Readers Sometimes Come To A Full Stop

The poll last week was about the St. Louis rolling stop:

Q: When coming to a stop sign or red light I:

1. sometimes do a full stop, other times I don’t, just depends 72 [41.14%]
   
2. come to a full & complete stop at every stop sign/red light 62 [35.43%]
   
3. only do a complete stop if I see a cop or a camera. 18 [10.29%]
   
4. Stop means roll, right? 10 [5.71%]
   
5. I don’t drive a car 9 [5.14%]
   
6. Other answer… 4 [2.29%]

I’d like to think I always come to a full stop, but i know I don’t always.  Here are the four other answers:

1. Cant compare the two.
2. treat as yield, use discretion, be responsible
3. stop signs and red lights are totlly different. This poll is dumb
4. I do a rolling stop if 3 black punks are on the corner waiting to rob me if i st

Hmm, “stop signs and red lights are totlly [sic] different. This poll is dumb”  Are they totally different? From the Missouri Driver Guide:

Both require a full/complete stop. The rules about proceeding after coming to a stop are different, but otherwise they are very similar.

– Steve Patterson

South Grand Will Be Much Improved

Work on the new streetscape for South Grand has started.  The new design will address shortcomings of the current streetscape.  Very little of the new work is complete but what I’ve seen so far looks great.  Can’t wait to visit in my wheelchair, once finished, to do a full review.

– Steve Patterson

The City Is Better Today Than In 1990

I was just 23 when I moved to St. Louis in August 1990.  At that point the 1990 Census had been completed, but the numbers weren’t yet revealed.  Thus, the last population number for St. Louis at the time I moved here was 452,801 (1980).  I was moving from a city with fewer people to a bigger city, Oklahoma City had 404,014 residents in 1980.  Oklahoma City also has ten times the land area of St. Louis so the urban density was and  is far far less.  But I didn’t live here during the decade of 450k+ residents.

As I was moving from the Central West End to Old North St. Louis (then known as Murphy-Blair) in March 1991 the new population figure was released: 396,685, a loss of 56,116.  That seemed like nothing compared to the loss of 169,435 between 1970-1980. We had just dipped below 400,000, the first time we’d fallen to levels not seen since the 19th century.

In 2001 the 2000 Census showed another loss, this time 48,496 fewer residents.  Each time the Census figures came out I considered bailing, jumping off the sinking ship.  This time is different, leaving is the last thing on my mind.  More than ever I want to stay and fight so the 2020 Census shows a gain rather than a loss.

The growth of St. Louis slowed in the 1920s and the the city lost a little population in the 30s.  The shift to newer housing was well under way when the post-WWII boom coupled caused housing shortages and gave St. Louis the false impression the 1940 drop was a fluke.

Harland Bartholomew’s destructive vision to remake the city. From the 1947 plan:

The City of St. Louis can anticipate a population of 900,000 persons by 1970, based on these assumptions:

1. That the population of the St. Louis Metropolitan District continues to maintain its present proportion to total urban population of the United States.
2. That an attractive environment for living will be developed throughout the city to counteract current decentralization trends.
3. That the city is, nevertheless, a maturing urban center that can never expect to attain the tremendous past growth of certain earlier periods.

The #2 item above meant urban renewal.  Erasing the old walkable city and building back an auto-friendly city. Tens of thousands were forced from their homes for highway construction and housing projects like Pruitt-Igoe.

Today our loses are for different reasons: an ingrained anti-city bias and a dysfunctional public school system. I think we can fix these issues.

The 2020 Census may show another loss which is fine if the city continues to get better as it has these last 20 years.

– Steve Patterson

Poll: Reaction to the 2010 Census showing a loss of 29k residents?

The realization that St. Louis continued to lose population between 2000-2010 is on everyone’s mind.  What better topic for a weekly poll?  The poll is in the upper right corner of the site.

Here is some info you may or may not have seen:

Only four of the 28 wards showed an increase in residents: 5,6,7, 19.

How did these four wards, all grouped in the center, manage to increase population?  Could be this is where the Slay administration focused their attention?  Maybe the core offers the most urban lifestyle?  Or both?

If we look at population changes on a neighborhood basis (3-page PDF) we see the numbers are all over the place. Downtown had a 359% increase, going from 806 to 3701.  Downtown West, where I live, only had a 79% increase, going from 2,204 to 3,940 residents. Yes, Downtown West (West of 14th St?) has more residents than Downtown proper.  McRee Town, on the other hand, had a 43% decline.

I’ll have my thoughts tomorrow.  In the meantime the poll is in the upper right.

– Steve Patterson

A Month Without Transit

Last summer I decided to begin using transit for the bulk of my transportation needs.  I was doing well July 2010 through January 2011.

But then the snow & ice came in February.  It must have started in late January because I couldn’t get out to even buy a February pass.   Sure, I could have ordered it online but I decided I’d wait and see what happened.  We had that one nice week but I didn’t have a pass.  I could have bo0ught individual tickets but I find myself more willing to use transit when I can just swipe the pass rather than pull out money and not lose a transfer.

I went to the sales office at the SE corner of the convention center yesterday and bought a pass for March.  It feels better having the pass in my wallet, especially with rising gas prices. Now is the time to give transit a try, don’t wait until July when gas prices may exceed highs from July 2008.

– Steve Patterson