Get Involved in St. Louis — Run for Elective Office!
Now is the time to plan running for elective office in the City of St. Louis. Continuing with my series trying to drum up good candidates for the upcoming elections here is some additional information that you won’t easily find on any website be it the Board of Elections, politically inclined independent newspapers or a local political party. All these sources, no matter how progressive they may purport to be, favor the status quo of over the common person (that would be you and I) not knowing how to run for office.
I’ve had the benefit and pleasure of running for elective office after seeking the Democratic nomination in the March 2005 primary for Alderman in the 25th Ward. After just two short months from filing to election I didn’t do too bad, receiving 44.1% of the vote in a two-way race with an incumbent that outspent me roughly 5 to 1. More time and more money may have tipped the scale. What I didn’t have was the benefit of planning a good 5-6 months in advance, nor did I have this type of information at my fingertips when I started.
I believe our main elected body, the St. Louis Board of Aldermen, is stagnant. They have been in office many years and are not energized to seek new ideas. Challenging them in the political arena will accomplish a couple of things. First, if they are challenged it will make them work for the job. Second it will be an opportunity to bring up issues such as the need for new zoning codes that will promote good urban design and remove some of the politics out of the development process. And finally it is an opportunity to get someone new in office that will bring a fresh perspective and new energy to the position. Tried and true is not getting us where we need to be.
Ok, enough lecturing —- you get the picture. The following is more information including dates to help plan your campaign.
Important Dates for upcoming elections — filing begins in November!
•Wednesday, October 11, 2006 — Deadline to register to vote in November election.
•Tuesday, November 7, 2006 —- Election Day (I will be in Chicago and must vote by absentee for the first time ever).
•Monday, November 27, 2006 — Filing opens at 8am for Spring 2007 elections (even numbered wards, some city-wide offices — I don’t have the full list at this time)
•Friday, January 5, 2007 — Last day to file for Spring 2007 Elections
• Thursday, January 25, 2007 — 40 Day Before Election Report due (for period through 1/20/07), except those running as an independent.
• Monday, February 16, 2007 — Last day to submit signatures to run as an independent candidate for April general election.
• Monday, February 26, 2007 — 8 Day Before Election Report due (for period from 1/21/07 – 2/22/07), except for those running as an independent.
•Tuesday, March 6, 2007 — Municipal Primary election
• Tuesday, April 3, 2007 — Municipal General election
Running as a party candidate (Republican, Green, Democrat…):
•Filing fee is 1% of the annual salary for the job. To run for the Board of Aldermen you’d pay roughly $327 (I think the total taxable income is $32,700/year). This can and should be paid from your campaign treasury.
• You do not need the approval of a party’s central committee to file and seek office.
• Filing starts at 8am on November 27th. Most likely candidates will have had someone waiting in line to hold their place before filing opens. This is so they can assure their name is on the top of the ballot, above any possible challengers.
Running as an independent candidate:
•You must collect signatures equal to 10% of the registered voters in your ward (or 10% of city if running for a city-wide partisan office). So, if your ward had 7,000 registered voters as of April 2005 (the last mayoral election) you’d need 700 valid signatures.
• These would need to be turned in by the 8th Monday prior to the April general election. I believe this would be February 16, 2007 if they counted the dates back the same way I did. Ideally these would be submitted earlier although you can run as an independent after filing has closed for those seeking a party nomination.
•Working the polls on November 7th would be an ideal way to collect the necessary signatures as well as starting to campaign. I will try to put together an editable PDF form that could be used for such purpose. Email me privately if you are interested in running as an independent.
• Independent candidates must file election reports as well, see the Missouri Ethics Commission calendar for dates related to the April 3, 2007 election date.
For the purposes of this post I’m not going to get into city-wide offices such as the President of the Board of Aldermen or the Circuit Clerk. Here are the fourteen seats on the St. Louis Board of Aldermen that are up for re-election (name/party/ward/years served as of election/# terms as of election/campaign fund):
• Fred Heitert; R-12th Ward: 28 years (7 terms); Campaign fund unknown, files “limited activity” reports
• Terry Kennedy, D-18th Ward: 18 years (4.5 terms); $385 as of last specific report (2003).
• Stephen Conway, D-8th Ward: 16+ years (4 terms); Less than $4K
• Stephen Gregali, D-14th Ward: 12 years (3 terms); $12,500 in 2003, limited activity since
• Craig Schmid; D-20th Ward: 12 years (3 terms); $4,7000 in 2003, limited activity since
• Lyda Krewson, D-28th Ward: 9 years (2+ terms); nearly $19K on hand
• Lewis E. Reed, D-6th Ward: 8 years (2 terms); $356 on hand, $5K in debt.
• Dionne Flowers, D-2nd Ward: 8 years (2 terms); Campaign reports due in April & July not yet filed!!!!
• Joseph Vollmer, D-10th Ward: 4 years (1 term); $13K on hand.
• Jeffrey Boyd, D-22nd Ward: 4 years (1 term); $28K on hand.
• Frank Williamson, D-26th Ward: 4 years (1 term); $13K on hand.
• Donna Baringer; D-16th Ward: 4 years (1 term); $14K on hand.
• O.L. Shelton, D-4th Ward; since June 10, 2005; No campaign committee as of July 06!
• William Waterhouse, D-24th Ward: since December 16, 2005; $2,500 on hand
A new round of quarterly reports will be due in the middle of next month so we will see who has kicked into campaign mode and who has not. Many of these have not really had to campaign in years, if at all. Some have a pretty substantial campaign treasury but that should not discourage anyone from running, it will simply make your campaign have to work harder and smarter.
I believe 8 of the 14 have been in office long enough, with at least two terms (8 years). There are people born since Heitert was first elected that are now old enough to run for the office themselves!!! But, as others will certainly indicate, if the voters think they are doing a good job they have the right to re-elect them. My feeling is we as engaged citizens need to step up and run for office and actually give voters a choice. It would be wonderful to see a couple of Democrats, a couple of Republicans, a couple Greens and an independent or so in each of the 14 wards. Of course, that ain’t gonna happen but one can dream.
For additional resources see my post titled How to Run for Local Office.
Excellent.
Heitert has been in office for 8 years longer than I have been alive. Definitely time for him to go. As for many of the rest, probably time for some to go as well. But like you, I would love to see every official chellenged even if I like the job they are doing. I’m really considering a run myself for the future, but I live in an odd numbered ward right now.
I always wondered if there was an age limit. Never did the work to actually check because I was not serious yet. As far as wards go, I have no idea which one I will be in when I turn 25, so I don’t know what election I would be running in. All hypothetical of course.
And I don’t think I will be eligible for 2011. I will turn 25 on April 16, 2011, which would probably be after the election.
A couple of observations and a question – first the question: It takes signatures from 10% of the voters to run as an independent – how many signatures (if any) does it take to run in the party primary?
You alluded to money and financing – in the one race I was involved in, I was told that it was critical to raise money early and quickly, that it helped discourage other candidates as well as giving you the ability to run a better campaign. It might have been – I ended up running unopposed.
You also pointed out the requirement of obtaining valid signatures from 10% of the registered voters – I’ve always heard that you need to turn in 150%-200% of the total required to make sure you have enough vaid ones. So, if you need 750, you better get 1100-1500 . . .
The two things I hated about being a candidiate was asking for money and knocking on doors – probably a fear of rejection on both counts. I don’t know if these hurdles are a good or a bad thing. If you’re motivated enough to work past them, then they probably mean you’re dedicated enough to serve and to serve well . . .
Good luck to everyone thinking about running. Having been on “both sides of the table”, I can say that it’s a lot more fun having the ability to actually change things, instead of just bitching about them. And remember, all politics is truly local!
Excellent post. Great information. Heitert is ripe for the picking. At this point, I am unable to run as I have 3 kids
Somethings wrong with the comment formatting.
I went on to say that if you are interested
in making a run in the 12th, email me.
I would love to help in any capacity.
“But like you, I would love to see every official chellenged [sic] even if I like the job they are doing.”
I generally disagree with this point of view. If you like the job an elected official is doing, why seek or support a challenger? Competition for the sake of competition is a waste of resources.
Admittedly I’m a pretty staunch Democrat, but even some Green and/or Progressive Party issues and candidates have appealed to me. And it’s true, parties are a little less relevant at the local level in terms of decision-making.
Still, local political parties are the building blocks of statewide and national politics.
I want to see more Democrats elected — period. Now, in the primary stage, I would usually support the most progressive candidate possible.
So, sure, I wouldn’t mind seeing a competitive general election in the 12th ward. However, I suspect if a Democrat did win, it would have to be a pretty conservative, Catholic, Sheriff Jim Murphy type. I’d be happy to be proven wrong.
The Greens have a relatively brief, but informative “How To Run” guide online as well at:
http://gp.org/organize/howtorun_mass.pdf
The information is succinct and for the most part applicable to any party.
Steve:
While doing some research on a related topic, I came across the following page that I thought might help your readers considering a run for the BOA:
http://stlouis.missouri.org/government/aldguide.htm