Home » Featured » Recent Articles:

Wired Magazine: Roads Gone Wild

December 9, 2004 Featured Comments Off on Wired Magazine: Roads Gone Wild

In the US, traffic engineers are beginning to rethink the dictum that the car is king and pedestrians are well advised to get the hell off the road. In West Palm Beach, Florida, planners have redesigned several major streets, removing traffic signals and turn lanes, narrowing the roadbed, and bringing people and cars into much closer contact. The result: slower traffic, fewer accidents, shorter trip times. “I think the future of transportation in our cities is slowing down the roads,” says Ian Lockwood, the transportation manager for West Palm Beach during the project and now a transportation and design consultant. “When you try to speed things up, the system tends to fail, and then you’re stuck with a design that moves traffic inefficiently and is hostile to pedestrians and human exchange.”

Full Story

 

Report: St. Louis Region’s streets rank 17th most dangerous to pedestrians

December 8, 2004 Featured 1 Comment

The Surface Transportation Policy Project has released its findings on pedestrian safety from 1994-2003 in a new report, Mean Streets 2004 – How Far Have We Come? The St. Louis Region ranks 17th most dangerous and that our Pedestrian Danger Index increased 5.7% in 2002-2003. This is despite having the 3rd highest federal spending on pedestrian & bicycle projects for FY1998-2003 for an average of $1.56 per person. So we are spending the bucks but not getting the results!

From the report:
“Overall, the nation’s transportation networks have been largely designed to facilitate high speed automobile traffic, treating our communities and pedestrian safety as an afterthought. Streets designed with wide travel lanes and expansive intersections have been the norm or local zoning and parking requirements that don’t account for pedestrians and public transportation riders is too often standard practice. Private sector actors routinely design malls, shopping centers and housing for automobile access, without suitable facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists or transit users. Importantly, communities with a good design and a focus on features that support travel options from the start don’t have to be fixed later, reducing the dangers to pedestrians today and into the future.”

Mean Streets 2004 – How Far Have We Come? (40 page PDF)

Pedestrian Safety and Spending in Missouri (One page PDF)

APA Press Release, 12/2/2004

Walkable Communities – a great resource

Hopefully we as a region can do better at improving the walkability of our city & region. Spending the funds is not enough – we’ve got to think about how we are spending the money. We also need to stop building more sprawl and focus on rebuilding our existing communities.

– Steve

 

Subscribe to Urban Review St. Louis

December 7, 2004 Featured 5 Comments

If you’ve been on the edge of your seat wondering when I’m going to post my next critique of St. Louis then all you’ve got to do is subscribe. When you subscribe I will send you a short email with a link to the latest entry as soon as it is posted. Your email will not be sold or used for any other purpose.

If you wish to subscribe to receive these notices simply put “Subscribe” in the subject line. Use the link below:

Send email

Thanks for your continued interest and support!

– Steve

 

Gravois Plaza Less Pedestrian-Friendly than previous center

December 7, 2004 Featured 11 Comments

Gravois Plaza was completely rebuilt from the ground up in the last few years. The old shopping center dated to probably the 1960s and had an interesting courtyard space between a K-Mart and smaller stores. I can’t say it worked well – but it was different than most strip malls.

Basically, K-Mart got the boot in favor of a new Shop-N-Save grocery store. On the whole, the new Gravois Plaza is more attractive than the old. However, what we need to remember is almost anything new is apt to be better looking than something which is dated and poorly maintained. It is this newness that often masks underlying design flaws. Unfortunately, the new Gravois Plaza makes a number of big mistakes for an urban shopping area. First, check out the map link below to see the street pattern:


[ Yahoo! Maps ]

Map of
3861 Gravois Ave
St Louis, MO 63116-4657

Below is a photo looking East on Oleatha at Gravois Plaza – nothing but wall. The entire Western border of Gravois Plaza along Gustine remained unaltered from the old plaza – keeping the unfriendly wall.

gp_01.jpg

Most of the housing around Gravois Plaza is to the West & North of the development. However, entrances from the West & North are not provided except at the extreme corners to the South & East. But, this is one of the better urban neighborhoods so people do walk to the store. Unfortunately, Gravois Plaza was not designed to be accessed by foot.

gp_02.jpg

Walking along Gustine street along the west (above) the pedestrian is trapped between an overbearing wall and passing cars. Note, the sidewalk is right next to the street and you don’t have any parked cars or street trees to give you any feeling of protection.

gp_03.jpg

Above is the Southwest entrance to Gravois Plaza, looking out across Gustine and down Tholozan. If you look closely you see the sidewalk continues along Gustine but doesn’t enter Gravois Plaza. The grass is worn where pedestrians have cut through to create the shortest walk. Let’s turn around and head toward the grocery store.

gp_04.jpg

Above is what the pedestrian is faced with. You cross a large service drive for delivery trucks (where I am standing to take the picture) and ahead is a drive for CiCi’s Pizza. No sidewalk is provided so pedestrians must walk in the path of cars. Real inviting huh?

