Home » Downtown »History/Preservation » Currently Reading:

Busch Stadium: Out With the Old, In With the New

November 14, 2005 Downtown, History/Preservation 6 Comments

busch1.jpg

The latest spectator sport in St. Louis is the demolition of the 1960s Busch Stadium designed by Edward Durell Stone. Every day you can see people lining 8th Street taking pictures and watching the demolition. To maintain their tight schedule demolition continues into the evening hours as well.

Friday night when I passed by on my scooter I got to see an amazing sight. The wrecking ball just hit a large section of the old stadium and a falling exterior column took out a scissor lift on the site. Ouch, expensive mistake.

Many are upset to see the modern stadium go in favor of the new retro stadium. In a post last month I listed buildings I’d raze before the old Busch. The circular form of the old stadium was one of its best features. The arches were unique and looked great at night. Other than that, I was not so impressed.

The old stadium was not a good urban neighbor. The harsh forms & materials did not invite anyone to look and touch. The building was not pedestrian friendly. The arches, the one redeeming feature, were too far removed from the sidewalk to compensate for the lack of interest otherwise presented to the outsider. The design never mattered much on game day because of all the people, it is those non-game days when empty that it took life away from the area. Sorry all you folks that love the old stadium, I’m not going to miss it.

But what about the new stadium?

Well, I’m over the whole red brick with black metal retro stadium look exemplified by the new Busch and countless other stadiums across the country built in the last 10 years. The whole notion of building something new trying to pass itself off as being from a century earlier makes me noxious nauseous. That having been said, I think the new stadium will accomplish a number of positive things the old stadium could not.

First, by constructing the new stadium closer to the highway it leaves room downtown for the “ballpark village,” a mixed-use development. This should help repair part of downtown torn apart in the 60’s. The new Busch is still bigger than a city block and therefore messes with the street grid. However, it recognizes the grid. Entrances on 8th Street and Broadway are aligned with Spruce, a subtle but important design element.

The new design will also be more inviting on non-game days. Despite what people may think, the inviting aspect will not come from the red brick and retro details. Instead it will come from generally pleasing massing and texture. With the new ballpark village and more activity at Cupples Station, the new stadium will have more activity around it on non-game days.

In time the new stadium will become beloved. Just not the same as the old stadium it replaces. The generic retro look is just too commonplace to set this stadium apart from all the other red brick retro buildings filling our city and others.

– Steve

 

Currently there are "6 comments" on this Article:

  1. Matt says:

    My thoughts axactly. Good to see I’m not the only one that didn’t care for the old Busch.

    Now I know why there was a crushed lift sitting on a trailer down there yesterday also.

     
  2. Matt says:

    Forgot to add a story that can top yours. I saw a wrecking ball fly off the crane yesterday and fly into busch stadium and then I was told that it went out the other side almost on to the new scoreboard in the new stadium.

     
  3. Jim Zavist says:

    The retro stadia shouldn’t make you noxious, just nauseous . . . you were probably already noxious!

    [REPLY – Thanks for the correction, I’ve edited the entry above. I hate it when I’m in a hurry and the spell checker doesn’t know the word I want… – SLP]

     
  4. LMS says:

    I suspect in ten years or so, people will be nostalgic for the old round stadiums again and teams will tear down the new retro stadiums. Speaking of stadiums, I think the Jones Dome leaves allot to be desired especially the interior. No personality. I think a clear story to let light in, like they’ve done in Detroit, would make it much more appealing.

     
  5. DR says:

    I wonder what a Rem Koolhaas designed stadium would look like – that’s what St. Louis should have built.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe