Home » Politics/Policy » Currently Reading:

Checking In On The Less Popular Ward Races

February 1, 2007 Politics/Policy 5 Comments

With everyone, including myself, looking at the city-wide race between Jim Shrewbury and Lewis Reed, the hotly contested 3-way race in the 6th ward and the potentially interesting 20th ward race, I thought I would turn some attention to the other challenged seats. With their 40-Day before election reports all in we can see how they are doing at least from a financial perspective:

4th Ward:

Incumbent O.L. Shelton doens’t even have a campaign committee set up at all. Challenger Sam Moore has a committee but only raised $200. These two have no choice but to be grass roots.

12th Ward:

Incumbent Fred Heitert, a Republican, is facing fellow Republican Matthew Browning in the March 6th Primary. Heitert, first elected in 1979 (yes, in the age of Disco), has been filing “limited activity” reports for years. Finally we know how much he has coming into the race, a tad over $3,600. In November he lent his campaign $15,000. Browning is getting a slow start having raised only $50 bucks but he too is willing to spend his own money having lent his campaign $5,000. The winner of the Republican primary will face Democrat James Pree on April 3, 2007. Pree has just established his committee so it is hard to judge how he will do against either Heitert or Browning. Just the fact we will have both a primary and general contest makes this an interesting race to watch.

18th Ward:

Incumbent Terry Kennedy raised $4,300 but he only started with $100. He’s spent $3,657 so far. Challenger Bill Haas who, until recently, was also running for the school board, filed a “limited activity report” which means expense & contributions were limited to $500 or less.

22nd Ward:

Incumbent Jeffrey Boyd, who voted with Jim Shrewsbury against the BJC Lease, didn’t raise much cash but he started off with a tidy sum, after expenses he has over $35K on hand. Challenger Jay Ozier raised $700 and has $111 left. Can you say “uphill battle?”

24th Ward:

Incumbent Bill Waterhouse, who won a 2005 special election after challenger Tom Bauer was recalled from the job, has raised over $11K for this election cycle and has just over $12K on-hand. Meanwhile, Tom Bauer has raised only $200 and has lent his campaign $5,150.

26th Ward:

Incumbent Frank Williamson raised only $375 this period but since he started with over $15K he probably didn’t feel the need to push for much more. Challenger H. Lee Willis has raised around $1,300 plus a loan of another $300.

What I find most interesting is the differences from ward to ward. Some incumbents have massive amounts of money, which is part of the reason you don’t see anyone running against them. Other wards seem to be on less than shoe-string budgets.

 

Currently there are "5 comments" on this Article:

  1. stlmark says:

    Why do you say the 12th ward is a less popular race?

    [UrbanReviewSTL — Good question, I say that based on the fact it has not received the media attention that races such as the aldermanic President’s race has and the 3-way race in the 6th.  The 20th race has issues over liquor licenses and such with both candidates actually having events and a scheduled debate. 

    The 12th, by comparison, has been sleepy.   I hope that all changes soon as I think this could be interesting — when was the last time we had a Republican primary?  Will voters in the 12th take Republican ballots to support either Heitert or Browning but then not be able to vote for Shrewbury or Reed.   Furthermore Heitert has been around so long I think many Democrats are simply used to him — he is part of the system.  That is likely why we’ve not seen a Democrat challenge him in years.  The 12th Ward Democrats, headed by Sheriff Jim Murphy, pretty much have to endorse Jim Pree in April general election but I seriously  doubt he will see any help as a result.]

     
  2. Craig says:

    What kind of qualifications does Browning have to serve on the Board of Aldermen? I don’t think the Board needs any more amateurs.

    [UrbanReviewSTL — technically the qualifications are to be a certain age and a resident of St. Louis.  What do you consider to be the qualifications necessary, other than incumbancy?]

     
  3. GMichaud says:

    Actually “professional” politicians have taken St. Louis no where except 50 years of steady decline,(with a few bright spots here and there). I’m not sure how an “amateur” is ever supposed to get experience if that is a reason for rejecting their candidancy.

    Truthfully we need a clean sweep of the political system. If it means amateurs take their place, they could do no worse.

     
  4. Howard says:

    O.L. uses a PAC, ward 4 organization, Treasurer Kiana Shelton. This time four years ago the 40 days out showed his PAC had raised about $4500 and had $3100 on hand. O.L. signed the report.

    In the old days when you had to go to the Election Board or Jeff City to sift through reports, there was actually better reporting on campaign finance. In Missouri, on-line access often appears to merely feed instand gratification and not a more informed public.

    [UrbanReviewSTL — Thank you for bringing up this issue, let’s get into that discussion about a “more informed public.” The “continuing” committees used by the ward organizations are specifically defined as:

    • not formed, controlled or directed by a candidate
    • is of continuing existence and supports various candidates and/or ballot issues
    • must be formed no later than 60 days prior to the election at which it accepts contributions or makes expenditures
    • includes but is not limited to political action committees, business entity, labor organization, professional association, clubs, any individual or group of individuals who accept and use contributions to attempt to influence the action of voters.

    However, it appears Ald. Shelton is using this continuing committee illegally, as a candidate committee. There is a reason we have this distinction — a 4th ward organization which is “controlled” by an alderman is fraudulently giving the impression the organization is open to supporting various candidates or issues. Looks like it may be time to look deeper into these groups and see how many similar cases I can find, in the interest of a more informed public, of course. Thanks for bringing this to my attention — I will be sure to let Ald. Shelton know where the idea came from.]

         
      • Howard says:

        One of the problems with tracking donations and spending is the lack of historical reference by persons doing research. If you do not know about the relationships between the myriad players, do not know who people are, their kinships, business connections, neighborhoods, nonprofit ties, political pasts, their positives and negatives, you get a different picture of public information than someone who has been around for ages.

        [UrbanReviewSTL — Yes, it is hard to know all the long political history in all these areas.  Still, knowing the law and knowing that if I want to know the finances controlled by an incumbent elected official I should only have to look in one place.  I should not be concerned about multiple ward groups posing as independent organization when they are in fact front groups for a candidate.]

         

      Comment on this Article:

      Advertisement



      [custom-facebook-feed]

      Archives

      Categories

      Advertisement


      Subscribe