gp_05.jpg

The view above is continuing into Gravois Plaza as seen from the drive to the CiCi’s Pizza. You can see in this view a pedestrian walking toward the store along the driveway.

gp_06.jpg

Rounding the curve the Shop-N-Save comes into view. Here the pedestrian is forced to walk in the driveway again. But look close, the wrought iron fence designed to keep someone from falling down the change of level forces the pedestrian in the drive – they have no where to escape in case a car comes to close. Clearly, no thought was given to pedestrian access.

gp_07.jpg

The photo above was taken at the same position as the prior picture. This view is looking West & South where we just came from. As you can see by the worn grass, pedestrians have been walking on the tiny strip of grass between the drive and retaining wall. In the background you can see a pedestrian leaving Gravois Plaza with two full bags of groceries – forced to walk in the drive and unable to see cars approaching from behind.

gp_08.jpg

The view above is looking South from the Shop-N-Save with a US Bank branch in the background. Again, you can see how the fence keeps pedestrians in the driveway. Please note, the Bank and daycare center along Gravois were not part of the redevelopment – these remained unchanged.

I’m in this area 2-3 times per week and I have always seen pedestrians taking this unfriendly route. I guess one could take the attitude that people are walking anyway so what is the big deal. However, the message to people is clear – if you don’t have a car we really don’t give a shit about you. Sure, we don’t mind if you walk here to spend your money but don’t expect us to go out of our way to do anything for you.

In the meantime the parking lot is way too big and has so few trees it is almost comical. How is it TIF financing can be used to finance a project that is closed to the neighborhood to the West & North, is anti-pedestrian and is mostly paving? Our city must not have any codes requiring a connection to the neighborhood, pedestrian access and even something so basic as a reasonable level of landscaping.

The old Gravois Plaza, for all its faults, was more accessible to neighbors to the North. People could enter at Potomac & Gustine and enter the courtyard space. So while the new Gravois Plaza is cleaner and features a nice Shop-N-Save store it is less pedestrian-friendly than the old Gravois Plaza.

So what would I have done you ask? Well, I would have destroyed the wall along Gustine and connected the development to the neighborhood by regrading the site. To achieve a true connection to the surrounding neighborhoods I would have divided the site back into separate blocks divided by public streets. Hydraulic Street, the South entrance along Gravois, would be cut through all the way North to Potomac Street. Oleatha & Miami streets would be cut though between Gustine on the West to Bamberger on the East. This, of course, is completely counter to conventional thinking about shopping areas.

With all these new streets plenty of on-street parking could have been provided. Several small parking lots could be provided as necessary. Arguably, less total parking could have been provided as you’d have more people willing to walk from the adjacent neighborhoods. Ideally, some new housing would have been provided above some of the retail stores. Big Box stores like the Shop-N-Save have been integrated into more urban shopping areas in other cities – it takes a willingness on the part of the city to show developers & retailers the way. The smaller stores would easily fit within a new street-grid development.

A substantial amount of money was spend rebuilding Gravois Plaza but the area is not really a part of the city. It is a suburban shopping center imposed upon the city. This could have been so much more.

– Steve

 

St. Louis needs greater density

December 6, 2004 Featured 4 Comments

“Dense concentrations of people are one of the of the necessary conditions for flourishing city diversity.”

The above quote is from Jane Jacobs’ classic, ‘The Death and Life of Great American Cities.’ In chapter 11, ‘The need for concentration,’ Jacobs continues:

“One reason why low city densities conventionally have a good name, unjustified by the facts, and why high city densities have a bad name, equally unjustified, is that high densities of dwellings and and overcrowding of dwellings are often confused. High densities mean large numbers of dwellings per acre of land. Overcrowding means too many people in a dwelling for the number of rooms it contains.”

I think all too often in St. Louis this confusion abounds. The trend to convert two-family buildings to a single family structure is in part because of the false notion that we need to reduce densities. I hear it all the time. What do we accomplish by reducing the total number of dwellings in this fashion? We make it harder to create a vibrant & diverse city. While I don’t have any facts & figures in front of me I’d say we are probably only breaking even as far as dwellings are concerned. For every new house or loft constructed we are reducing a four-unit building to two or a two to a single. Downtown is gaining units while the other neighborhoods are losing needed density. This is not a good thing!

Back to Jane Jacobs, “In districts where densities are too low, they can be raised and variation increased by adding new buildings simultaneously in different, separated spots only. In short, densities should be raised – and new buildings introduced for this purpose – gradually rather than in some sudden, cataclysmic upheaval to be followed by nothing more for decades. “

Jacobs is not advocating wholesale destruction of neighborhoods to create high density housing – she is suggesting over time cities need to increase densities to a level to support a diverse & vibrant city life. The ideal place for increased density is near MetroLink stops – both current and future. Most city neighborhoods are low density and need more dwellings and people – not fewer.

Jacobs’ book will be discussed Sunday 12/12 at 1pm. The location is Grbic at 4071 Keokuk (@ Meramec).

– Steve

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe