Chaifetz Arena Reduces Accesibility at Compton & Laclede
As we make changes to our city I have the expectation that accessibility for the disabled (and able bodied) will improve. When public money is involved in the project and changes are made to public sidewalks this expectation only increases. But adjacent to the entrance of Saint Louis University’s new Chaifetz Arena accessibility has been significantly reduced following the construction. What was an accessible crossing at Laclede & Compton is no longer accessible (map). From the St Louis Post-Dispatch on Aug 4th:
Tipster Arthur Perry recently complained to On Your Side that there are no curb cuts on the northwestern and southwestern corners of Compton and Laclede avenues, near the main entrance to St. Louis University’s new Chaifetz Arena.
The sidewalk there was rebuilt when the arena was under construction. Apparently, no one thought to make it easy for disabled people to cross Compton.
Perry said the oversight seems especially glaring because the sidewalk on the east side of the intersection, adjacent to the Harris-Stowe State University campus, is accessible to the disabled.
Perry, a part-time pharmacist who lives in the Central West End, first noticed the problem in May, when he attended a colleague’s graduation at the arena. Perry said his wife was recovering from surgery, and she was having a tough time walking.
“I thought if I pulled up close enough to the arena, I’d find a safe place to drop her off,” said Perry, 70. “But there isn’t one.”
After Perry helped his wife climb the steep curb, he noticed a woman in a wheelchair who was stuck in the street. Perry said he helped the woman’s relatives pull her chair onto the sidewalk.
The sad reality is that there are probably hundreds of St. Louis street corners lacking curb cuts, and that there are thousands more inaccessible corners in suburban areas where even sidewalks are a rarity. But you’d think the intersection of Compton and Laclede would be different.
The new arena and a nearby bus stop ensure that the sidewalks there are going to get a lot of traffic, and plenty of those Billiken sports fans are bound to walk with a cane, use a wheelchair or push a stroller.
As a disability-rights activist, attorney David Newburger said he’s filed his share of complaints over pedestrian crossings. Now Newburger runs City Hall’s Office on the Disabled, the public watchdog office that, among other things, is supposed to make sure development in the city is accessible. He said curb cuts aren’t legally required near the arena because, technically speaking, there’s no officially designated, painted-on-the-pavement crosswalk at Compton and
Laclede.Clayton Berry, a spokesman for St. Louis University, said there is an area on Compton that is designated for dropping off visitors. “We believe this drop-off area accommodates the needs of our disabled patrons,” Berry said.
Because there is no ramp or curb cut in this drop-off area, university employees will be stationed there during events “so someone is there to personally assist individuals with drop-offs,” Berry said.
WTF? No painted crosswalk so its OK to ignore accessibility? Sorry but the majority of our intersections lack a formally painted crosswalk, that doesn’t relieve the need for accessibility. From the Missouri Statutes:
(8) “Crosswalk”, (a) That part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs, or in the absence of curbs from the edges of the traversable roadway;
(b) Any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface
A crosswalk need not have painted markings to be a crosswalk, an intersection suffices. Laclede & Compton has been an intersection for over a century. Prior to the construction of the arena the intersection was accessible. Now, after construction it is no longer accessible. Someone screwed up! Time to get Biondi out there with a jack hammer to bust out some concrete and correct this mistake.
As for the drop-off area is is nothing more than a no-parking zone on Compton. A proper drop-off/loading zone would have a ramp area permitting a wheelchair easy access. Getting out of a car and into a wheelchair up on the sidewalk can be a real challenge. It is typical to exit a vehicle to get into a chair on the pavement at the same level as the vehicle. But that isn’t an option at Chaifetz.
We must remember to that people use this intersection daily, so its not just for events at the 10,600 seat venue. People going to Harris-Stowe, Sigma and Wachovia may use this intersection to cross Compton. It ludicrous to think nobody would cross at this point because there is no painted crosswalk lines. Its even more ludicrous to expect those that need curb ramps to go all the way up to Olive or down to Market. Again, somebody screwed up and it needs t be corrected. Maybe the Architect’s Errors & Omissions Insurance needs to cover the cost? Certainly the city shouldn’t.
Click here to view all 42 pictures in my Chaifetz Arena set on Flickr.
May be a little premature to judge, but this doesn’t exactly show Mr. Newburger in a very good light. Some advocate.
It would be very interesting to know who dropped the ball on this, the client, the designers and/or the city?! It’s a blatant disregard of the ADA and is totally inexcusable. But fortunately, it IS fixable . . . the question is only how long it will take and how much pressure will need to be exerted!
