Got Parking Tickets?

If you have outstanding parking tickets you might want to get those paid.

With municipal budgets tighter and tighter cities are looking to collect unpaid tickets. In North Carolina the city of Raleigh will be “intercepting” future state tax refunds to reduce the $1.6 million in unpaid parking tickets (story). In St. Louis other methods are usedL

A parking scofflaw is any violator who accumulates at least four outstanding parking tickets (i.e., tickets that are unpaid at least 16 days after the ticket issuance date). The Parking Division’s boot crews are authorized to immobilize (apply a booting device to) any vehicle that is on the current Parking Scofflaw File. Once a vehicle has been immobilized, it is subject to immediate tow. The City uses City-owned and contracted tow trucks to tow tow-eligible vehicles. Possible boot removal: After a vehicle has been immobilized, and until it has been towed, a motorist may have the boot removed once the Parking Division has received adequate proof that the parking scofflaw has paid all outstanding fines and fees for the booted vehicle. For the purpose of boot removal, a Payment Receipt from PVB or a Dismissal Form from PVB shall constitute proof of payment. This option is not available once the vehicle has been towed. Any motorist whose vehicle has been booted must pay the required booting fee, as approved by the Parking Commission. The booting fee of $50.00 must be paid at Parking Violations Bureau before a person can reclaim his or her vehicle. (source)

The penalty is similar in Clayton:

Vehicle will be subject to tow upon accumulation of six (6) or more unpaid tickets or over $150.00 in unpaid fines. Additional fees for towing, storage and impoundment will be imposed. (source)

Really people? Every time I’ve received a parking ticket I think of the 10-12 times I could have gotten a ticket but didn’t, then I pay the fine.

– Steve Patterson

Matchbox Didn’t Make a ‘Suburb’ Playset

Christmas means different things to different people, to me it means family, friends and food. Especially food!

In my early years it also meant Matchbox toys!

Each year I’d get more cars & trucks and eventually I got the Matchbox City & Matchbox Country playsets.

I never thought about it at the time but neither represented where I lived, a suburban 1060s subdivision in Oklahoma City.  When I was young Oklahoma City was the largest US city based on total land area. Where we lived was very suburban, but not a suburb. Our driveway had room for nine cars — three wide by three deep! We had no sidewalks.

Our subdivision was once a farm, the abandoned farmhouse was behind my best friend’s house. It has since been restored and occupied. The Matchbox country was the idealic place though. I suppose where we lived was peaceful countryside decades earlier.

Of course the playsets were designed for toy cars so it’s to be expected they are all about roads and parking.

I wonder what a Matchbox Suburb playset would have looked like? Would it have been one large parking lot? Would the housing have been behind gates? Would they have offered variations such as Matchbox Suburb (Streetcar Edition) or Matchbox Suburb (Exurban Edition)?  I think a Matchbox City (Urban Renewal Edition) would have been interesting. Kids could have bought various Matchbox trucks to demolish buildings and construct highways. Hmm, I guess I’m glad they didn’t have that.

Happy Holidays everyone!’

– Steve Patterson

Approaching the MacArthur Bridge (Updated)

One of the differences I see between urbanists and suburbanites is the love of old vs new, respectively. Urbanists see beauty in old, even decaying, structures whereas others feel more comfortable around new everything. Take the Missouri approach to the MacArthur Bridge over the Mississippi River as an example.

I love the rusting steel structure.

The MacArthur Bridge over the Mississippi River between St. Louis, Missouri and East St. Louis, Illinois is a 647 foot (197 m) long truss bridge. Construction on the bridge was begun in 1909 by the city of St. Louis to break the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis’s monopoly on the area’s railroad traffic. Money ran out before the bridge approaches could be finished, however, and the bridge did not open until 1917, and then only to automobile traffic. Railroad traffic would not use the bridge’s lower deck until 1928. The bridge was initially called the “St. Louis Municipal Bridge” and known popularly as the “Free Bridge.” Tolls were added for auto traffic beginning in 1932. In 1942 the bridge was renamed for Douglas MacArthur. The MacArthur Bridge was one of several bridges in St. Louis which carried U.S. Highway 66 until the completion of the nearby Poplar Street Bridge. At one time U.S. Highway 460 crossed the bridge, terminating on the west side of the bridge. In 1981 the bridge was closed to vehicles because of pavement deterioration and the western ramp approaches were torn out. The bridge is now in use only by railroads.  (Wikipedia)

Sure I love the bridge itself but the approach is…well, approachable. I’m sure most suburbanites don’t see the beauty I see. To them it is an eyesore that should be removed or replaced.

I’ve crossed this bridge once on Amtrak but I prefer seeing the structure from the area around 4th Street & Chouteau. When I’m driving in the area I hope for red lights just to be able to look at the structure longer. When I’m on the bus I get to look at it without worrying about being distracted.

Do you see what I see? Or do you just see rusted steel?

UPDATE:

I need to clarify my suburbanite vs urbanite thesis. Many urban dwellers have rejected New Urbanism because of it’s newness even though it is otherwise well designed and compact. Similarly “newness” is always included a criteria in suburban preference studies. One study in California looking at residents of traditional neighborhoods & suburban neighborhoods found: “Residents in suburban neighborhoods have a higher average score for the safety factor, and among the individual attributes, their average ratings are particularly higher for cul-de-sacs, newness, school quality, parking, and quiet.“ (emphasis added). I’ll dig into all the  large amount of literature and do a followup post.

 – Steve Patterson

We Need A Form-Based Code

On Monday the St. Louis Preservation Board approved the demolition of some buildings at the Pevely Dairy site but denied the two most critical, the corner structure and the smokehouse. Facebook & twitter were on fire afterwords with people celebrating. This is a victory but much work remains to be done to win the war. I’m personally tired of fighting small battle after small battle yet feel like we are losing the war on urbanism.

Saint Louis University President Lawrence Biondi has demonstrated for decades he doesn’t respect the public street. Under his leadership SLU has invested in millions on turning it’d back to public space. Green grass, fountains and sculpture are offered as a consolation prize for creating dull & lifeless public space. To me this is unacceptable. People I consider friends think the Pevely building should be razed — they see it as vacant and useless. I strongly disagree.   If they want vacant and useless they just need to look at the vast expanses of high-maintenance lawn across Grand.

Urban streets are defined by buildings on both sides with doors, windows and activities adjacent or near the sidewalk. When St. Louis was built this was the natural way of building since everyone was a pedestrian. Today we need to recognize that most are motorists and build in a way that works for both pedestrians and motorists. It doesn’t need to be one or the other, we can accommodate both.

If St. Louis had a form-based code in place for the city, or at least midtown, SLU wouldn’t have planned new construction set behind a lawn. They would have realized since they had to maintain the building line that it made sense to retain the corner structure all along. To move our city forward and become more urban and friendly to both pedestrians and motorists we must completely replace our zoning which was written to support urban renewal through the destruction of all things urban. The 1947 plan called for leveling & reconstruction of Soulard!

We must determine which corridors should be reurbanized and which, if any, will be allowed to be suburbanized. Let’s stop this continual piecemeal battle over individual buildings and properties.

– Steve Patterson

5th Ward Special Election Today

Today voters in the 5th ward will go to the polls to select one of three candidates to finish the term of former alderman April Ford-Griffin who resigned to take a city position.

Independent candidates Tonya Finley and Rose M. Green participated in the candidate forum last week. The Democratic nominee Tammika Hubbard confirmed two days prior but she didn’t participate. I expected to meet and hear from all three candidates. The volunteers from the League of Women Voters of St. Louis did an outstanding job with the two candidates  that took the time to show up.

I voted absentee last week, access to my new polling place via public transit would require me to cross 14th Street without a signalized crosswalk — too dangerous.

Turnout will be low for this election, very few people deciding who completes the term that ends in April 2013. This may cause me problems down the road for disclosing this but I voted for Tonya Finley in this election.

– Steve Patterson