 residential units. This has now been adjusted to a range of 100-250 units in the second phase. That translates to 99 units sometime way in the future.
In their original proposal they indicated 270,000 sq. ft. of restaurant & entertainment with an additional 90,000 sq. ft. of retail. The latest plan has a range of 225,000 to 360,000 sq. ft. of retail with restaurant & entertainment venues presumably lumped in with the total retail square footage. So that is about the same as two years ago. Previously they had said 1,200 new parking spaces but that was not mentioned today.
New to the mix is a hotel. Several hotels already exist within a block of the project so I’m not sure if this is a good thing. Additional hotel rooms may just siphon business from other hotels.
They are indicating the total project cost will increase. Previously they had said $387 million and now that is a total of phase 1 & 2 from $387 million to $600 million.  So we’ve reduced residential, increased office and added a hotel. Fair enough I suppose.
What is not clear is how the uses and square footages will be distributed on the site and within each phase.
Also still unclear is the proposed traffic patterns for 7th & 8th streets.  For 40+ years now 7th has curved one-way Northbound around the site to reconnect with the city’s grid at Walnut.  Meanwhile 8th street has long been a one-way Southbound street.  The prior plan suggested 7th would be straightened out and simply extended South from Walnut. If so the question becomes what happens to Northbound traffic coming from the area to the South of the stadium?  Would 8th finally become two-way again?
There was no discussion about the urban qualities of the latest proposal.  It was all the total amount of interior space and the projected costs.  I want to see discussion on the width of sidewalks, the inclusion of street trees, provisions for bicycle & scooter/motorcycle parking and so on.  Talk to me about the scale of the buildings as they meet the sidewalk.
It does appear they want to get construction started right away so that it will the phase 1 will be in full swing for the 2009 all-star game here on May 9th of next year.  While a newly complete project would have been nice I think seeing numerous buildings under construction might send a positive image around the nation.
There are still many unanswered questions about this project that hopefully will become clearer in the coming weeks. I’m just glad to see something still happening.
Related posts:
 

I Might Have Ended Up in a Car Dependent Situation

July 23, 2008 Downtown 9 Comments

When I was in the hospital following my stroke the level that I would recover early on was not known. While I was sedated family and friends discussed where I might end up. A nursing home was an option. One of my brothers though I should go live with him back in my birth town of Oklahoma City so he could attend to my needs. Thankfully my recovery progressed very well and was able to return to my own place in downtown St Louis.

But what about my brother’s place? It features many bedrooms & bathrooms and a predominate 3-car garage. Both of the subdivision’s entrances are gated. It is the complete opposite of my downtown lifestyle.

Using walkscore.com I confirmed what I already knew about his place — it is car dependent. The Walk Score was a low 38 out of 100. Helping it get that high of a score is a grocery store & pharmacy just 0.22 miles as the crow flies. Walking out his front door and looking left you can spot the parking lot lights for the store. Getting there, however, is another thing completely.

A couple of years ago while visiting I walked over there for something. This required a walk through the curving streets of his subdivision and passing all the 3-car garages. The internal sidewalks end at the gate. To leave on foot you must walk through the gate used by motorists. Now out at a busy arterial that has yet to be widened to four lanes you basically end up walking in the drainage ditch as no sidewalks are provided. This route about doubles the distance to the store.

The home where we grew up is not much better getting 45 out of 100. Again zero sidewalks which is not something factored into the scoring. The drive-in theater listed at .99 miles away has been closed for 30+ years. The restaurant about the same distance away is a drive-in! Returning to Oklahoma would not have been an option for me.

My other brother’s place in the Bay Area gets a “somewhat walkable” score of 68 out of 100. I’ve walked with him and his wife while visiting and though it is not the same as being in San Francisco it is pretty decent. They’ve got a nice market reachable by sidewalks and a cute old downtown nearby.
But none of those are home for me. My loft between 16th & 17th gets a “very walkable” 83 out of 100. Put in the address for say the Paul Brown rental lofts at 816 Olive and it gets a rating of “walker’s paradise”, a 100 out of 100! Lumiere Place in Laclede’s Landing gets a 78 out of 100 — still “very walkable” in their rating system. All are downtown but each has a different score.

Walk Score acknowledges their system is not perfect:

We’ll be the first to admit that Walk Score is just an approximation of walkability. There are a number of factors that contribute to walkability that are not part of our algorithm:
Public transit: Good public transit is important for walkable neighborhoods.
Street width and block length: Narrow streets slow down traffic. Short blocks provide more routes to the same destination and make it easier to take a direct route.
Street design: Sidewalks and safe crossings are essential to walkability. Appropriate automobile speeds, trees, and other features also help.
Safety from crime and crashes: How much crime is in the neighborhood? How many traffic accidents are there? Are streets well-lit?
Pedestrian-friendly community design: Are buildings close to the sidewalk with parking in back? Are destinations clustered together?
Topography: Hills can make walking difficult, especially if you’re carrying groceries.
Freeways and bodies of water: Freeways can divide neighborhoods. Swimming is harder than walking.
Weather: In some places it’s just too hot or cold to walk regularly.

Kirkwood’s city hall also gets a “walker’s paradise” score of 100 out of 100 while Manchester’s gets a “somewhat walkable” at 65. Sorry but Manchester Rd at 141 isn’t even remotely walkable. Downtown Kirkwood is a much different feel than 8th & Olive yet they get the same score. Take it all with a grain of salt. It does give you a good glimpse into an area and shows you what is nearby. Density is a good thing — the more goods and services nearby the better. I guess I should develop an urban score rating system?

As the technology advances and they can begin to show a walking distance then places like my brother’s house that is within visual sight of a grocery store but a long walk will see their scores drop in relation to other places that have a good street grid to get you there directly.

I’m just so thankful that I’m home in my very walkable neighborhood and not in my brother’s nice but car dependent home.

 

Some People Shouldn’t Procreate or Have Firearms

July 22, 2008 Downtown 42 Comments

We’ve all met someone that as we walk away think they shouldn’t procreate the human species nor should they have access to anything stronger than a water pistol. Yesterday one such unstable person shot & killed a Maplewood firefighter and injured two Maplewood police officers. The man is presumed dead in his burnt out & collapsed house.

Last week a divorced couple died in a murder-suicide outside a suburban St. Louis mall. Earlier this year a man went on a shooting rampage at the Kirkwood City Hall killing several and injuring several more, including the mayor.

In 2005 John Alexander of Frontenac shot and killed his wife Kelli Alexander and her friend April Wheeler on Bopp Rd. The Alexander’s young children were in their mom’s vehicle and witnessed the shootings. A few years earlier I met the Alexander family at their Frontenac home. They (he) had called my employer about remodeling their home. I had done the design on a major renovation to a neighbor’s home so I was one of three people that met with them. He wasn’t right and we all knew it. When he decided against remodeling the home I know I was relieved that I’d not have to spend another minute with him. His wife Kelli must have realized it to as she had filed for divorce. After he killed these two women he led police on a brief chase which ended when he lost control of his SUV, flipping and killing himself in the process.

Now I love our Constitution and Bill of Rights but some of these folks had no right to have access to guns. The young Maplewood firefighter would still be alive today if that nutcase didn’t have a gun.
I’ve never liked guns. They are designed to take life. Period. Yes I know ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people.’ Well then we need to stop arming people with the tools they need to kill other people.

Advocates of the right to carry a concealed weapon claim that if criminals know someone may be packing heat that it deters crime and gives people an ability to defend themselves. But the unstable person doesn’t care if they die in the process. More guns just increases the risk of innocent persons getting caught in crossfire.

Yesterday’s event in Maplewood was certainly a tragedy. My condolences to the family & friends of the killed firefighter. Best wishes to the two injured officers on a speedy recovery.

 

Would Pedestrian Access Have Saved This Starbuck’s?

July 21, 2008 Downtown 12 Comments

As we’ve all heard Starbuck’s is closing some 600 under performing stores nationwide.  A number of those are in our region.  One is still very new.

It was just in October of last year that I posted about a suburban-style strip center being built with an adjacent Starbuck’s drive-thru (see St. Louis’ Leaders Critical of New Urbanism while Supporting Sprawl Development in Old Urbanist Areas).

And it is closing because it is under performing.  I guess that means cars are not lined up in the drive-through lane wasting $4/gal gas.  Good.   7th & Russell is on the edge of Soulard and hardly the right spot for a drive-thru.  It was only after I pointed out the lack of an ADA required access route that the strip center got such a connection to the public sidewalk.

The Starbuck’s, however, opened without providing the federally required access route.  Why should it, they’ve managed to open other locations in the city and county without meeting this ADA requirement (see post with examples).

I doubt that providing a sidewalk from the public sidewalk to their front door would have saved this location from closure but it couldn’t have hurt.  It would also make the site compliant so that the next occupant could easily accept walk-in traffic from the adjacent dense neighborhood.

 

Post-Dispatch Editorial Board Weighs In on the Lid vs Boulevard Debate

July 18, 2008 Downtown 18 Comments

Today’s paper has an editorial giving widespread attention to the idea of abandoning a section of I-70 once the new Mississippi River bridge is complete and remaking Memorial Drive sans the depressed lanes of the highway:

There appears to be widespread acceptance of the concept of the lid among local leaders; less so the concept of the as-yet-unspecified attraction, at least not yet. The National Park Service — the mission of which is the preservation and protection of the national parks, monuments and other entities over which it has stewardship — has reservations about it. And within the local architectural and planning community, there is some concern that the lid itself might not be the best way to solve the problem of access to the Arch grounds.

For the full editorial with links back to this blog, to Rick Bonasch’s blog and to a KWMU commentary by Michael Allen click here. Hopefully this will put an end to the costly “lid” nonsense and we can move forward with fixing major gashes in our city.

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe