Home » Featured »Planning & Design »Transportation » Currently Reading:

Jefferson Ave Is Still Too Wide

October 15, 2013 Featured, Planning & Design, Transportation 11 Comments

Jefferson Ave has been a major 6-lane roadway for decades, but with substantially fewer residents and interstate highways, it has been excessively wide. Recent work along Jefferson between Chouteau and Market have reduced the number of travel lanes to four, with plus bike lanes added to the mix.  Unfortunately, the road is still too wide.

The new-ish viaduct over the railroad tracks doesn't have unused roadway. Yes, there's a bus stop here sand it gets used.
The new-ish viaduct over the railroad tracks has four wide high-speed lanes. Yes, the bus stop here gets used. Note the faded markings in the bike lane.
Excessive road width, as wide as the sidewalk, is just painted
Left over road width, as wide as the sidewalk, is just painted
At the new bridge over I-64 the unused roadway width is wider than the sidewalk
At the new bridge over I-64 the unused roadway width is wider than the sidewalk!

This was the perfect opportunity to place the curb in a position to give excess width to the sidewalk, giving room for street trees to separate pedestrians from passing cars.

See my earlier post: Jefferson Avenue Needs A Road Diet, Corridor Study

— Steve Patterson

 

 

Currently there are "11 comments" on this Article:

  1. abernajb says:

    While not completely the right way to do it, leaving that area striped as it is is helpful for buses. One needs only look at Grand (SLU Med School), where the buses on the new diet section stop half in the bike lane, half in the driving lane, causing all sorts of problems on the ‘reduced’ lane area. Most of the time, one lane can do, but during rush, two lanes really are needed on some of these arteries for any amount of good flow. And with ‘half a lane’ being taken its a bit dangerous at times as people squeeze by. While building a true diet, with bus pull outs, is better, this striped lane allows flexibility during breakdowns, bus stops, even construction down the road.

     
  2. Jefferson is extra wide near the bridge for a reason. If MoDOT and the city ever get around to building the 22nd St interchange, a new left turn lane will be added for southbound to eastbound traffic, thus filling in the painted space.

     
    • Huh? You mean if they make on/off ramps to the east of Jefferson? Wouldn’t a single point interchange work better here?

       
      • MoDOT, I’m sure, would prefer full highway access to/from both Jefferson and 22nd St. Since the two streets are too close together, they would be linked with outer roads much like the Brentwood/Hanley interchange.

         
        • I don’t see a route for a 22nd street parkway north of Olive — too many rehabbed/occupied buildings. MoDOT should abandon the 22nd street interchange completely, adding in/off ramps to the east of Jefferson.

           

Comment on this Article:

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe