St. Louis Magazine Drops the Glitterati for Green in January Issue
Well, not really. The glitterati section is still there — you know people must be seen at all the social functions wearing just the right overpriced outfit. Still, the staff at St. Louis Magazine found time to put together an interesting green issue — their first.
The magazine is still on the same paper and most likely using the same inks as it has been, I see no indication of any recycled paper content or earth-friendly inks. An evaluation of the paper stock and printing methods they use would be a good idea! From “E: The Environmental Magazine” in 2001:
When it comes to promoting ecological destruction, toxic pollution and wastefulness on a large scale, it’s hard to beat the magazine industry. According to Coop America, nearly 95 percent of magazines print on paper with no recycled content, condemning 17 million trees to death by the saw each year.
But the trees cut to make paper are only the first environmental victims of magazine publishing. Turning those trees into pulp consumes enormous amounts of energy and water, and the bleaching process creates dioxin, a chemical the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency called “the most potent carcinogen ever tested on laboratory animals”
Environmentalist say this colossal problem could be greatly reduced simply by switching from virgin to recycled paper. Government research agrees. The EPA has reported that substituting one ton of 100 percent recycled paper for virgin paper saves 17 trees, 4,100 kilowatt-hours of electricity, 7,000 gallons of water and produces 60 pounds less air pollution.
The above is why I don’t get the number of magazines I used to. Even if we recycle them when done the trees are still gone and the pollutants are in our environment. I applaud St. Louis Magazine for doing a green issue, but their future issues need to actually be environmentally green. However, all the photos of the people featured in the green section were taken without any artificial flash and thus didn’t use any electricity — certainly worth noting
But, let’s move past magazine production to the content of the January 2008 issue.
Editor Stephen Schekenberg, a prior client of mine, helps introduce the topic for the month:
At present there is an incredible amount of environmental action taking place throughout St. Louis. In this first “green” issue of the magazine, we celebrate the stars of the region’s environmental scene: architects and designers, college kids and politicians, entrepreneurs and citizens. It’s hard to say what’s been more inspiring — learning what these St. Louisans are doing or hearing the attitude they have while doing it. Yes, the world’s environmental concerns are serious and significant. But their tone — and, we hope, ours — is neither gloom-and-doom nor finger-wagging. I’ve been inspired by their positivity, and their hope. I hope you will be, too.
One of the articles is 20 Cool Ways to Help Stop Global Warming. The number one thing? Ride a scooter, of course! The entire list is well worth reading. They didn’t include using a clothesline to hang laundry, I guess it wasn’t cool enough.
They also do a nice photo spread on the EcoUrban modular home in South City. Besides the nice photos, they point out all the various green features of the home which, to the naked eye, are not always apparent.
The main article is the “Green Giants” — those that are “doing the most to sustain our city — and our planet.” I’m not going to give away their entire list — you’ll have to get the magazine to see that. I did want to point out a few. Among the ‘citizens’ are Eric & Mary Brende as “models for slow living.” Eric Brende, some of you may recall, was the author of “Better OFF: Flipping the Switch on Technology†which I reviewed in July 2005. Eric pedals people around town on his rickshaw and Mary makes wonderful soaps she sells at the Soulard Farmers’ Market. I’ve been honored to speak to have been a guest in their home and I stop and talk to Mary when I am at the market or I’ll chat with Eric when I see him out and about (assuming he doesn’t have any customers).
In the ‘advocates’ section we have J.B. Lester, publisher of the popular Healthy Planet monthly in our region. Early on I wrote a monthly column for the Healthy Planet and one of my dearests friends, Lois Brady, was their food & travel editor for many years. Jeff McIntire-Strassburg from greenoptions.com and sustainablog.org is on the list as is the host of KDHX’s Earthworms show, Jean Ponzi. Also on this list is, well, me!
In the ‘entrepreneurs’ section we have Patrick Horine & Jenny Ryan of the Tower Grove Farmers’ Market and, along with Maddie Earnest and Jason McClelland, also of Local Harvest Grocery. Jenny Ryan is a recent graduate of the Urban Planning program I am in at SLU, her final ‘capstone’ for the degree being about local/sustainable food and the Tower Grove Market was used as a case study.
Also in this section is Terry Winkelmann, a co-owner of Home Eco — the cool store on Macklind that sells all the goods a green person needs. From a great selection of books, to hemp jeans, to solar panels and yes, worm bins — they’ve got it or can get it for you.
Numerous architects and builders are mentioned including Marc Lopata from Sage Homebuilders and Jay Swoboda and Nate Forst from EcoUrban.
In the ‘civic forces’ section we have Citizens for Modern Transit led by my friend (and UrbanReviewSTL reader) Thomas Shrout. Nothing better than debating light rail vs. streetcars with Mr. Shrout! Also mentioned is the Gateway Green Alliance for their activism including getting signatures to have the state audit the City of St. Louis. I’ll be on a panel hosted by the Greens on February 6th. The topic will be transportation – mark those calendars.
And finally we have the scholars and educators section. Someone who is both a scholar and educator as well as a personal friend, and the director of the Urban Planning and Real Estate Development program (UPRED) at St. Louis University, is Dr. Sarah Coffin. Dr. Coffin is one of the main reasons I entered the program at SLU. We don’t always agree on things but she is excellent at ensuring all students get a chance to express their views on the wide range of material presented in her classes. An expert in brownfield development, land trusts and a variety of other topics, I’m glad Dr. Coffin is here in St. Louis. And yes, I have her for one of my three courses next Spring but trust me when I say that sucking up doesn’t fly with Dr. Coffin — participation and well researched and presented ideas are required!
Another feature article, by Stefene Russell, is called Luddite’s Delight. This is how “one writer survived a month of treading lightly on the earth.” This is really a great read as Stefene decides to go green for a month and takes her husband on the journey with her. After starting off the article about the environmental credentials of her family, Stefene turns to herself:
And me? I recycle. That’s about it. In my family, I am the eco-blasphemer. The loser. The kid who might as well have become a dope dealer or an Amway distributor. My husband grew up in the suburbs, in a subdivision he describes as “so cookie-cutter, all the houses developed the same crack in the dining-room ceiling.†He spent his summer days watching MacGyver in an air-conditioned house, two-fisting Twinkies and Kool-Aid. He still loves hot dogs, video games, long meandering drives, new things crackling under plastic shrink-wrap, drive-through pizza, heated car seats, long showers, movie popcorn, swimming pools and gadgets of every sort.
One of my favorite lines from the piece:
Even my father, after going on a 45-minute screed about the “political boondoggle of ethanol,†recoils after I inform him I’m going to ride the bus. “That sounds pretty exotic,†he says. “Don’t you have any college students who could do that for you?â€
This tale of Pradas, transit, MacGyver and toilet paper is an excellent read and thankfully an extended version is available online.
If you go out and buy the magazine be sure to offer it to someone else when you are done. If you’d rather not buy a copy, head to your nearest public library to read it in the periodicals section.
Picked this up last night- saw your mention- Congrats!
I was actually interested in reading more about the architects for the “green” house in Benton Park, but couldn’t find a mention- am I blind?
🙂
I’d like to extend congratulations to both ecoUrban and Sage. You’re setting a very positive and encouraging example to those who remain skeptical that this approach can work in a place like St. Louis. Though you’re clearly not out of the woods yet, and won’t be for some time, the press you’ve been receiving has been overwhelmingly positive. I hope to see more joining the effort, and we’re certainly trying. Keep up the great work.
A scooter is #1, above walking or cycling? Coolness over reality too often leads to the “no hope” outcome. Of course there is no mention of using motorized vehicles less, that would upset too many.
– –
In the same StL Mag, Salci says: “There are two kinds of cities in America. New York, Chicago, Boston—their infrastructure was in place long before the auto became dominant.” (that means StL too!) “When suburbanization came, they developed commuter railroads on top of rail systems. The Detroits and St. Louises got rid of their streetcars—and with that came the weakening of the urban core, as it started to depopulate. You have at least two generations here who have not experienced any form of public transportation.”
– –
But what happens to “green-oriented projects” like mass transit when certain institutions have the power to determine the final design? What happens then when these “green projects” need more funding but are designed not to serve the larger community? Where are the walking paths and bike paths/lanes along the Extension and the New 64? “We need to get a clear view of what we need,†Dooley said in regards to replacing Salci.
– –
The featured “green giant” and philanthropist Kay Drey has said this about the Metro Extension: “I think rail transit is too expensive and too inflexible…{the region’s planners have been “making decisions based on helping Washington University and not people dependent on public transportation,†making reference to the numerous MetroLink stops that serve the university, hospital and also lowers the average speed. But the advocates praised this design, conveniently ignoring reality while basking in the coolness of expanded mass transit . As Kay explains “if people don’t have the facts, there is no hope.â€
“The above is why I don’t get the number of magazines I used to. Even if we recycle them when done the trees are still gone and the pollutants are in our environment. I applaud St. Louis Magazine for doing a green issue, but their future issues need to actually be environmentally green. However, all the photos of the people featured in the green section were taken without any artificial flash and thus didn’t use any electricity — certainly worth noting”
Did the article mention the latter note about electricity? Digital cameras certainly don’t operate on wishful thinking! Or, if it was on film, there’s always chemicals used to process it — tripping an electronic flashbulb is the least of your worries in that department.
Your computer is one of those hand-crank numbers with a biodegradable circuit board, and you walked to your unheated work today, where you ate your locally grown hydroponic lunch, right? We all have to start somewhere – some of us just have different starting points. Tesla Motors has an electric car that goes from 0 to 60 in under four seconds. True, spending thousands of dollars for irrational accelleration isn’t going to save the environment, but if you really do dig that sort of thing you really will make a difference by switching to a Vespa. This is really a civics issue (population vs resources). The breadth of our lifestyles needs to be curtailed partially because it’s damaging in and of itself, but partially because there are 6,600,000,000 of us trampling this earth.
Steve,
Thanks for the props, and the suggestions. I asked our art director and production manager about the recycled paper (I was curious, too) and it turns out that apparently the process of making recycling paper can have its own environmental impact, since chemicals are used to strip the ink off, and then slurry often goes through the same chemical process as virgin pulp. Our paper supplier, Stora Enso, does source its wood pulp from managed forests (ie they’re not just out there clear-cutting trees), and they have been ECF (Elemental Chlorine Free) for about 7 seven years. Not that we are perfect! I just wanted to send an FYI on this count, because it does look odd from an outside perspective. We should have included some kind of explanation as to why we decided not to go with recycled paper so to avoid confusion, but there’s the short version of the story.
I was embarrassed that I had not kept up on the arguments regarding recycled paper (and how complex these kinds of decisions can be). Here’s a longer, fairly informative breakdown on the subject from TreeHugger:
http://forums.treehugger.com/viewtopic.php?p=16838&sid=f290785ead68cb9d35f029935db3a248
Anyway, just a note to clear up the confusion … !
Stefene
(STL Mag)
Good job as always, Steve, with the piece on “green” livng, etc. Now, if I can just somehow convince Christ Church Cathedral, (13th and Olive), to put a windmill on top of the bell tower!
Thanks for information, I'll always keep updated here!
I'm so love this blog, already bookmarked it! Thanks.
I’ll post the same information to my blog, thanks for
ideas and great article.
Â