Home » Events/Meetings »Politics/Policy »South City » Currently Reading:

Bill to Blight Jefferson from Gravois to Potomac – UPDATED

October 3, 2006 Events/Meetings, Politics/Policy, South City 7 Comments

Ald. Ortmann introduced Board Bill #153 which will blight a large area of South Jefferson from Gravois to Potomac (see map) putting the area at risk for large scale redevelopment. Ortmann will be holding a public meeting on the issue this Thursday (10/5/2006) at the Five Star Senior Center located at 2832 Arsenal, St. Louis Mo. 63118 form 5:30 – 7:30 pm.

From the ordinance detail (9 pages) we know this much:

An ordinance approving a Redevelopment Plan for the S. Jefferson/Gravois/Potomac Area (“Area”) after finding that the Area is blighted as defined in Section 99.320 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, 2000, as amended, (the “Statute” being Sections 99.300 to 99.715 inclusive), containing a description of the boundaries of said Area in the City of St. Louis (“City”), attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”, finding that redevelopment and rehabilitation of the Area is in the interest of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the people of the City; approving the Plan dated April 4, 2006 for the Area (“Plan”), incorporated herein by attached Exhibit “B”, pursuant to Section 99.430; finding that there is a feasible financial plan for the development of the Area which affords maximum opportunity for development of the Area by
private enterprise

The problem is Exhibit A (area) and Exhibit B (plan) are not found as part of the documentation with the bill on the Board of Aldermen website nor in the City Journal when the bill was introduced. The public, including a resident (block captain) living in the area, are left wondering the full details of the plan. The bill itself is largely boiler plate language so it is these attachments that contain the details. However, at this point the public is not privy to this information. I have left a voice mail with Ald. Ortmann’s secretary requesting said documents.

UPDATE 10/3/06 2:15pm

I received the missing information from Matt Murphy in Jim Shrewsbury’s office (I called him as well). Both exhibits came as one Word document which I have converted to PDF (Note: the weird formatting of some pages appeared in Word when I opened the file). Click here to view the 16-page document which I am hosting on this site since it was not made available through the city’s own website. From the beginning of the plan:

“The S. Jefferson/Gravois/Potomac Redevelopment Area (“Area”) consists of 145 parcels of commercial, residential, split-use and institutional uses as well as vacant lots totaling approximately 18 acres in the Benton Park, Benton Park West and Gravois Park Neighborhoods of the City of St. Louis (“City”). The Area consists of both sides of S. Jefferson Avenue bounded by Gravois Avenue on the north and Potomac Street on the south.”

This document refers to additional items — a land use map and an “acquisition map” which I have requested as well. In my quick review of the plan so far it too looks boiler plate — not much different than the one used on South Grand including prohibiting the use of drive-thru facilities. The plan talks about parking and the screening required but has no real meaningful urban requirements. The plan refers to the existing zoning to rule which, as we know, permits drive-thru facilities. This is an example of where a zoning overlay is needed to improve upon the zoning in the area.

 

Currently there are "7 comments" on this Article:

  1. Douglas Duckworth says:

    Could this be some revolutionary new urbanism redevelopment plan or is it widescale taking of peoples homes for Wal-Greens, Home Depots, strip malls, and McDonald’s.

    We will see.

    I will try to make the meeting on Thursday!

     
  2. Adam says:

    there are already several redevelopment projects in the works along south jefferson (2 across from foodland, 1 at the intersection of jefferson and arsenal, and various housing and business rehabs along the entire stretch) so i don’t understand how the area can be blighted when it’s already in the process of redevelopment. sounds like a scheme to usher in typical strip-mall style crap.

     
  3. Nelly says:

    Probably just a garden variety redevelopment plan, likely not to contain eminent domain language (or possibly citing a few specific addresses of total problem properties to be taken), making way for tax abatement for good projects like Millenium’s new construction effort at Jefferson and Arsenal.

     
  4. Your Virtual Alderman says:

    Or it could be a smart bill to consolidate all previous blighting and redevelopment plans in the area under one new and consistent ordinance.

     
  5. dave devore says:

    Just another tax abatement? Am I the only residential property owner in st louis that has to pay taxes? Developers are making alot of money out there but someone has to pay for the Police and Fire Dept’s. I would be interested to know how many of these 10 year abatements are finally over and how much neighborhoods (say lafeyette square and soulard) are now kicking in and paying taxes.

     
  6. Bob says:

    Question #1: Who actually wrote the bill? Was it written by the Alderman, or by attorneys for the “developers” who handed it to the Alderman? Why are All the Crucial details Missing? Why bring an incomplete program before the public if they don’t have something ( or a lot ) to hide?

    2. Who are the “developers”? Not the name of their company, the name of their LLC, or the name of their attorney. Who are the principles? ( Remember the “Kiel Center Partners”? We Still don’t know the names of the dirt-bag dogs who screwed Kiel Opera House do we? )

    3. What is their track record? What successful developments have they Completed in the past, and what tax concessions, and/or infrastructure improvements did those projects recieve from local governments?

    4.If no tax breaks are now part of this “development”, will the project go back to square one if they come back later and say “sorry, we can’t complete it without further concessions?” If not, why not?

    5. Has there been any competition for this project? Have any other developers been given a chance to put forward any plans? Will they have that chance? If not, why not?

    6. Who is financing this development? One bank, a consortium? Are Any Of Them From St. Louis? Have the financing plans been reviewed? Is the money locked in, or is this another Sunset Hills fiasco waiting to happen?

    7. How much of their own money are the principles putting into the project up-front? ( If it’s a “private matter”, then we should suspect the worst. More than likely, once they get the power, they can go peddle shares in their project to others and make their profit without Any risk to themselves. )

    8. What studies have been done, or will be done, to determine the viability of the development? With all the empty lofts downtown, and all the new condos coming on the market, plus Ballpark Village, where are all the new, affluent, residents, and customers for new stores going to come from? ( Lets face it, much of the surrounding area is piss-poor and crime-riddled. How many Sec.-8 residents will buy $5.00 Lattes at a new Starbucks? ) Have these guys been buying up surrounding properties through front groups in anticipation of this project?

    9. What penalties will the develpers pay if they screw up? Will the property revert to the City? To the previous owners?

    10. Will current property owners have the opportunity to participate in the project as partners, or will they be forced to sell out?

    11. Who will set the standards? Will the developers be given quasi-government powers as happened on Laclede’s Landing?
    ( An area that’s been stuck in the doldrums for decades. )

    12. Will the project be dependant on Federal Grants, of one sort or another, to be financialy viable?

     
  7. Bob says:

    On second thought …

    The ordinance speaks of 40,000 sq. ft. stores!

    That means Big Box.

    It allows 10 foot tall monument signs 50 ft wide!

    Absurd.

    The financing will be by selling bonds … who’s going to stand behind them? The folks from Ladue or the City?

    This smells even worse.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe