Really!?! with Steve and Steve

Really Marlene Davis? You had no idea the developer wants to raze the existing 1960s flying saucer building? Really?

Really, you told me on the phone Wednesday nobody has mentioned demolition to you? Really!?!

Really, you introduce a board bill last week with the sentence “Demolition of the existing building in the Area is necessary and desirable to allow for redevelopment of the Area in accordance with the Plan” and then email me saying “the bill I presented today was for tax abatement”? Really!?!

Really, haven’t you heard of this thing called the internet?  You didn’t know people can easily fact check and compare notes? Really!?!

Wow! Really!?!

My apologies to Seth  & Amy.

Further reading:

• Del Taco to Close Tomorrow; But Board Bill May Actually Save Building
• Aldermen advance blighting, and tax abatement, of Del Taco
  
• That Googie on Grand and the fabric of a city

– Steve Patterson

Stastny: Grand Center Needs to be a Community, not a District

Last week I attended the Grand Center Master Plan Public Forum held at Powell Hall. Rather than email in my feedback I thought I’d post it here and email the committee a link to this post.

Background

Here are a few paragraphs from a recent press release to introduce you to the topic:

Top executives of Grand Center’s major institutions have taken a significant next step in the district’s redevelopment process by launching an initiative to create a master plan for the Grand Center District. The plan will address such areas as recommendations regarding land use, zoning possibilities and design guidelines.

At the request of Grand Center Inc. and several key executives of district institutions, Mayor Francis G. Slay has asked 30 institutional, business and community leaders to serve on a Planning Committee to create a common vision for the next phase of development in Grand Center. To achieve that goal, a Steering Committee made up of 14 members of the Planning Committee agreed to engage Donald Stastny, the Portland, Ore.-based, award-winning architect and urban designer, to lead the creation of an overall vision and implementation plan.

The goal of the initiative is to develop a long-range vision for the Grand Center District that is commonly created, enabling a shared ownership. The plan will be based on the input of the cultural institutions, community organizations, businesses, residents and patrons who visit the district as well as interested citizens throughout the region.

Stastny is not new to St. Louis. Last year, he and his team led the process that resulted in the selection of lead designer Michael Van Valkenburg and museum planner and architect Scott Newman to create a new master plan for the Gateway Arch grounds. Visit www.stastnybrun.com for more information about the firm.

The planning process is expected to wrap up over the summer with a presentation of the final master plan in the fall.

Selected Institutions/Venues

• Fox Theater
• Saint Louis University
• Jazz St. Louis
• St. Louis Symphony
• Urban League of Metropolitan St. Louis
• Scottish Rite
• Moto Museum
• St. Louis Public Radio
• Nine Network of Public Media
• Grand Center Arts Academy
• Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis
• Big Brothers Big Sisters of Eastern Missouri
• Cardinal Ritter College Prep
• The Black Repertory Company
• Third Baptist Church
• KDHX Community Media
• Craft Alliance
• The Pulitzer Foundation for the Arts
• St. Louis VA Medical Center – John Cochran Division
• The Sheldon

Presentation

Donald Stastny began by contradicting the very people that hired him! He said Grand Center should be viewed as a community, not a district. Grand Center’s marketing of late has been all about making the area a district.  Stastny said his work is not to produce a master plan with a “pretty picture” but a framework for the community to evolve.  I agree with this approach, our long held notions of master plan is you build what the pretty pictures show, no matter how many years or decades later. Thinking instead, about desired outcomes and processes that allow an area to grow and evolve organically. Cities, including St. Louis, didn’t start with a pretty picture. They slowly evolved over time.

Stastny took several jabs at the amount of parking already in the area as well as local views on needing more parking, free especially. Hopefully he will be able to get institutions to share parking and to “connect the dots” by reducing the visual impact of the numerous large surface parking lots.

Stastny said the center point is Grand & Washington, showing a circle with a radius of 1/4 mile, the distance pedestrians are generally willing to walk. With that he said focusing attention to the public realm on Grand from Olive to Delmar and three east-west transects (Delmar, Washington & Delmar) made sense.

