Home » Environment »Public Transit »Transportation »Travel » Currently Reading:

Oklahoma City About to Abandon Chance for Excellent Mass Transit System

November 16, 2005 Environment, Public Transit, Transportation, Travel 6 Comments

okcplatform.jpg

No, this is not Urban Review Oklahoma City. But I do return to my hometown a few times a year and keep tabs on what is happening there. Besides, we can learn from looking at other city’s successes or, in this case, mistakes.

At right is the remains of a once great rail system serving central Oklahoma. Like most cities of any size, Oklahoma City had streetcars to serve urban transportation needs. Back in the day a number of municipalities dotted the countryside around OKC and these were served by the “Interurban” rail service.

Behind OKC’s Union Station are these twelve tracks. Yes, twelve. Three long platforms, like the one shown in the foreground, served six of the twelve lines. Passengers entered the Union Station and took underground tunnels beneath the tracks and then came up through stairways to get to their platform.

The platforms had long canopies protecting passengers from the sun and bad weather. It appears to have been a great system, capable of serving many passengers. These platforms and tracks will soon be gone.




okcunionstation.jpg

At left is OKC’s Union Station, a building I’ve admired since I was very young. It is located at 300 SW 7th (google map), just behind the main post office. This magnificent building, dating to 1930, is not in any danger. Well, it is not going to be destroyed. What will be destroyed is the reason it exists — to serve the passenger transportation needs for greater Oklahoma City.

It was the rise of the private automobile, and GM conspiring to replace streetcar lines with buses, that brought rail service to an end in Oklahoma City and nearly every other city across the country. Cheap gas, flashy cars and sprawling subdivisions dotted with ranch houses was all the rage.

Some in OKC have been advocating to use the existing rights of way to bring back mass transit to Oklahoma City and to re-connect to suburbs such as Norman, location of the University of Oklahoma. But it will not be.


The lure of the private auto will kill future prospects for this once booming passenger rail hub. A short section of Interstate 40 (I-40), known as the “crosstown expressway” will be relocated through the rail line. Once complete, only one rail line will remain (for freight service).

A group fighting the highway project destroying the rail lines has a pretty lame website. Their website is not effective but some of the links and editorials do provide some valuable information.

Planning officials say the existing highway is over capacity, was not designed properly and is in need of replacement. So $360 million later about 5 miles of highway will be completely relocated. I have to admit that removing a two-level highway immediately next to downtown is probably good but I’m not fond of wide trenches with even more lanes. OKC is the very definition of sprawl so I think it would do wise to consider adopting a good mass transit system before it is too late ($5/gallon gas from peak oil).


One last bit of information.

Since 1990 the old Union Station building has been used as offices for COTPA: The Central Oklahoma Transportation and Parking Authority, aka Metro Transit. The metropolitan bus company! Strangely, the same authority that handles bus service is also responsible for managing downtown parking. Seems like a conflict of interest to me.

Here is the best part, they are conducting a “fixed guideway study” for a possible combination of express buses, HOV lanes, light rail and modern streetcars. Most of their proposed corridors already have a rail right of way connecting behind their own offices.

– Steve

 

Currently there are "6 comments" on this Article:

  1. Scott says:

    I love the OKC Union Station. Handsome building. Too bad they are not going to use it as a transit hub. Sounds familiar…..

     
  2. Jim Zavist says:

    Whereas in Denver, the Regional Transportation District has purchased Union Station and is in the midst of selecting a development team to create an intermodal transfer facility at their Union Station, much in the original model here . . . http://www.denverunionstation.org/

     
  3. Claire is cranky! says:

    Scott already said what I was going to say. Somebody should bring these “planners” to Saint Louis and give them a tour of the depressing mess that Union Station has become since mall planners voted to remove its function as a train station. Who knows, maybe if it doesn’t change their minds, at least one of the birds that now lives inside the broken mall will make a mess on one of their lunches?

     
  4. Matt says:

    AMTRAK pulled out several years before Union Station was ever converted. Mistake, yes, but they are never coming back. Union Station in St. Louis is a terminal, so trains have to back in. AMTRAK will onlay do that in cities like Chicago were there is a large amount of train traffic. Now, if we had a real train system in this country, Union Station should be reopened for trains.

    The OKC station should definately be used for trains though.

     
  5. Claire (not cranky now) says:

    “AMTRAK pulled out several years before Union Station was ever converted.”

    There was quite a bit of discussion about putting it back when the mall conversion was finished, but the folks putting together the mall thought that Amtrak would not bring in the kind of people they wanted in their high-end mall. They actually said that openly in meetings on the topic.

     
  6. At one time, trains did have to back into the old St. Louis Union Station. The new one, which is not much more than a doublewide, is alongside the tracks linking Chicago to Kansas City and Little Rock. Through trains can run through. In Chicago, all Amtrak trains again head into Union Station.

    I wasn’t aware Oklahoma City’s station was that big, although with the Santa Fe retrenching in the late 1960s and the Frisco quitting before then, the platform tracks and the headhouse were likely in pretty sad shape by the time Amtrak first began using the station in 1971.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe