Readers Not Positive About Proposed Solutions For Connecting The City To The Arch
Last week readers voted on their thoughts on the winning proposal in the City+Arch+River competition. While the top individual answer shows support (with changes) the overall sentiment is negative:
Q:Â Now that you’ve had a chance to review the MVVA proposal (for City+Arch+River), what do you think?
- With a few changes it will work 41 [29.5%]
- Few elements aren’t bad but otherwise not impressed 39 [28.06%]
- Very disappointed, my least favorite 24 [17.27%]
- Doesn’t matter, very little will get built. 18 [12.95%]
- Very excited, best of the five finalists 7 [5.04%]
- Other answer… 4 [2.88%]
- Don’t like or dislike it 3 [2.16%]
- Unsure/no opinion 3 [2.16%]
The other responses were:
- the arch is decaying, fix that first!
- Will this really make the riverfront more vibrant and connected to the city?
- Disappointed, this is the doable design, not the inspired vision design.
- The only do-able option
Hopefully in five years we will be impressed by the final outcome. Â Here is the MVVA video:
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArNdigN48Kg
– Steve Patterson
This design could best be described as “fixing the most obvious flaws in public space”. Nothing more, possibly less.