My bullet points

ok, here are my thoughts.

• Drop the name Grand Center, go back to Midtown.
• If you go a 1/4 mile from each of the individual institutions that someone may visit you get a much larger area (see map below). This is too large to do detailed streetscape drawings but typical street sections can be suggested that could be used for the entire area. Areas outside the planning area will never get any planning attention.
• Talk about the key elements needed to connect the dots so these can be applied to the larger area: wider sidewalks, building walls serving as walls to the outdoor room, etc. With that in place we can work to improve Grand north to Page and south to MetroLink on the new viaduct.
• Transit will be a key to reducing the massive parking lots. MetroLink at the south edge of my map (below) and four bus lines (#10, #70, #94, #97) serve the area. If the #70 and an east-west line became enhanced routes, with fewer stops & greater frequency, more people will use transit rather than drive their vehicles.
• Despite the neatly cut grass, walking along Grand through SLU is dull.  Sidewalks with no street trees to separate the pedestrian from passing vehicles and block after block of fencing that screams “keep out.”
• Breaking up the long blocks west of Grand makes sense but but eyes need to watch these pedestrian connector routes.
• Not crazy about using alleys for pedestrian circulation. The alley is a great asset for services such as the collection of recycling and trash.
• Also not crazy about having the ability to close Grand from Olive to Delmar too easily.  Doing so creates havoc for transit riders and motorists.

Okay readers, add your thoughts below so the committee and professionals from Stastny’s office can read them.

– Steve Patterson

Pros & Cons of Saving the 1960s Flying Saucer at Grand & Forest Park

Uh oh, the modern preservationists are gearing up to try to save another interesting, but highly anti-pedestrian, building.  Yes, the fight is on the save a gas station turned drive-thru taco stand at 212 S. Grand.  With a few exceptions, commercial modernism translates to brutal and outright hostile to pedestrians but lovingly embracing all in single occupant vehicles.

Developer Rick Yackey plans to demolish the distinctive flying-saucer-shaped Del Taco at N. Grand and Forest Park Parkway, near St. Louis University, and replace it with new retail buildings, a city development official said Tuesday.

The St. Louis Land Clearance Redevelopment Authority approved a blighting and redevelopment plan for the building, which was built to be a Phillips 66 gas station. The plan, said LCRA staffer Dale Ruthsatz, is to knock down the Del Taco replace it with a more pedestrian-oriented retail building of 3,500 to 7,000 square feet. (STLtoday.com)

The Del Taco at the SE corner of Grand & Forest Park, is not one of the few exceptions.

You can see from the above photo that razing of buildings in the Mill Creek Valley began at Grand Ave & Forest Park by 1958. Grand Ave had the #70 streetcar starting in 1895 so the length from North to South was very active and designed for pedestrians.  It was the modernists that actively destroyed the pedestrian-friendly city to usher in the auto-friendly city. Why do people want to save that which destroyed the city?

Granted, I love many modern buildings.  Their simple forms, the absence of applied decoration, the use of materials other than red brick, all make forms often pleasing to my eye.  My favorite architect is Bruce Goff (1904-1982), but thankfully the bulk of his work was on private residences. Like his contemporaries, his (unbuilt) commercial projects were an assault on the pedestrian: non-active walls, large setbacks, etc.

When I read  developer Rick Yackey wants to construct “a more pedestrian-oriented retail building” I thought of several things:

1. More pedestrian-friendly anything is needed around the Saint Louis University campus. You’d think the university has only been around 5 years judging by the adjacent activity level.
2. It doesn’t take much to be more pedestrian-friendly than the existing Del Taco.
3. The developer had the opportunity to make the adjacent Council Plaza building more pedestrian-friendly during a recent renovation project but instead the situation is worse, something I didn’t think was possible.

Based on the developer’s record with Council Plaza I have little confidence any replacement would be pedestrian-friendly. Before removing a highly unique building I’d like to see controls in place to ensure the 9 acre site becomes pedestrian-friendly.  Saying a project will be pedestrian-friendly and actually delivering a pedestrian-friendly completed project are

I like the Del Taco building, it makes me smile when I’m in my car driving by or even at the drive-thru window but the entire nine acre Council Plaza site makes me furious as a pedestrian.  It should be noted that the unfriendly site planning that exists can change without altering the historic composition of buildings. We can improve the walkability and accessibility while leaving the buildings intact.

I won’t lose any sleep if the Del Taco is razed but I will be mad as hell if some generic anti-pedestrian strip mall is built in it’s place. We do have a unique collection of five buildings that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

But hey the developer needs retail space, that’s important too, right? But if the demand is so great why is every retail space in the renovated Plaza Council building vacant?

I can picture the Del Taco structure gone, replaced with a high-design modernist structure to compliment the other buildings. But I don’t think that’s what we’ll get.  Instead I picture a generic strip mall not connected to the public sidewalk on Grand or to other buildings on the site. The loss of such a great building can only be offset with a great building. Show me the designs, with proof it will be pedestrian-friendly, and I’m willing to listen. Until then not a chance!

If I were developing this site I’d use the Del Taco building as a draw. Renovate the building and accenting it with great lighting, new pedestrian-friendly site design connecting to a new structure to the east on the existing surface parking lot. I can see the building not as a fast food joint but as a pub with a focus on great outdoor patio seating. This could become THE corner where SLU students hang out.

Most developers would kill to have such a widely known building to attract customers to their development!  Certainly the 24 hour drive-thru is nice after you leave the bar but let’s face it, the use of the building can easily change.  Thousands on Facebook want to save the building, although some want to also save the fast food chain currently operating within the building. An online petition has been started as well to save the building.

Razing this building makes zero sense no matter how you try to look at it, believe me I tried!  Board Bill 188 (redevelopment bill) has been assigned to the Housing, Urban Development & Zoning committee. I’m sure all 12 committee members would love to hear from citizens via email, fax, text, twitter or phone prior to the hearing at 10am Wednesday morning.

– Steve Patterson

Castle Ballroom: “Exclusively for the Best Colored People of St. Louis”

Segregation meant blacks had to duplicate all the establishments that were not open to them, including dance halls. One such place was the Castle Ballroom on Olive & 29th (now T.E. Huntley).

Across the street to the south is the Mill Creek Valley Urban Renewal area. This 454-acre tract was the result of a clearance project which razed one of the city’s densest African American neighborhoods beginning in 1959. The low-rise community called Laclede Town was built south of the ballroom in the early 1960s; after subsequent expansions, it was closed in the 1980s and later razed. The property now belongs to the Sigma Chemical Company; most of it is open space. In this context, the Castle can be understood as one of a few remaining buildings with significant associations with the population of Mill Creek Valley.

The nomination to the National Register of Historic Places, quoted above, was written by Lynn Josse.

I’d passed by this building thousands of times over the last 20 years but I had no clue to it’s history.  Again from the nomination:

For the purposes of the National Register, the most significant space in the building is the ballroom, which retains integrity. The dance floor, balcony, stage, even much of the plaster and woodwork are largely intact. Although some of the elements may not reflect the 1908 appearance, nearly all are original to the pre-1954 period of significance.

Thankfully the “pent roof” that was added to modernized the building has now been removed.  I can picture new storefront’s and the building occupied again.

Our buildings have so much history, it just takes someone to bring it to our attention.  In my case it was my friend Leigh Maibes, who has the property listed for sale. I’ve seen dark pictures of the ballroom space but without power I wasn’t able to see inside in person (walking is difficult enough for me in well lit spaces).

The renovation of midtown is moving east and downtown is moving west, in a few years they will meet along Washington, Locust or Olive.  Hopefully all three within a decade.

– Steve Patterson

New Boutique Hotel in Midtown Has Bicycles for Guest Use

I was excited to see the two Electra Townie bikes on a recent visit to check out the new 49-room Hotel Ignacio in midtown St. Louis. Registered guests can check out the bikes at no additional charge.

I will take a look at the pedestrian connections around the hotel next week but I couldn’t hold my excitement about the guest bikes.

– Steve Patterson