Home » Sunday Poll » Currently Reading:

Interracial Marriage Remains an Issue

October 18, 2009 Sunday Poll 3 Comments

Interracial marriage remains an issue for some:

NEW ORLEANS (AP) – A white Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have.

Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

“I’m not a racist. I just don’t believe in mixing the races that way,” Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. “I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else.”

Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple. If they are, he does not marry them, he said.

(Full article from the Associated Press: Interracial couple denied marriage license in La.)

I can’t believe a justice of the peace in 2009 would be so backwards.  Few of us can say for certain we are of a single race, mixing has been going on for centuries.     This issue is the subject of one of two pols this week, see right sidebar to vote.

We all know our president is the child of an interracial couple, he seemed to do alright for himself.  What bothers me is it seems like the interracial marriage issue only comes up when one party is black.  What about an Asian and an American Indian?  Would this justice of the peace object to that union? Probably not, we are hung up on black.  I just thought we were long past the point of a government representative blocking black & white marriages.

– Steve Patterson

 

Currently there are "3 comments" on this Article:

  1. Chuck says:

    What do either of today’s posts have to do with urban planning and design? You should save these for other forums that aren’t targeted to be your professional blog.

    [slp — urban planning is part of public policy as are these issues.]

     
  2. stlzou says:

    I wholeheartedly agree with you on this one Steve. The difference with this and the other post is that interracial marriage involves civil law. Marriage within the preisthood has nothing to do with public opinion or policy.

    [slp — that which involves the courts involves pubic policy. It is, however, best that the policy of the government be one of non-involvement. But that is a policy decision.]

     
  3. chuck says:

    Fair defense. I’ll bow to the man with the degree on this one. 🙂 I still question some of the STL relevance of these posts.

     

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe