I See Vibrant Urban Streets

Three years ago I did a post, Envisioning Smart Growth, that I want to make you aware of.   In that post I featured some impressive photoshop work done by a California firm, Urban Advantage:

Before
After
After

My original post has two intermediate steps between the before and after.  The firm’s website has many more examples of using photoshop to create visuals to show how streets can be improved through narrowing streets, widening sidewalks, building up to the street and so on.

I often like to visit their site to see the latest projects they have done, helping their clients all over the country to visually show how proposed changes would help streets and places mature into a more urban/walkable form.  Of the many posts I’ve done over the last five years this simple post was one of my favorites.  I have thoughts of transformations like this going through my head for every corridor in the region.

My hope is we, as a city & region, will begin to think beyond what we have today and work toward what we can have tomorrow.  This requires coming together to create a collaborative vision and implementing the zoning to ensure that future efforts build toward the vision.  I invite you to look through the many examples on their site.  The photoshop work is the easy part, I also know that streets won’t transform themselves without a strong vision.

– Steve Patterson

 

What is wrong with this sidewalk?

October 27, 2009 Accessibility, Downtown 5 Comments

This sidewalk, heading South from Washington Ave. along the East side of 14th Street, has a number of issues.  Most notably it is too narrow.

On the positive side, the trees and parked cars make a nice buffer between the pedestrian and passing vehicles.  Since my stroke I’ve walked this sidewalk a few times and the half block you see here is harder to walk on than the previous two blocks to get to this point.  It slopes downhill slightly but that is not an issue.  The cross slope, however, makes this sidewalk very difficult to walk on.  The side to side slope is beyond allowable limits of the ADA.  To the eye you can see the slight slope.

The able-bodied would have no problem walking this sidewalk but for those of us with one leg that doesn’t work as well as the other find it a major challenge.

– Steve Patterson

 

Poll results from last week

October 26, 2009 Sunday Poll 10 Comments

Last week I had two polls, here are the results:

1) A Louisiana justice of the peace refused to marry an interracial couple citing concern for any kids they may have. Thoughts?

  • This is not 1959! He should resign. 154 (72%)
  • A legit concern even in 2009, he should keep his job. 53 (25%)
  • Unsure/no opinion 8 (4%)

A state statute says justices of the peace may perform marriage ceremonies, but it does not require such officials to do so, Tammi Arender, a spokeswoman for the Louisiana attorney general, told CNN on Monday.

Justices of the peace in Louisiana are elected, but the state’s high court has jurisdiction over whether they can keep their jobs, Louisiana Supreme Court spokeswoman Valerie Willard said. The Judiciary Commission, a judicial body independent of the Supreme Court, has the power to review a case and make recommendations to the high court. (Source: CNN)

2) Should Catholic Priests be allowed to marry:

  • Yes 103 (73%)
  • No 25 (18%)
  • Unsure/no opinion 13 (9%)

Both interesting results, neither was what I expected.

– Steve Patterson

 

Riding the #99 Downtown Circulator Bus

October 26, 2009 Downtown, Public Transit 13 Comments

Last week I rode the fairly new #99 Downtown Circulator bus with Metro employee Courtney Sloger.  I had met Ms. Sloger a few weeks earlier as part of a panel with Dr. Todd Swanstrom of the University of Missouri St. Louis discussing transit for What’s Up Magazine.  Sloger doesn’t own a car and uses transit herself.  She is one of a couple of writers on Metro’s NextStop STL blog.

It was at this panel discussion I first heard of the #99 bus.  I was so excited I wrote a post about it last month that included the route map:

When I agreed to ride the #99 with her I planned to use the opportunity to use my wheelchair to try the lift for entry/exit.  The battery on my chair decided otherwise.  With the chair no longer taking a charge I would need to drive my car to a point along the route.  To simplify meeting Sloger I picked her up at Metro’s offices in Laclede’s Landing.  I drove to 10th & Washington Ave where there was plenty of on-street parking on 10th.  The time was around 4:30pm a week ago today. The bus stop was just around the corner on Washington Ave.

One of the amazing things about this route is the frequency of the buses, only 10 minutes.  So we caught the next Westbound bus.  I rode a bus in Seattle in March so I knew I could walk up the steps without issue.  The buses being used are shorter than most in their fleet.  This makes navigating downtown streets easier.  Many seats still remained empty.

We headed West on Washington and turned left onto Tucker.  Nobody got on or off along Tucker.  At Spruce we turned right to head to the Civic Center Station with many bus routes, MetroLink, Greyhound and Amtrak.  The #99 doesn’t board/unboard inside the bus section but along 14th street adjacent to the bus terminal.  If you are passing through this point on the #99 be sure to get a transfer ticket when you board.

Resuming the ride when went in the direction we had just come from except now we were going East on Washington Ave.  We turned right (South) on Broadway.  We took Broadway South past Busch Stadium until we turned left at Poplar and left again on 4th.  I didn’t set my timer but the entire round trip was much faster than I expected.

Along the way we talked about destinations nearby and how to market the route beyond the current ridership, mostly blue-collar transit dependent riders from my observation.  I suggested the buses need a special look.  While I preferred new low-floor buses Courtney Sloger thought a wrap works into the budget better.  Agreed, just something to make the bus stand out from the others.

Many cities have transit lines to help you navigate from destination to destination.  But just who are those more likely to take a ride on the #99?

Downtown residents and office workers seems an obvious answer.  Tourists and visitors here for conventions?  The wrap should include the words “downtown circulator” in big letters, I suggested.  And a graphic of the route.  Listing destinations reachable via the bus would help too.

When I visit a city I like to ride a bus or streetcar line to observe what is out there so I’ll know what to come back to on foot.  But the current #99 misses one of the best parts of downtown, the two blocks of Washington Ave between Tucker and 14th. Visitors should see this.  Granted if they exited at Tucker when the bus turn they’d be right there but I think going through it is better.  I’d like to see the route modified to go up & down 14th rather than Tucker (12th). The problem is 14th is often closed at Chestnut for special events at Soldier’s Memorial.  I guess on those days the bus could take Tucker.

For tourists they’d still need to know where they are going because destinations are not announced. Many places are close, but not obvious, such as Citygarden, Union Station, City Museum, and Culinaria.  Someone might get into town late on a Saturday.  After checking into their hotel on 4th they could take the #99 to grab a bite at a number of places such as the 12th Street Diner at Tucker & Washington Ave. While the diner is open 24 hours on the weekend, the bus line stops around midnight.  Check the schedule for hours & directions.

I suggested Metro get hotel concierges to ride the route at least once.  Downtown guides too.

As a helpful tool for downtown residents I suppose it depends upon where you live.  If you are in the Edison Warehouse at 14th & Spruce it is am easy way to get you closer to stores like Macy’s, Culinaria and others.  The steps into the bus, however, make bringing on purchases a challenge.  For those of us West of 16th the line doesn’t help much.  For people in the Pointe 400 apartments (old Pet building) on 4th Street it would be an excellent way to connect with restaurants and other destinations  that are a good walk from your place.

I invite each of you when you are downtown next to ride the #99.  See what you think.  I like the possibilities it offers for the future.  Certainly needs a special look.  Most definitely needs low-floor vehicles to eliminate the steps.But it is a step in the right direction.  Thanks Courtney Sloger for pushing me to ride the #99.

– Steve Patterson

 

The number of wards

In looking back over the many posts I’ve done over the nearly five years I’ve been publishing this blog one of my favorite topics is local politics.  Reforming the city’s charter is always a good discussion.

In 1950 the City of St. Louis had 28 ward-elected Aldermen representing 850,000 residents (30,350/Alderman) covering 61.9 square miles.  By 1970 the population was down to 622,000 but we still had 28 aldermen.  By 1990 the population was below 400,000 yet the number of elected Aldermen & wards remained unchanged since the city had more than double the population. Today each Alderman micromanages a fiefdom of less than 13,000 subjects.

In January of this year I presented the following chart created with the assistance of a friend:

The current level of Aldermen causes each to focus on their ward only.  Constituent service becomes their top priority: stop signs and other items better suited to a bureaucrat.  Because our elected  aldermen focus mainly on issues within their ward, the bigger city-wide issues often lack leadership.  Many corridors cannot be planned because different aldermen control opposite sides of the street.

I don’t believe our city will prosper again until we make a number of structural changes, including reducing the number of ward-based aldermen.  I tend to believe we need both ward-based and city-wide representation.  I’d like to start from scratch.  At the very least change all the names — City Council instead of Board of Aldermen, Districts rather than Wards. Shake City Hall from top to bottom.

The poll this week deals with one aspect of charter reform, the number of representatives for our city.  The number of representatives cannot possibility be right in 1950 and in 2009 with half a million fewer residents.  Did they have too few in 1950?  No, we have too many today. Would this mean less Black elected official?  Yes.  Less White officials too.  I think the proportions would remain unchanged.

Vote in the poll in the right sidebar and discuss your views below.

– Steve Patterson

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe