Home » Local Business »Planning & Design »Politics/Policy »St. Louis County » Currently Reading:

City To Blight An Entire Block Downtown

When you first read the headline you probably assumed the City of St. Louis, right? Wrong. The city faced with blight in their downtown is the City of Clayton. Don’t let the expensive restaurants and valet parking fool you, Clayton is full of blight. So much so they are ready to give tax breaks to a company already located in Clayton.

From a KSDK story:

When you think of blight, crumbling buildings probably come to mind. But what about a bustling block in the heart of downtown Clayton?

It is all part of a plan to grant a tax break. The city wants to declare one block “blighted” so a corporation can expand its headquarters. But, Clayton has never granted tax abatement in the past. And some small business owners say it shouldn’t start now. David Danforth says, “The notion that we have blight here in Clayton is ridiculous.”

The block in question is bordered by Forsyth, Hanley and Carondelet. The Centene Corporation’s existing building sits here. It is also where the healthcare company would like to expand their corporate headquarters.

The city of Clayton wants to help them do that through tax abatement. The first step would be to declare the area blighted. Clayton Mayor Ben Uchitelle says, “Some of the properties along Forsyth are old and the Library Limited property has been vacant for five years.”

The proposal is this: Centene would get a 50% tax abatement for 12 years. They would promise to create 800 new jobs. And they say they would generate $20-million dollars in new property taxes.

Mayor Uchitelle says, “We’ve heard the argument that this would open the floodgates but we don’t think so. We think the effect of this will be to improve properties all around and make other development possible.”

For the Clayton School District, this presents a dilemma. They worry that future developers will also expect tax breaks. Still, they stand to gain $490-thousand dollars a year, even after the abatement. Board President Steve Singer says, “That is our central concern: the issue of precedent. And frankly, the city has made a very good case to us.”

But it is small business owners who stand to lose the most. This whole strip will likely be bought out in the deal. Business owner David Danforth says, “I think the notion that they need to blight private property owners in order to somehow subsidize their development is wrong.” Danforth and others on Forsyth plan to fight this development before the blighting issue goes to vote.

I had dinner last night a few blocks away from the blight. I didn’t see any boarded up windows or anything but with all that blight I was careful as I walked from my car to the restaurant. If something happened because of the blight would the valet across the street parking someone’s Range Rover be able to help? Doubtful. As I left the restaurant I drove past the blighted block, doors locked of course. What amazed me were some of the businesses located among the blight — a couple of high-end restaurants, some fast food places in urban storefronts, a fancy jeweler, a title company, and two real estate brokerages. Clayton’s blighted area contains an interesting mix of building types and materials. Maybe that is why it is considered blight — because it is not one big long boring block like so many of the others in downtown Clayton. Could it be blighted due to the fact MetroLink mass transit will come to Clayton in about a year. Perhaps the critics of mass transit are just getting ahead of the curve and blighting areas before mass transit arrives rather than waiting and blaming it on the type of ‘element’ that doesn’t have their own Lexus?

The City of Clayton should not blight this block for a number of reasons. First, this is a big block with multiple buildings that adds interest to an otherwise sterile area. Second, just because the area doesn’t have a brand new building on it doesn’t make it blighted!!! I really wanted to use an expletive in that last sentence — took all my strength not too.

Those of us in the City of St. Louis should look for the positive side to all this. Clayton’s old buildings can’t even come close to competing with the old buildings we have left. Also, we are on the upswing with a number of new condo projects not receiving tax abatement. Looks like the tables have just been turned.

– Steve

 

Currently there are "8 comments" on this Article:

  1. charles says:

    Speaking of blight, what about the Drurys getting tax abatement for their hotel at Hampton and 44?

    Did they get any incentives to build at Olive and 270?

    Were their costs lower in Creve Couer?

    Are the room rates lower in the city?

     
  2. Brian says:

    What’s odd about this block too is that it contains a City of Clayton structured parking facility. I guess these ridiculously abused loopholes would have us believe the City of Clayton actually contributed to its own blight?!

     
  3. julia says:

    One reason there are empty storefronts is because property owners are demanding insane prices for their buildings. A company I used to work for considered buying one in 1999 but acquisition and renovation costs were prohibitive; it sits empty today.

     
  4. Matt M. says:

    I work in a building in this very blighted block. I suppose the attorneys were tired of stepping over bums and watching helplessly as our building crumbled away–because we’re moving to Richmond Heights now!

    No, but seriously, this block (I’m at 7751 Carondelet in the ugly eight story “Clayton Tower”) isn’t all that bad. They really should blight the huge surface parking lot between Central and Bemiston and build a high rise there to truly beef up the area.

    We really are moving our offices from this location to one off of Big Bend and 40, but it’s only because the rent is quite inflated at this point.

     
  5. pogo says:

    Unfortunately, since the loss of The Library Limited. The block may be construed as “Blighted”. (At least to me). What a loss.

     
  6. cheesyrealtor says:

    I work on this block too. Indeed it is dificult for me to leave the safe confines of my south city nabe and risk my personal safety on the means streets of Clayton.

    After sitting vacant for sometime Centene just made substantial modifications to this building in order to gain occupancy. How is that for senselessness?

    There oughta be a law, oh wait…

     
  7. Ben Jones says:

    My bigger question in all this, Steve, is why the hell you were eating dinner in Clayton?

    Hopefully, it was at least someplace interesting, like Pomme.

    No other restaurant in the area is worth visiting that scary a neighborhood, at least when it comes to the general snobbery robbery is that high priced, unimaginative food scene. I add the caveat – unless the scene has improved in the last three to five years.

    [REPLY – i was returning St. Louis from a meeting in Creve Coeur so it was on the way. I don’t do the fancy places much — at least not when I’m buying. I stopped at ZuZu Mexican because it is affordable and fast. BTW, ZuZu has recently opened a downtown location. – SLP]

     
  8. nemo31 says:

    The only reason they would want to call the area blighted is a precurser to eminent domain. They just cant take the property. Fair compensation is still required. If I were the present owner my compenated value would be the near future worth of the property. Lost business, emloyees lost wages if I loss business and had to lay-off someone, higher transportation cost. Project all cost over a number of years. Intellectual property rights. It takes brain power to build a business. The Supreme Court decision on Kelo does not give carte blanch. This abatement stuff is almost as bad as stadium projects.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe