Subscribe to Urban Review St. Louis

December 7, 2004 Featured 5 Comments

If you’ve been on the edge of your seat wondering when I’m going to post my next critique of St. Louis then all you’ve got to do is subscribe. When you subscribe I will send you a short email with a link to the latest entry as soon as it is posted. Your email will not be sold or used for any other purpose.

If you wish to subscribe to receive these notices simply put “Subscribe” in the subject line. Use the link below:

Send email

Thanks for your continued interest and support!

– Steve

 

Gravois Plaza Less Pedestrian-Friendly than previous center

December 7, 2004 Featured 11 Comments

Gravois Plaza was completely rebuilt from the ground up in the last few years. The old shopping center dated to probably the 1960s and had an interesting courtyard space between a K-Mart and smaller stores. I can’t say it worked well – but it was different than most strip malls.

Basically, K-Mart got the boot in favor of a new Shop-N-Save grocery store. On the whole, the new Gravois Plaza is more attractive than the old. However, what we need to remember is almost anything new is apt to be better looking than something which is dated and poorly maintained. It is this newness that often masks underlying design flaws. Unfortunately, the new Gravois Plaza makes a number of big mistakes for an urban shopping area. First, check out the map link below to see the street pattern:


[ Yahoo! Maps ]

Map of
3861 Gravois Ave
St Louis, MO 63116-4657

Below is a photo looking East on Oleatha at Gravois Plaza – nothing but wall. The entire Western border of Gravois Plaza along Gustine remained unaltered from the old plaza – keeping the unfriendly wall.

gp_01.jpg

Most of the housing around Gravois Plaza is to the West & North of the development. However, entrances from the West & North are not provided except at the extreme corners to the South & East. But, this is one of the better urban neighborhoods so people do walk to the store. Unfortunately, Gravois Plaza was not designed to be accessed by foot.

gp_02.jpg

Walking along Gustine street along the west (above) the pedestrian is trapped between an overbearing wall and passing cars. Note, the sidewalk is right next to the street and you don’t have any parked cars or street trees to give you any feeling of protection.

gp_03.jpg

Above is the Southwest entrance to Gravois Plaza, looking out across Gustine and down Tholozan. If you look closely you see the sidewalk continues along Gustine but doesn’t enter Gravois Plaza. The grass is worn where pedestrians have cut through to create the shortest walk. Let’s turn around and head toward the grocery store.

gp_04.jpg

Above is what the pedestrian is faced with. You cross a large service drive for delivery trucks (where I am standing to take the picture) and ahead is a drive for CiCi’s Pizza. No sidewalk is provided so pedestrians must walk in the path of cars. Real inviting huh?

gp_05.jpg

The view above is continuing into Gravois Plaza as seen from the drive to the CiCi’s Pizza. You can see in this view a pedestrian walking toward the store along the driveway.

gp_06.jpg

Rounding the curve the Shop-N-Save comes into view. Here the pedestrian is forced to walk in the driveway again. But look close, the wrought iron fence designed to keep someone from falling down the change of level forces the pedestrian in the drive – they have no where to escape in case a car comes to close. Clearly, no thought was given to pedestrian access.

gp_07.jpg

The photo above was taken at the same position as the prior picture. This view is looking West & South where we just came from. As you can see by the worn grass, pedestrians have been walking on the tiny strip of grass between the drive and retaining wall. In the background you can see a pedestrian leaving Gravois Plaza with two full bags of groceries – forced to walk in the drive and unable to see cars approaching from behind.

gp_08.jpg

The view above is looking South from the Shop-N-Save with a US Bank branch in the background. Again, you can see how the fence keeps pedestrians in the driveway. Please note, the Bank and daycare center along Gravois were not part of the redevelopment – these remained unchanged.

I’m in this area 2-3 times per week and I have always seen pedestrians taking this unfriendly route. I guess one could take the attitude that people are walking anyway so what is the big deal. However, the message to people is clear – if you don’t have a car we really don’t give a shit about you. Sure, we don’t mind if you walk here to spend your money but don’t expect us to go out of our way to do anything for you.

In the meantime the parking lot is way too big and has so few trees it is almost comical. How is it TIF financing can be used to finance a project that is closed to the neighborhood to the West & North, is anti-pedestrian and is mostly paving? Our city must not have any codes requiring a connection to the neighborhood, pedestrian access and even something so basic as a reasonable level of landscaping.

The old Gravois Plaza, for all its faults, was more accessible to neighbors to the North. People could enter at Potomac & Gustine and enter the courtyard space. So while the new Gravois Plaza is cleaner and features a nice Shop-N-Save store it is less pedestrian-friendly than the old Gravois Plaza.

So what would I have done you ask? Well, I would have destroyed the wall along Gustine and connected the development to the neighborhood by regrading the site. To achieve a true connection to the surrounding neighborhoods I would have divided the site back into separate blocks divided by public streets. Hydraulic Street, the South entrance along Gravois, would be cut through all the way North to Potomac Street. Oleatha & Miami streets would be cut though between Gustine on the West to Bamberger on the East. This, of course, is completely counter to conventional thinking about shopping areas.

With all these new streets plenty of on-street parking could have been provided. Several small parking lots could be provided as necessary. Arguably, less total parking could have been provided as you’d have more people willing to walk from the adjacent neighborhoods. Ideally, some new housing would have been provided above some of the retail stores. Big Box stores like the Shop-N-Save have been integrated into more urban shopping areas in other cities – it takes a willingness on the part of the city to show developers & retailers the way. The smaller stores would easily fit within a new street-grid development.

A substantial amount of money was spend rebuilding Gravois Plaza but the area is not really a part of the city. It is a suburban shopping center imposed upon the city. This could have been so much more.

– Steve

 

St. Louis needs greater density

December 6, 2004 Featured 4 Comments

“Dense concentrations of people are one of the of the necessary conditions for flourishing city diversity.”

The above quote is from Jane Jacobs’ classic, ‘The Death and Life of Great American Cities.’ In chapter 11, ‘The need for concentration,’ Jacobs continues:

“One reason why low city densities conventionally have a good name, unjustified by the facts, and why high city densities have a bad name, equally unjustified, is that high densities of dwellings and and overcrowding of dwellings are often confused. High densities mean large numbers of dwellings per acre of land. Overcrowding means too many people in a dwelling for the number of rooms it contains.”

I think all too often in St. Louis this confusion abounds. The trend to convert two-family buildings to a single family structure is in part because of the false notion that we need to reduce densities. I hear it all the time. What do we accomplish by reducing the total number of dwellings in this fashion? We make it harder to create a vibrant & diverse city. While I don’t have any facts & figures in front of me I’d say we are probably only breaking even as far as dwellings are concerned. For every new house or loft constructed we are reducing a four-unit building to two or a two to a single. Downtown is gaining units while the other neighborhoods are losing needed density. This is not a good thing!

Back to Jane Jacobs, “In districts where densities are too low, they can be raised and variation increased by adding new buildings simultaneously in different, separated spots only. In short, densities should be raised – and new buildings introduced for this purpose – gradually rather than in some sudden, cataclysmic upheaval to be followed by nothing more for decades. “

Jacobs is not advocating wholesale destruction of neighborhoods to create high density housing – she is suggesting over time cities need to increase densities to a level to support a diverse & vibrant city life. The ideal place for increased density is near MetroLink stops – both current and future. Most city neighborhoods are low density and need more dwellings and people – not fewer.

Jacobs’ book will be discussed Sunday 12/12 at 1pm. The location is Grbic at 4071 Keokuk (@ Meramec).

– Steve

 

Candidates for St. Louis’ Primary Election

December 6, 2004 Featured 3 Comments

Interested in who is running for Alderman in your ward as well as for Mayor and Comptroller? If so, you can keep an eye on the St. Louis Board of Elections website:

Click here for filings for the 3/8/2004 primary.

Not many challengers out there so far. Come on folks – are you going to let the incumbents just breeze through another election and be in office another four years?

In my Ward, the 25th, Carl Coats is challenging Dorothy Kirner. Challengers have also filed in the 5th & 23rd wards.

If anyone needs to be challenged this election is 7th Ward Alderwomen Phyllis Young. She posed no objection to the demolition of the Century Building for a parking garage. Phyllis – it is time for you to retire from elected office. Withdraw and let someone else run.

– Steve

 

St. Louis’ Public Meetings list offers some help staying informed

December 5, 2004 Featured 1 Comment

Since I’m critical of the management of the City of St. Louis in much of my writing I thought it would be wise to get more involved – to learn more about the process and be better informed. Well, just learning how to get better informed has been a process in and of itself.

I started with a pretty handy link on the City’s website appropriately titled Public Meetings. This dynamic list shows you public meetings to be held in the upcoming 31 days. As of today eleven meetings are scheduled with the first being the Affordable Housing Commission on December 7th.

Affordable Housing sounded interesting so I clicked on the link and I get information on the time & location of the meeting. But, I don’t get a link to their web site, an agenda or anything. So I go to the St. Louis City web site and search for Affordable Housing Commission and get their website. But, it doesn’t really tell me anything. I do get a list of Commissioners & staff, their mission and prior development awardees. I have no clue if this commission meets monthly and what the upcoming agenda will be. If they do meet monthly – say on the first Tuesday of each month – the next meeting would be on January 4th which is within the next 31 days. So, perhaps they don’t meet each month? Or they do but don’t want to meet that close to the new year? I move on…

Next on the list is the Planning Commission scheduled for December 8th. Clicking the link I get the time & location of the meeting as well as a detailed agenda – excellent. Some of the list is pretty cryptic but with many addresses & neighborhoods listed I can probably see if I’m interested in attending. What I don’t get is a link to the Planning Commission site to know who is on the commission. I search the city website and the best I can do is find the Planning & Urban Design Agency site which indicates they provide staff support for the Planning Commission. Someone looking at the Planning & Urban Design site doesn’t know about the upcoming meeting or agenda. The agenda from the Public Meetings site does tell me the next meeting will be January 5th – exactly 31 days from today. But, the upcoming 31 days on the Public Meetings site doesn’t list the January 5th meeting – the last one is listed for 12/27.

Next on the list is the Land Reutilization Authority (LRA) meeting, also on the 8th. Here I learn the meeting is at 8:30am at the same place most of these meetings are held – the 12th floor board room at 1015 Locust. No agenda, no link to the LRA site. Like most of these, a contact person is listed with phone number and email address. This one has a link to “SLDC Boards” but it simply takes you to the City web site – not to a list of SLDC Boards. But, a concise site with all the SLDC Boards does exist – click here for list. Once again I haven’t a clue who comprises the authority or what the upcoming agenda is.

Much of the rest of the list is in the same vain. You’ve got the Tax Increment Financing meeting without a clue who is making the decisions and what they are deciding. The Industrial Development Authority (IDA) at least has a working link to take you to the list of SLDC Boards but still no idea who makes up this authority or what is on the upcoming agenda. The Planned Industrial Expansion Authority (PIEA) public meeting notice is like the others – no link, no agenda and no clue who is makes up the authority.

Then we get to my favorite – the Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority (LCRA). A relic from the urban renewal days still abusing the powers of eminent domain for the public good. Of course, public good is now defined as a grandiose development plan with financing so complicated it is hard to see how much the tax payers are getting taken for but will give the Mayor and Alderman of the ward something to say they’ve done something. No agenda, no list of authority members, no link to site.

Same is true for the next three – the Port Authority Commission, the St. Louis Local Development Co. (LDC), and the St. Louis Development Corporation. No agenda, no list of decision makers and with the exception of the LDC, no link to a more detailed site. But, like all of SLDC boards, no agenda is provided online.

Last on the list is the Cultural Resource Preservation Board for Monday December 27th. I’m disappointed by the date because I’ll be out of town. The link to Planning & Urban Design sends you to the City’s site – not to Planning & Urban Design. I have Cultural Resources bookmarked and there I see the December meeting date, due to holidays, has changed to December 20th. The agenda is not yet posted yet but I know from past experience it will be. I also know from past experience it will be available in PDF format with all the detail presented at the meeting. Cultural Resources sets a great standard for informing the public. The Cultural Resources site is highly informative and includes a list of current Preservation Board members. I would prefer the list to show expiration dates of their terms but just knowing the names helps when you attend these public meetings.

Of the eleven upcoming public meetings I’ve got (or will have) two agendas, and only two lists of Board/Authority/Commission members. Sad.

While the Board of Adjustment, Board of Appeals and Board of Public Service are all public meetings they must not have any meetings in the coming month as past meetings were included on the Public Meetings site. But, like the others links to more information are either not provided at or too general to be helpful. These meetings are also publicized in the City Journal. This document is published weekly and is available by subscription or PDF online. The most recent issue is 18 pages of board bills and public notices. Basically, you’ve got to have lots of time on your hands, be paid to review these comings and goings, or be looking for something specific.

While the Public Meetings listing is hardly as informative as it could be, it is a start. It may take some phone calls or emails to find out an agenda or who is on the board. The pessimist in me says this information is absent or difficult to find on purpose – we wouldn’t want the public to be informed about the goings on within the government. Instead I’ll take the optimistic view that the city simply doesn’t have its act together with respect to the power of the internet.

When I get my act together, I intend to have a pretty exhaustive listing of links to various web sites relating to Urban Design – of local & general interest.

– Steve

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe