Vinyl Windows & Cornice Trim Do Not “Improve” Our Architecture
I was furious Monday evening. The City’s Preservation Board nearly voted to allow a home owner to keep the ugly & inappropriate vinyl windows he installed in a home located in a local historic district without the required building permit. I say nearly because it took some strong arguing from members Richard Callow and Anthony Robinson to convince Melanie Fathman to vote to require the replacement. Not surprising was that Mary ‘One’ Johnson and Luis Porrello voted to allow the owner to keep the windows in place.
This case involved an owner that moved to the city from University City. He indicated the old cornice was rotted and the windows were old and original. The cornice had a wonderful large dentil block and a nice wide soffit. The board behind the dentils was apparently rotten so the owner decides to rip it all down and put up a vinyl wrapped cornice instead. For dentils he was going to apply some vinyl ones that were in no way reminiscent of the originals.
The vinyl windows, like all vinyl windows, do not look like a wood window. I want to repeat that: No vinyl window looks like a wood window does. Period.
You may get the same pattern of six “lites” over one “lite” but that is about as close as you can get. The remaining details are way off due to the materials and how they are put together. A vinyl window has much thinner rails on the sash. The window is also considerably thinner than a wood window which means the plane of the glass is virtually that of the frame. The muntin dividers (aka grills) in vinyl windows are either the interior snap-in type or the ones that go between the glass. Again, this gives a very flat look. The vinyl wrap applied over the original brick wood mold in the openings also looses considerable detail in the process. And, vinyl windows even if custom fitted still end up reducing the overall opening. Only on rare occasions have I seen vinyl windows installed in one of our old buildings that looks halfway decent.
Part of the debate at the Preservation Board centered around the window installation contractors that install windows. In this case I think the owner did this to himself but often it is the fault of the contractors. The owner assumes the professional window installer is going to get a permit, if necessary, and follow all codes including any historic codes. Sorry folks, most often that is not the case. It is the owner’s responsibility to verify that all codes are being followed.
If you are not sure if you need a permit or, if you are in a historic district that requires exterior changes to be reviewed by the neighborhood and/or Preservation board, then you need to make phone call or two before you start your work. Don’t blame your contractor, especially if they are from the county.
In many cases if the home owner had contacted either the neighborhood association or the city’s building division they could have easily determined the requirements and avoided a situation of having installed windows that must now be removed. Appropriate wood windows are far more costly than vinyl windows. No doubt about it. That is why I still have original wood windows with metal storms on my place.
The Preservation Board all agreed to tell the homeowner he must rebuild the cornice in wood —- no vinyl wrapped ill-proportioned knock off. But when it came to the windows some members were content with requiring the removal of the vinyl wrap but leaving the windows. First, this shows a lack of understanding of window installation. Had they permitted the windows to be left but removing the trim wrap we would have seen gaps where the windows were slightly different sizes from the openings. It is possible to install vinyl windows into an original wood opening but it has to be planned from the start. If they had voted to require just the wrap removal it would have ended up looking worse, which would be hard to do.
Another issue I have with vinyl windows is the color — bright white. Boy do these stick out like a sore thumb. White trim is a very post WWII or early colonial thing, mostly inappropriate for St. Louis’ architecture. Our wood windows often had dark green window sashes with the window trim in another color. White lead paint became popular in the 1930s but before that white paint was a rarity in St. Louis. New wood windows come in some great colors including some nice tans & greens as well as black. When you have dark masonry building a bright white window simply creates way too much contrast. With a cheap vinyl window in white you are drawing attention to something better off not noticed. So please folks, save the white windows (wood or vinyl) for the colonial boxes in the suburbs.
What really got me going during the meeting was Mary ‘One’ Johnson’s comments how this would have been avoided if the neighborhood had informed the owner what could and couldn’t be done prior to any work starting. Ms. Johnson, a fellow REALTOR®, expects neighborhood associations to monitor property tax records to see if any home in their area has sold so that they can make sure owner doesn’t screw up the house. WTF? As REALTORS® we have pretty good access to tax records, much better than the general public. However, it would still be a time consuming process to look up each and every property in a neighborhood to see if it has changed hands. And how often is enough? Every month? Every week? Every day? Even just tracking those properties that are for sale could be a daunting task for any volunteer neighborhood association to take on.
Others on the PB asked if it was not the responsibility of the real estate agents. Some thought the title work should indicate such things. Well, sorry, it does not. And when we see the title work it is during the closing of the sale, not prior. But, I do think agents representing a buyer should help direct their clients to information on historic districts and building permits if they have reason to believe the buyer will be making some changes.
But the responsibility is really with the owner, not the contractors, neighbors or real estate agents. The owner is responsible for their own home.
If you want a really low maintenance home buy something newer. If you want a wonderful historic home with relatively low maintenance make sure you don’t paint the brick, do a great job restoring & painting the wood trim and get really good clad wood windows. If that is too much to deal with I suggest renting or buying a condo. Just don’t come into my city thinking bright white vinyl windows is an improvement.
– Steve
Though I can agree that wood windows do look nicer than vinyl, I’m still glad to have the full range of choices on my home, since living in a non-historic area of the City (North Hampton). I think this added burden may largely be why Southwest City still lacks historic districts.
The City, neighborhood associations, realtors, window companies have done a misrable job of educating current and new owners alike about the responsibilities of living in an historic district. Perhaps one of the foundations would support a media campaign about informing the public about how to avoid these problems. I think most people would like to do the right thing, but perhaps don’t know or have the discerning eye of someone like Steve to see the error of their ways.
What’s all the more confusing is the standards are different from district-to-district, and only applicable within LOCAL historic districts.
If you’re in an area – like Benton Park West/Gravois Park/Dutchtown, for example – that’s ‘only’ a National HD but not a Local one, you don’t have to comply with any such standards, unless you apply for historic tax credits.
Many slumlords and low-budget rehabbers in this area continue to put in crappy-looking vinyl windows, and there are no consequences. I’m pretty sure replacement windows outside a Local HD do not require a building permit at all, so there’s not even a check to see if they’re filling in the top curved part of the windows. Sometimes, you see folks (sometimes low-income homeowners, but more likely cheap landlords) who fill in the windows several inches around and install tiny little cheap vinyl windows.
I’d like to have more energy efficient windows, but I want to uphold historic standards, regardless of whether I ultimately apply for tax credits. Unfortunately, most people don’t care, and even one or two houses with stupid looking vinyl windows can make the whole block look bad.
Is anyone surprised anymore at M1J’s antics? I know why she’s on the board, but it’s really a disgrace…
I like this post Steve because you hit on two of my biggest pet-peeves: white vinyl windows and real estate agents who know nothing about preservation issues. I agree with you that it is ultimately the responsibility of the owner to determine what historic district they are in, and what that means to them. But it is shocking how little many realtors, and often even architects, know about things like architectural styles and historic districts. Why aren’t realtors expected to have at least some knowledge of preservation laws to get their license? Of course it would seem to me that if I was a realtor the first thing I would do is find out if the property I was selling was in a district, and what that means to the buyer. I would think being in a district, and being eligible for tax credits, would be a huge selling point for the buyer. But it often seems like realtors know nothing about things like tax credits. I don’t mean to pick on realtors, because there are obviously some very good ones, and Steve would be the exact kind of realtor I would look for. But it seems to be an ongoing problem, buyer says realtor didn’t tell them about the district, realtor didn’t know anything about districts, etc.
I live in Southampton and WISH they’d put restrictions on window replacements here. Just because 1930’s gingerbreads (and other styles)aren’t considered historic yet, doesn’t mean that in the mean time people should be allowed to rape and pillage them. It’s alot harder to undo crappy rehab attempts…there’s evidence of this all over the neighborhood, and I literally cringe as I pass by them. I’ve actually considered putting in a deed restriction when I sell my house that would disallow for vinyl windows, it aggravates me so much.
Southampton is already eligible for historic district status.
Pursuing it would require support of the aldermen for the ward, the neighborhood organization, and neighborhood residents.
Given the deteriorating condition of some of the rental property in the neighborhood, historic rehab tax credits might be needed to stablize some of the building stock.
Federer’s old “Chippewa Lofts” building at Lawn and Chippewa is a prime example.
Even the Avalon would likely be considered a contributing historic building, eligible for historic tax credits.
Here’s your challenge Shannon: Good luck convincing the elderly and police officer- influenced crowd on the merits of historic district status.
And without their support, guess where you are with the aldermen…
I’ve always wondered, what happens to people who live in an area before it becomes an historic district? Are they immediately required to make their property conform to the standards that just passed? Some people don’t have homes for investment purposes and aren’t worried about the easing the jobs of future rehabbers. Their homes are for living in, and some of those people have to buy cheaper products to replace broken or failing parts of their home simply because it’s all they can afford. It seems cold to just say that they should just move to protect the historic look and integrity of the neighborhood.
Or is that even an issue? By the time a neighborhood considers historic status, have the bulk of the homes already been purchased by people who can reasonably be expected to purchase quality doors and windows regardless of the cost?
Not trying to start a class warfare debate or anything. I’m just curious.
[REPLY – When historic district standard come into place is doesn’t require any action to comply — what exists is grandfathered in. The standards apply to new changes. In my experience the standards can lesson the burden on the poor. How is that you ask? Well, I see many so-called poor folks or those on limited incomes seeking to “improve” their homes after they’ve received the 100th postcard on new vinyl windows or soffit or they see a neighbor do it and then want to keep up with the Jones.
The funny thing is vinyl windows are not always cheap, at least in terms of price. I have an aunt & uncle in Texas that put in new windows and had their small home sided. My father, who does window & door installation in Oklahoma, was shocked at the price they paid. “They could have had nice wood windows for that price,” was his response.
Another thing that happens is the window salesmen sells the unsuspecting buyer on the divided muntin look when the original wood windows were just one over one.
People are also quick to chuck their original front door for an ugly new steel door with the garish gold leaded glass. Yuk! Keep the original door, lubricate the hardware, add a new threshold and replace the weatherstripping. Cheaper and much better to look at. – SLP]
I own a 114 year old home and have energy efficient vinyl windows. The bricks on the house were painted when I bought it, and I recently had them repainted. I have synthetic roofing shingles–not slate. The millwork I had was all beat up, and instead of refurbishing it, I purchased mass-produced baseboards and crowns from home depot. Horror of horors: I put up a 6 foot vinyl privacy fence!
Everyone who comes to my house has complimented me and my wife on the improvements. It may be less reflective of historic standards than some of the ‘ghetto’ properties on the block, it it is vastly improved and will sell for more. I should point out, that the house next to mine is a modern archictectural experiment in cubism that seems to have no cohesion with the rest of the homes on the block–yet it has been applauded by Cultural Resources/Historic Preservation. Affirmative action in architecture, truth be told…
I bought my home in bad shape (it was a boarding home at one time) and have put over $100,000 into it. Much of the replacement stuff is made of materials that archy-snobs might disparage as inferior and ugly. So must they be the final word?
This city is soooo backwards! Guys who let their properties fall into disrepair are ‘preserving’ the architecture, whilst guys who work to fix up these old houses get nasty letters from the Preservation Board when they use verboten materials. WTF? Do the foolish optimists really expect to ever be able to rehab St. Louis’s housing stock at the rate that it is wearing out on the Northside?
We’d be better off eliminating the HP Board, firing Kate Shay and disenfrachising Callow Dick. With less hastle, maybe the middle class would flock back to the city and restore all the bombed out buildings the archy-snobs cherish!
To improve the appearance of the vinyl, used a number of … that when you look at it, you're looking at architecture!
Vinyl windows are energy efficient. They cut down the cost of bills and save money. I have vinyl windows at my home. And they are really good…
vinyl siding costs
Hello,
I also agree with you. Wood is the wonderful product for home
but now vinyl siding is very popular. In fact i used these siding at my
home and is looking so nice. I have not faced any problem yet with
these. Thanks a lot..