Absentee Voting Open, Props on The November 6th Ballot

Absentee voting begins today in Missouri so I thought I’d show you some items on the general election ballot for voters in the City of St. Louis. You can view the sample ballot here.  Interesting questions this year.

ABOVE: The St. Louis Board of Election Commissioners is on the first floor at 300 N. Tucker (@ Olive)

Official Ballot Title

Constitutional Amendment 3

[full text]

[Proposed by the 96th General Assembly (Second Regular Session) SJR 51]

Official Ballot Title:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to change the current nonpartisan selection of supreme court and court of appeals judges to a process that gives the governor increased authority to:

  • appoint a majority of the commission that selects these court nominees; and
  • appoint all lawyers to the commission by removing the requirement that the governor’s appointees be nonlawyers?

There are no estimated costs or savings expected if this proposal is approved by voters.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to change the current nonpartisan selection of supreme court and court of appeals judges to a process that gives the governor increased authority to appoint a majority of the commission that selects these court nominees. This measure also allows the governor to appoint all lawyers to the commission by removing the requirement that the governor’s appointees be nonlawyers.

A “no” vote will not change the current constitutional provisions for the nonpartisan selection of supreme court and court of appeals judges.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

—-

Official Ballot Title

Proposition A

[full text]

[Proposed by Initiative Petition]

Official Ballot Title:

Shall Missouri law be amended to:

  • allow any city not within a county (the City of St. Louis) the option of transferring certain obligations and control of the city’s police force from the board of police commissioners currently appointed by the governor to the city and establishing a municipal police force;
  • establish certain procedures and requirements for governing such a municipal police force including residency, rank, salary, benefits, insurance, and pension; and
  • prohibit retaliation against any employee of such municipal police force who reports conduct believed to be illegal to a superior, government agency, or the press?

State governmental entities estimated savings will eventually be up to $500,000 annually. Local governmental entities estimated annual potential savings of $3.5 million; however, consolidation decisions with an unknown outcome may result in the savings being more or less than estimated.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend Missouri law to allow any city not within a county (the City of St. Louis) the option of establishing a municipal police force by transferring certain obligations and control of the city’s police force from the board of police commissioners currently appointed by the governor to the city. This amendment also establishes certain procedures and requirements for governing such a municipal police force including residency, rank, salary, benefits, insurance, and pension. The amendment further prohibits retaliation against any employee of such municipal police force who reports conduct believed to be illegal to a superior, government agency, or the press.

A “no” vote will not change the current Missouri law regarding St. Louis City’s police force.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

Official Ballot Title

Proposition B

[full text]

[Proposed by Initiative Petition]

Official Ballot Title:

Shall Missouri law be amended to:

  • create the Health and Education Trust Fund with proceeds of a tax of $0.0365 per cigarette and 25% of the manufacturer’s invoice price for roll-your-own tobacco and 15% for other tobacco products;
  • use Fund proceeds to reduce and prevent tobacco use and for elementary, secondary, college, and university public school funding; and
  • increase the amount that certain tobacco product manufacturers must maintain in their escrow accounts, to pay judgments or settlements, before any funds in escrow can be refunded to the tobacco product manufacturer and create bonding requirements for these manufacturers?

Estimated additional revenue to state government is $283 million to $423 million annually with limited estimated implementation costs or savings. The revenue will fund only programs and services allowed by the proposal. The fiscal impact to local governmental entities is unknown. Escrow fund changes may result in an unknown increase in future state revenue.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend Missouri law to create the Health and Education Trust Fund with proceeds from a tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The amount of the tax is $0.0365 per cigarette and 25% of the manufacturer’s invoice price for roll-your-own tobacco and 15% for other tobacco products. The Fund proceeds will be used to reduce and prevent tobacco use and for elementary, secondary, college, and university public school funding. This amendment also increases the amount that certain tobacco product manufacturers must maintain in their escrow accounts, to pay judgments or settlements, before any funds in escrow can be refunded to the tobacco product manufacturer and creates bonding requirements for these manufacturers.

A “no” vote will not change the current Missouri law regarding taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products or the escrow account and bonding requirements for certain tobacco product manufacturers.

If passed, this measure will increase taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products.

Official Ballot Title

Proposition E

[full text]

[Proposed by the 96th General Assembly (Second Regular Session) SB 464]

Official Ballot Title:

Shall Missouri Law be amended to prohibit the Governor or any state agency, from establishing or operating state-based health insurance exchanges unless authorized by a vote of the people or by the legislature?

No direct costs or savings for state and local governmental entities are expected from this proposal. Indirect costs or savings related to enforcement actions, missed federal funding, avoided implementation costs, and other issues are unknown.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend Missouri law to prohibit the Governor or any state agency, from establishing or operating state-based health insurance exchanges unless authorized by a vote of the people or by the legislature.

A “no” vote will not amend Missouri law to prohibit the Governor or any state agency, from establishing or operating state-based health insurance exchanges unless authorized by a vote of the people or by the legislature.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

OFFICIAL BALLOT – SPECIAL ELECTION

PROPOSITION R – CHARTER AMENDMENT

(Board of Aldermen Amendment)

Shall the Charter of the City of St. Louis be amended in accordance with the Board of Aldermen Amendment Ordinance?

This Amendment restructures the Board of Aldermen of the City of St. Louis as a body of fourteen Aldermen representing fourteen wards, provides for a transition schedule to implement the restructuring, and other related matters, all as set forth in the “Board of Aldermen Amendment Ordinance,” a copy of which is available at all polling places. [Board Bill 31 Committee Substitute]

National, state and some local offices are also on the ballot along with retention of some judges. Last day for voter registration in Missouri is October 10th, in Illinois it’s Oct 9th.

— Steve Patterson

 

The New Highlands Development Replaced The Arena Next Door To The Original Highlands

September 24, 2012 Featured, Planning & Design 23 Comments

The Highlands was an amusement park on the current site of the St. Louis Community College Forest Park campus (see Fire Cleared Forest Park Highlands, St. Louis Community College Forest Park Opened 7 Years Later).  Today The Highlands is a real estate development on the site to the west, the longtime location of The Arena.

ABOVE: Postcard of The Arena (1929-1999). Image source: St. Louis Postcards Facebook Group, click image to view.

According to the book “St. Louis Day by Day” by Frances Hurd Stadler, The Arena was dedicated on September 24, 1929 (Wikipedia says 9/23/1929). The former home of the National Dairy Show was razed in 1999 after the Blues hockey team began playing in the Kiel Savvis Scottrade Center.

A business / residential development now occupies the land that the St. Louis Arena called home, including:

Two apartment buildings featuring loft-style units

A Hampton Inn Hotel

1001 Highlands Plaza Drive West, an office building home to—among other business—the St. Louis group of Clear Channel Communications radio stations (KSLZ, KMJM-FM, KBWX, KATZ, KLOU, and KSD). A grass plaza, with an oval grass section surrounded by concrete sidewalks now sits at 1001 Highlands Plaza Drive West at the location where the original Arena stood.

The Krieger’s Sports Grill on the site closed in early 2008 and subsequently reopened as “The Highlander Pub & Grill” in September of the same year. (Wikipedia)

This post is a look at how the site was redeveloped after The Arena was razed. Let’s start with an aerial overview.

ABOVE: Aerial view of the site as redeveloped. Oakland Ave on top, St. Louis Community College to the right, Wise Ave (bottom) and Oakview Pl on the left. Click image to view in Google Maps.

The green center mentioned in the quote and shown above is much smaller than the former Arena, you can compare them at historicaerials.com. The green is smaller but I appreciate the idea and arranging buildings around a central lawn can be powerful. The following photos were taken on the afternoon of Monday July 9, 2012.

ABOVE: A loft building and an office building seen on the west side of the central lawn.
ABOVE: A plaza at the south end is attractive but lacks tables & chairs. A loft building and a medical building on the east side of the central green.

I want to continue on Oakland Ave and work our way back to the center.

ABOVE: While most arrive by car others arrive on foot from adjacent areas or public transit, I arrived by the latter. This view is looking east along Oakland Ave from the western edge of the site.
ABOVE: Further east on the sidewalk looking back west, the first building built on the site doesn’t have an entrance facing Oakland, meaning there’s very little sidewalk activity.
ABOVE: The crosswalk to the other side of the main vehicular entrance is quite long, but well marked.
ABOVE: Upon entering the site you see the traffic circle with landscaped center
ABOVE: Eventually you reach the point where you can see the building entrance that faces south, toward an auto drive and parking.
ABOVE: Looking south along the west edge of the west drive
ABOVE: I’d cross over to the center green at this point but I can’t in my wheelchair because the crosswalk leads to a curb.

Now let’s take a look at the building facing Oakland Ave on the east side of the drive as well as the hotel and restaurant.

ABOVE: On-street parking on Oakland is good since the building has retail spaces but the building design makes it impossible for retail to work — the elevation change and brick wall prevents window shopping. Huge fail.
ABOVE: Steps between the sidewalk and retail spaces is a foot traffic killer. Wheelchair access to this area is from the opposite side of the building — not from the public sidewalk.
ABOVE: Up in front of the retail spaces you see how drab the space actually is, it does offer excellent highway views though.
ABOVE: The south facade is more successful than the north, the retail spaces have entrances on both.
ABOVE: We have to head east from the south side of this building to reach the restaurant and hotel.
ABOVE: Eventually our destination cones into view but the route isn’t clear.
ABOVE: Oh there’s the restaurant. Pedestrian access fair but clearly secondary, can’t imagine many residents of the loft buildings walking over for dinner. The pair above walked to their car.
ABOVE: Out on Oakland Ave sidewalk this auto drive is the only way to reach the restaurant and hotel. Pedestrians must walk in the drive or know the secret route around the other building.

I was on the adjacent campus of St. Louis Community College after I left the Highlands and saw someone walking with lunch from the Jimmy Johns restaurant in the building with the retail spaces. The Highlands isn’t friendly to those who live or work there and it’s unwelcoming to those on the outside.

Additional housing will soon be built on the remaining vacant land  south of the central lawn:

Balke Brown brought in Humphreys & Partners, a prolific design firm based in Dallas, as the Cortona’s architect. The five-story building will have an exterior “reminiscent of an Italian villa,” with earth-tone panels, the developer said.

When completed in early 2014, the Cortona will have nearly 200 one-bedroom apartments and 80 two-bedroom units. A large courtyard will have a 7,000-square-foot clubhouse, a saltwater swimming pool, an outdoor kitchen and a spa, the company said. (stltoday.com)

Given the fact Balke Brown started with a blank 16 acre site adjacent to a college campus I’d say they did a poor job creating interesting public space. Perhaps it’s sufficient enough to please their investors and those Gen Y types that are afraid  to live in authentic neighborhoods.  Living in a generic office park isn’t appealing to me. Here’s a promo video for the lofts which look like suburban apartments.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CP4bc_OUVs

(view on YouTube)

I just don’t get it.

— Steve Patterson

 

Poll: Thoughts On The Not Yet Open O’Fallon Park Recreation Complex

The $21-$22 million dollar O’Fallon Recreation Complex has been finished for a couple of months now but the facility remains closed.  This facility is the north side equal to the facility that opened in Carondelet Park on November 19, 2009:

The City of St. Louis wanted a new community recreation center on the City’s North Side to serve as a youth and elderly outreach facility, encouraging all ages to be engaged in the community. St. Louis City officials determined that there was significant interest in the North St. Louis area to support this new facility. The project is being funded by a one-eighth-cent sales tax approved by city voters in 2008.

The O’Fallon Park Recreation Complex is designed to achieve a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Silver certification for environmental design and sustainability. “This new project shows the City’s commitment to improving the quality of life in North St. Louis,” says St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay. “This building will be an amenity for nearby neighborhoods and will provide a fun, safe place for children, adults and seniors to go after school and on weekends. It will help make the community healthier, and will help make our northside neighborhoods better places to live and work. The positive impact of this investment will be enjoyed by the community for years to come.” (St. Louis)

But the operating agreement between the city and the YMCA have yet to be approved.

Alderman Antonio French says Mayor Francis Slay has cut a bad deal for his residents. French says the contractor hired to run the facility — the YMCA — wants to charge his residents and the city government too much money, yet can’t assure him needy children will get in for next-to-free. (stltoday.com

And the other side:

Jeff Rainford, Slay’s chief of staff, calls the rec center project the mayor’s “baby” and says he’s not sure why French, who was previously happy with the YMCA’s fee schedule and management proposal, is suddenly holding up the bill. The YMCA says they’ll be able to open the center 90 days after the bill is approved.

“Halfway through, he pulled the bill and started criticizing the mayor,” says Rainford. “We want people to be able to use it. It’d be a crying shame to build this palace on the hill and no one can use it.”

Rainsford [sic] says there will be 1,300 guaranteed scholarships given to kids and their families, 650 will be distributed by the Boys & Girls Club of Greater St. Louis, which is supposed to partner with the Y to provide children’s activities. In order to obtain the lower $25 membership, parents will have to show cause for need and bring in a pay stub or W-2 form. (Riverfront Times)

One issue French told me is YMCA formula for calculating a lower fee, the YMCA says their formula is proprietary information. French says that’s fine for other facilities but not one built with tax money and receiving $1.2 million per year operating subsidy.

ABOVE: Empty bike racks in front of the unopened O’Fallon Park Recreation Complex

Right now both sides have dug in their heels:

The YMCA is lined up to operate the rec center. But city aldermen are raising concerns over a $1.2 million subsidy it would need. That’s $500,000 more per year than an estimate done eight years ago.

It’s not clear exactly where the money will come from.

Slay’s office says under a current plan, 1,300 young people would get a $25 dollar- a-year membership for the center.

Alderman Antonio French says he wants commitments in writing. (KMOV)

No shortage of options:

There’s been a lot of back-and-forthing about who would pay what to use the facility and what discounts might be offered to low-income families. Mr. French told us he’d be satisfied if low-income families paid 60 percent of the planned family rate of $55 a month, or $33 a month. If 5,000 low-income families took advantage of a $22-a-month discount, $110,000 a year would be needed.

Here’s a plan: If all the civic groups and corporations who have bemoaned the lack of recreational opportunities in north St. Louis bucked up, 110 grand would be easy.

Mayor Francis Slay’s office thinks Mr. French is playing politics. He is a paid consultant to Aldermanic President Lewis Reed, who might challenge Mr. Slay for his job next year. Opening a new rec center on the north side before the March primary election might benefit the Slay campaign. (stltoday.com editorial)

So what do you think? Take the poll in the right sidebar (mobile users need to switch to full website). Poll results on Wednesday October 3rd along with my thoughts on the controversy and a look at pedestrian access to the facility.

— Steve Patterson

 

Seating For All

September 22, 2012 Accessibility, Downtown, Featured 4 Comments

For many years the establishment Flannery’s Pub at 1324 Washington Ave has had sidewalk seating. Unfortunately, those seats have been tall seats & tables.

ABOVE: High outdoor seating at Flannery’s

When I started this post it was going to be to thank them for adding regular height tables so the rest of us could eat alfresco.

ABOVE: Additional tables just added that are at regular height

But thursday night I passed by and these tables I photographed a few days earlier were gone already. What’s the big deal? With help I can get into a high stool but for many that’s not an option. Restaurants need to offer some regular height seating indoors and out.

— Steve Patterson

 

Culinaria’s Dock & 9th Street Garage Hostile To Pedestrians On Locust

September 21, 2012 Downtown, Featured, Walkability 6 Comments

When Desco built the 9th Street garage to support their renovation of the Old Post Office they didn’t design is for a grocery store, even though Desco is Schnuck Markets development arm. If you’ve shopped at Culinaria you’re well aware of the shortcomings inside.  If you’ve walked there you’re likely aware of them from the exterior too.

ABOVE: A man leaving Culinaria pushing a stroller is forced to walk in Locust to get around semi truck unloading at the store as a vehicle exits the parking garage (left of semi). September 2012

This time I saw the truck on my way to Culinaria so I stayed on the north side of Locust. Other times I was blocked, I even had to wait once while a truck backed in.

ABOVE: Delivery truck backing into Culinaria’s loading dock, August 2011
ABOVE: Truck is back as far as it’ll go, August 2011

That’s the loading dock, before then is the vehicle exit from the parking garage.

ABOVE: A pedestrian walks in front of the exit to the parking garage. The sign reads: CAUTION: EXITING VEHICLES
ABOVE: A car just starting to exit the parking garage moments later.

Pedestrians are told through falling signs to use caution because of exiting vehicles. Some garages have an audible sound to alert pedestrians when the gate goes up to allow a vehicle to leave. Not here. Well, I’m sure motorists are cautioned to look for pedestrians.

ABOVE: There are no warnings to motorists exiting the parking garage to be on the lookout for pedestrians

Nope! Nothing on the ramp to remind drivers to look out for and to yield to pedestrians.  If an audible sound were to go off when the gate goes up that would also help alert drivers to pedestrians crossing their exit route.

Warn the pedestrians about cars but not warn the drivers about pedestrians. Figures.

— Steve Patterson

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe