“The Securities and Exchange Commission has some really wacky requirements for securities firms. I am not personally aware of whether AGE’s black glass and “no stopping, standing”, etc. signs are because of SEC regulations. I have a suspicion that part of their design is most likely an effort to comply with privacy concerns and legal requirements from the SEC.”
The above are comments from a woman named Susan – the spouse of an AGE employee – in response to my critique of the AGE headquarters. from November 22, 2004. I responded to another AGE employee a few days later – click here for that response. Ok, on to my response to Susan’s comments…
You are kidding right? Oh, you’re not. Well, I have no doubt that privacy is a factor with respect to SEC regulations – I’ll give you that one. However, I seriously doubt the SEC cares if Securities Firms operate in an urban context with a pedestrian-friendly first floor that actually has a relationship to the street. They do have Securities Firms in Manhattan don’t they?
“I also am not sure if AGE ever did have a Jefferson entrance. Yet, I think this criticism is unfair–after all, the USPS designates street addresses–it’s not as if they had a choice in the matter.”
Oh come on, you are trying to make me laugh now. AGE’s address of One North Jefferson is a vanity address. As I previously mentioned, I applaud AGE for not insisting on something self serving like One Edwards Place. USPS would normally give AGE an address on Beaumont – simply based on the entrance location.
“Why should they put an entrance on Jefferson if one was never there? I understand that you are trying to apply the principles of urban planning here, yet I think you are criticizing them on some things that may have had many other contributing factors. Urban design, while important, is not the only factor in designing a corporate headquarters. I think that you may have overlooked some of these other mitigating factors.”
I was not suggesting they now build an entrance on Jefferson simply to have a door to justify the address. I was suggesting AGE and their Architect screwed up from day one – not taking advantage of a prominent city corner. AGE was not forced to place a parking garage on the prominent corner rather than a building entrance – it was a poor choice by the owners and/or architect.
My husband, and many of his coworkers, often frequent restaurants, bars, etc., in the area after work. AGE probably keeps a couple of those Mom n’ Pop bars open that are located near the campus. They have lots of happy hours, and they don’t travel out to the county for them–they patronize the businesses in the neighborhood. I don’t think it’s quite just to pan people for not patronizing art galleries on Washington. It’s just not some people’s cup of tea. Odds are that a bunch of financial geeks, business dorks, and IT workers don’t list art as their primary interest.”
True enough, art galleries are not for everyone – especially geeks, dorks and IT workers (Susan’s generalization, not mine). However, I did not see any signs of life immediately adjacent to the AGE campus. Where are these restaurants & bars you speak of? Perhaps they are a well kept secret? The fact remains, this area is devoid of street life and the AGE campus contributes to the lack of life in the area.
“However, I take issue with your assertion that places like AGE don’t encourage walking. There is a rather large city in Brazil that closed off 20 square blocks of its downtown area to auto traffic, thus making the world’s largest pedestrian mall. It has been wildly successful.”
I had to look this one up because I wasn’t aware of which city Susan was citing – Curitiba. I’m really glad she brought this up because its brings up a number of points I’d like to make. Let’s look at a few details…
• At the same time AGE was building its auto oriented headquarters Curitiba was adopting a master plan to limit auto traffic and sprawl.
• Curitiba started with a single street closed to autos and expanded as part of a master plan. However, the “street” remained opened to pedestrians. This is contrary to AGE’s campus where a number of streets have been completely removed from the grid – limiting choices for pedestrians.
• The overall density of Curitiba is similar to that of current St. Louis – however – three decades of strict land use plans have concentrated people along bus corridors to support their mass public transit over auto use.
• Car-free zones require a high density of pedestrians to be successful.
More information on Curitiba:
Curitiba, Three Decades of Thoughtful Planning
Orienting Urban Planning to Sustainability in Curitiba, Brazil
FRONTLINE: Curitiba’s Urban Experiment
I offer the following link with some reservation because I believe the site to be a pro-sprawl site. They are certainly anti-light rail. But, they have an interesting take on Curitiba – arguing how their approach to mass transit is efficient & cost-effective but the city is not the most appealing. Based on some of the pictures, I tend to agree. Curitiba: World Class Public Transport (PDF)
A great resource on creating great pedestrian-friendly places is Carfree Cities
“I applaud you for demanding better design, I would love to see more thoughtful planning and design in this city. However, I think that you have unfairly criticized AGE for things beyond its control. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. However, I thought you might want to be aware of some facts you may not have known about, such as SEC regulations, etc.”
AGE has been in control of the design of their campus from day one – no SEC or city regulation/building code required such a dreadful campus. Knowledge and willingness on the part of AGE and their architect would have resulted in a better campus.
I too would like to see better planning – it would prevent future AGE-esque atrocities.
– Steve