Since the city is entrusted with enforcing its own laws and that of the federal government, at a bare minimum the city has dropped the ball.
Mr. Newburger has been very outspoken advocate and expert on this issue. If he says that this is not an issue then I believe him.
He is the expert and has credibility on this issue. He has spent his entire life devoted to this…..
This is an issue that needs to be addressed for the 365 days and 265-300 nights a year that there will be nothing happening in Chaifetz.
However I would like make a correction to the original story from the On Your Side piece. I myself graduated at Chaifetz in May and have a mother that is disabled. The University did in fact create a handicapped drop off area on Compton. I don’t know how the gentleman in the article missed it. And no, it was not just a no parking sign but a coned off and STAFFED area where arena employees were greeting visitors and helping with chairs, getting people up on to the curve etc. My parents actually commented on how impressed they were with the effort that the University put out to accommodate the disabled with smiling and friendly helpers.
This doesn’t excuse the design mistakes that led to their being no ramps, or the disregard for non-arena patrons. But I felt that omission of the University’s efforts to mitigate their mistake was troublesome.
“Mr. Newburger has been very outspoken advocate and expert on this issue. If he says that this is not an issue then I believe him.
He is the expert and has credibility on this issue. He has spent his entire life devoted to this…..”
I love this way of thinking: he’s an “expert”, therefore I will believe whatever he says without question. Maybe I’m totally off base here, but I’ve always felt it is our responsibility to QUESTION the “experts” and not just expect that they’ll do the right thing – especially when their decisions directly affect a number of people. Sorry to break this to you, but even the experts will bend the truth to cover their own ass. Should I give you some examples, or can you find some yourself?
Seems like another case of everyone involved dropping the ball; not a malicious attempt at limiting the mobility of those that need ADA requirements, but an oversight. Hopefully publicizing the mistake through channels such as this blog and letters to other local media, and highlighting the need to fix it for those that use these intersections on a daily basis, will get this corrected.
Dole, I disagree. The designers (civil engineers and architects) have a responsibility to a) know the ADAAG requirments, and b) to make the owner aware of them. The owner has the responsibility to make sure they’re implemented, but many, including some that I’ve worked for in the past, simply choose to ignore the requirements because they “don’t see the need”, don’t think they’ll get caught, and even if they do, they’ll just spend the money then to “fix” the problem when they do get caught. And the City, once they adopt building codes, have a responsibility to make sure that all requirements in the code are applied fairly, consistently and completely. Whether this falls into the realm of “malicious” may be debatable, but this was much more than an “oversight” – these rules have been in place for 15+ years, so any professional will have been exposed to them before now (and they’re not rocket science or particulary complex, either)!
In a way it is inaccessible to the walking public also. Development around St. Louis University and in the city pretty while echo this avenue of inaccessibility.
The pedestrian is almost ignored as much any ADA required feature. The car thinkers still run things.
SLU doesn’t understand urban planning 101, or chooses to ignore it.
The fountain at the corner of Lindell and Grand is typical of the mindless urban planning they produce. Perfect for viewing by cars flying by, or sitting at the stop light, the fountain has the appeal of a roadside billboard.
Compared this to traditional fountains in cities around the world. They are surrounded by people and act as urban art and meeting places.
What we have instead is moving car art. And so if SLU cannot manage to serve the interests of a cohesive urban environment. I would also doubt that they could handle the sophisticated needs of ADA movement through the environment.
It’s unfortunate that the story focused on drop-offs at Chaifetz when the real story is the diminished public access. Not everyone in a wheelchair in that are is headed to Chiafetz, and of those who are not all will have the luxury of arriving in a vehicle. SLU will probably end up paying more on PR defending itself on this issue than it would have cost to make curb cuts.
Car culture rules and if you’re not a loyal user, you’ll be ignored.
It also doesn’t help that most Americans, or at the very least those who are responsible for these decisions, just can’t find it in whatever passes for their heart(or brain) to think of the handicapped as anything more than second-class citizens, if that. All good American Christians otherwise, though, I’m sure.
While cycling thru the Harris Stowe campus I came upon the lack of a ramp on the Chaifetz side. You are required to get off your bike and walk it over the curb if you choose to continue riding thru the SLU campus. This is BS!!!!
Well , the view of the passage is totally correct ,your details is really reasonable and you guy give us valuable informative post, I totally agree the standpoint of upstairs. I often surfing on this forum when I m free and I find there are so much good information we can learn in this forum! http://spoon8.net/