Would Pedestrian Access Have Saved This Starbuck’s?

July 21, 2008 Downtown 12 Comments

As we’ve all heard Starbuck’s is closing some 600 under performing stores nationwide.  A number of those are in our region.  One is still very new.

It was just in October of last year that I posted about a suburban-style strip center being built with an adjacent Starbuck’s drive-thru (see St. Louis’ Leaders Critical of New Urbanism while Supporting Sprawl Development in Old Urbanist Areas).

And it is closing because it is under performing.  I guess that means cars are not lined up in the drive-through lane wasting $4/gal gas.  Good.   7th & Russell is on the edge of Soulard and hardly the right spot for a drive-thru.  It was only after I pointed out the lack of an ADA required access route that the strip center got such a connection to the public sidewalk.

The Starbuck’s, however, opened without providing the federally required access route.  Why should it, they’ve managed to open other locations in the city and county without meeting this ADA requirement (see post with examples).

I doubt that providing a sidewalk from the public sidewalk to their front door would have saved this location from closure but it couldn’t have hurt.  It would also make the site compliant so that the next occupant could easily accept walk-in traffic from the adjacent dense neighborhood.

 

Post-Dispatch Editorial Board Weighs In on the Lid vs Boulevard Debate

July 18, 2008 Downtown 18 Comments

Today’s paper has an editorial giving widespread attention to the idea of abandoning a section of I-70 once the new Mississippi River bridge is complete and remaking Memorial Drive sans the depressed lanes of the highway:

There appears to be widespread acceptance of the concept of the lid among local leaders; less so the concept of the as-yet-unspecified attraction, at least not yet. The National Park Service — the mission of which is the preservation and protection of the national parks, monuments and other entities over which it has stewardship — has reservations about it. And within the local architectural and planning community, there is some concern that the lid itself might not be the best way to solve the problem of access to the Arch grounds.

For the full editorial with links back to this blog, to Rick Bonasch’s blog and to a KWMU commentary by Michael Allen click here. Hopefully this will put an end to the costly “lid” nonsense and we can move forward with fixing major gashes in our city.

 

Two Steps Forward and One Step Back

July 18, 2008 Downtown 2 Comments

Today I upgraded the software that manages this blog and added some new features. Along the way something managed to wipe out the list of categories. Ugh!

Within the last week I added a new feature which gives you the option to share each individual post with friends. At the end of each post you’ll see a “share/save” option. Just mouse over this and you’ll get a list of options such as emailing a link, bookmarking the post, or using sharing services such as Digg & Delicious. Email addresses are not collected by me so no need to worry about that. Of course you are still free to just copy & paste the post URL to send to others. One step forward.

Today I added a feature that I’ve wanted for a long time — a listing of the posts with the most comments for the last week. Over in the right sidebar between the calendar and recent comments is now the posts that have received the most comments in the last seven days. I have the option to change the number of days so I might make it five, ten or even fifteen days. For now I’ll stick with seven days. This feature is great because it quickly lets a reader see the most recently active posts. Another step forward.

I hadn’t upgraded the WordPress software that manages this blog since switching to it in November 2006. The upgrade took far less time than it took to upgrade my iPhone to 2.0! In the process though it managed to wipe out the names for my nearly 60 categories. Restoring that table of names from my backup is beyond my limited abilities so fixing that goes on the list for the programmer that I need to keep on a retainer. Two steps back.

Also on that list for the programmer is to figure out how to get comments to display paragraph breaks.
So enjoy the new features and my apologies for the missing category names.

 

Town & Country Crossing A Marked Improvement Over The Typical Strip Center in Our Region

Last week, after a meeting, I took a drive out West along Clayton Road with the destination being the new Town & Country Crossing shopping center at Clayton & Woods Mill (map).

The municipality of Town & Country is home to many well to do types. Their city, however, is neither town nor country. It is a collection of big homes on streets with pretentious names yet lacking of sidewalks. The closest they get to country is having deer and that is something they’ve been trying to get rid of. A little too country I suppose?

A few years ago Lucent Technologies left a large building and site vacant at the SW corner of Woods Mill and Clayton:

While the existing uninspiring building could have been remodeled for new tenants a developer saw an opportunity for more suburban development. In particular a more upscale development anchored by a Target and Whole Foods.

In the site plan above you get the Target in the bottom left of the development while the Whole Foods is the letter “E” on the right. A large pond/lake is in the upper right near the intersection. A large section of the total site (left) is designated for residential development.

Nothing says upscale like stone and the entry marker has plenty. I actually like the way the signage for the stores is worked into this wall. The above is the Clayton Rd entrance. Note the presence of sidewalks, an unusual sight along Clayton Rd.

Many might think who needs sidewalks because nobody walks out here. The counter argument, of course, is that nobody walks because they have no sidewalks. However, they do have sidewalks in places.

Above is looking North along Woods Mill from the entrance to the residential area to the South of the new Town & Country Crossings. Clearly when this was built some 20 or so years ago they had walking in mind. However the other commercial developments at this intersection are hostile to pedestrians by their design. The center with a Schnuck’s just to the East of this new development is not easily accessible by foot. They claim to be the “friendliest stores in town” but not if you are a pedestrian. OK, enough about them let’s get back to Town & Country Crossing.

Above is the sidewalk coming from Woods Mill. The entrance from Clayton also has a proper sidewalk.

Walking around the lake is also encouraged. The above view is looking East from the Whole Foods outdoor patio. This sidewalk provides another pedestrian access point into the development off of Woods Mill.


So far they’ve done a decent job of connecting various buildings on the site via sidewalks (thus complying with the ADA Access Route requirement). Above is the sidewalk from in front of the Whole Foods turning the corner to the left and eventually connecting to a couple of buildings that will have smaller stores.

Above is looking back the other direction at the entrance to Whole Foods (the only store completed & open on the day I visited). From this vantage point the center looks pretty typical of suburban strip centers.

Out in the middle of the parking area we see another departure from typical centers — an access route dead center. At the other end of the above sidewalk is the main entry to the new target.

Turning around we see that the previous sidewalk connects to a sidewalk that takes you to the strip buildings along the North (Clayton Rd) side if the development. It remains to be seen just how connected the entire site will be once completed.

For example the above is taken from in front of the Whole Foods looking West. Way in the background is a small strip building near the Clayton Rd entrance. At this time I don’t see an obvious route to get from here to there. I’ll have to return in a few months when they are further along, when it is cooler outside, and I can walk farther.

This is not the project I would have placed on this site. I would have done a commercial street lined on both sides by shops. Like the Boulevard off Brentwood near the Galleria although not so cutsie. The lifestyle center I saw last Fall in West Palm Beach (see post) is a good example of the upscale level of urbanism that would have been ideal for this site. Such a plan would require costly structured parking but offered more lease able space in return. It would have given this section of Town & Country a bit of that missing town.

Still as a big box (Target) strip center it is probably the best in the region. I can think of no other on this scale that does such a nice job of bringing the outside pedestrian into the site and then giving then the option to walk internally.

From a March 2007 Post-Dispatch article:

The shopping-center plans drew opposition from some residents who worried that the local streets were not wide enough for the traffic, while others complained that Target seemed a bit lowbrow for the well-to-do community. Residents signed petitions to block the center in its earlier versions, and they sued TNC. The dispute was settled out of court.

Work was done on both Woods Mill and Clayton, widening and adding turn lanes.  Perhaps the resulting project is better as a result of objections from neighbors?  They probably wouldn’t have liked my quasi-urban lifestyle center either.  Hopefully they’ll start adding more sidewalks so that more people can walk to this shopping center.  Hopefully other developers will stop by to see how strip centers should be designed to meet minimum standards of connectivity.

 

Downtown Bookended by Delayed (Dead?) Mega-projects

Acres and acres sit idle on the edges of downtown awaiting promised new development.  On the South edge we have Ballpark Village and just North of America’s Center and the Edward Jones Dome we have the Bottleworks District.  Both have made news over the past few
years, lately for not going anywhere.


Above:  blocks sit vacant awaiting the proposed Bottleworks District
The latter was in the news again this week for a settlement on one of the blocks the city took from its rightful owner:

A St. Louis jury awarded $2.8 million on Friday to the former owner of two acres just north of the Edwards Jones Dome downtown in a fight over eminent domain.

The city’s Land Clearance for Redevelopment Agency condemned the two-acre tract after the owner refused sell it in 2005 for $523,000.

The property, a city block bordered by Sixth, Seventh, Carr and Biddle Streets, was included in the “Bottle District” redevelopment plan for a $226 million entertainment destination including a restaurant, concert venue and bowling alley. It has not yet come through.

Today the entire site remains covered in gravel with much of the intact street grid blocked by Jersey barriers.

The surrounding blocks could have been developed without taking this one block from the owner.  But assembling larger and larger tracts for larger and larger projects is what proponents say must be done to get development.  Judging from the broken sidewalks and vacant blocks of land  think perhaps it is high time we questioned this practice.

Granted creating the ideal urban building on a single narrow parcel surrounded by vacant blocks is going to be an island for a long time.  Development does have to be large enough to build both excitement and a sustainable level of visitors.

An alternative to the single developer mega-project is to create a zoning overlay district that outlines the urban design qualities that future buildings must have.  This allows different property owners to participate in the redevelopment.  It also allows the business owner to build their own structure without being tied up in an increasingly complicated and difficult process of financing the mega-project.

This city was built one building at a time — each fitting into the grid.  I think we need to return to such a scale to finish filling in the gaps in our urban fabric.

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe