Home » Downtown » Recent Articles:

25 Year Old Gateway Parking Facility To Be Razed

ABOVE: Arch garage at the north end of Arch grounds

The multi-level parking garage at the north end of the Gateway National Expansion Memorial site will be razed as part of the City+Arch+River work to better connect the Arch to it’s surroundings.

While I agree the structure needs to be razed, it never should have been constructed in the first place.  More shocking is the structure is only 25 years old.

ABOVE: Gateway Arch Parking Facility Constructed 1986 plaque

I guess I knew the garage dated to 1986 but I forgot until I saw the above plaque last week. The garage was a joint effort of the city, National Park Service and Bi-State Development (now Metro).

ABOVE: Top level of the Arch garage, August 2010

The garage is a major barrier between the Arch and the Eads Bridge, MetroLink and Laclede’s Landing.

ABOVE: an suv exits the Arch garage onto Washington, October 2010

But isn’t it sad that we are having to undo decisions made just 25 years ago?

ABOVE: pedestrians from Laclede's Landing and MetroLink are directed to the Arch via this recent path, Oct 2010

– Steve Patterson

 

Happy 45th Birthday to the Mansion House Complex

Looking north on Memorial Drive from Pine
Looking north on Memorial Drive from Pine

Forty-five years ago today the three towers of the Mansion House complex on North 4th Street opened, representing the latest in urban planning in an era of Urban Renewal. Unfortunately, the architects didn’t read The Death and Life of Great American Cities by the late Jane Jacobs.

Center tower is set back behind fountain
Center tower is set back behind fountain

The buildings turn their back side to the Arch. Sure the towers have great views but sidewalk life was destroyed facing east.

ABOVE: looking south from Gentry’s Landing (north tower) on the promenade level

A 2nd floor outdoor “promenade” level was designed as a retail area removed from the street, the vision was people could leisurely stroll between all three towers. Ended up being too removed from regular pedestrians to succeed.

But the buildings have changed and evolved over the last 45 years. One example is at the corner of 4th & Pine, the lobby for the Crowne Plaza hotel.

Northeast corner of N 4th & Pine
Northeast corner of N 4th & Pine

This modern box is not original to the complex.  No, this corner was vastly different in 1966. Planners & architects at the time loved the notion of developments trying to incorporate everything. They knew they had destroyed blocks of authentic (but messy) urban life so they wanted to recreate it, just in an orderly fashion. So what was on this corner in 1966?

ABOVE: drawing of NE of N 4th & Pine from 1968 Sanborn map, courtesy of Landmarks Association

A filling station! The above Sanborn map from 1968 shows this, with a small structure at the corner. Interesting the drawing labeled Memorial Drive simply as “outer road.”

Thanks to Andrew Weil of Landmarks Association for finding & scanning this Sanborn map. Also. thanks to architects Fred Powers & Bill Bowersox of Powers Bowersox Associates, who told me of the former gas station.

– Steve Patterson

 

 

Readers Glad To See Bike Station & Shop Downtown

ABOVE: Downtown St. Louis Bike Station in use on Tuesday April 26, 2011

The poll (& post) last week was about downtown’s newest businesses – a bike station and bike shop:

Q: Will you use the new downtown bike station & shop?

  1. I won’t use either, but I’m glad to see they are opening 49 [32.03%]
  2. I’ll use the bike shop, but not the bike station 24 [15.69%]
  3. I’ll use both the station and shop 20 [13.07%]
  4. I won’t use either 14 [9.15%]
  5. I don’t live in St. Louis 14 [9.15%]
  6. I might use one or both 13 [8.5%]
  7. Other answer… 11 [7.19%]
  8. Unsure at this time 6 [3.92%]
  9. I’ll use the bike station, but not the bike shop 2 [1.31%]

The bike station & shop are clearly appealing to many readers, but the numbers of users is limited due to the niche nature.

Here are the eleven other answers provided by readers:

  1. Would use it if I worked Downtown
  2. the city sucks and steals ideas from young people
  3. Bike lanes are a waste of good driving lanes.
  4. I’ll drive my car and arrive to work clean and on time.
  5. I don’t live in downtown STL anymore so I no longer need a bike to commute.
  6. Already signed up as a member!
  7. I no longer live in STL, but I’ll promote both to family/friends as always.
  8. don’t use downtown
  9. nope
  10. I’d use it every day if I worked in the area.
  11. Wish there were one near Barnes

The bike station had a soft opening on the 21st.  At 10am tomorrow both the station and Urban Shark bike shop will hold their grand openings.

ABOVE: Downtown Bike Station entry is off a dead-end alley

From a September 8, 2010 press release:

The City of St. Louis applied for a Federal Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant from the Department of Energy to specifically fund this project. These funds were designated for energy-saving projects, and had to be approved by the Department of Energy. From the grant the City received, $181,600 will cover the costs to buy the lockers, interior bike racks, and fund the operational costs of the Downtown Bike Center’s first two years. The Downtown Community Improvement District and other partners will provide additional funding.

“We are building a City that provides an attractive way of life. After World War II, the car was a symbol of freedom. For some people today, it is just the opposite,” said Mayor Slay. “We look forward to working with the Downtown St. Louis CID and Loftworks to ensure the long-term success of this public bike center and the City’s cycling initiative.”

“This project will help cement Downtown as a walkable, livable neighborhood where you can rely on alternatives to the car,” said Maggie Campbell, Partnership President and CEO. “We are thrilled to be working with the community to realize this sustainable investment.”

“Since vehicle emissions contribute about a third of the Greenhouse Gasses into the environment, we wanted to use these ARRA Stimulus funds to promote an alternative mode of transportation,” said Catherine Werner, the City’s Sustainability Director. “By enabling St. Louis commuters to choose cycling as an affordable and attractive option, the City is demonstrating its commitment to being a healthy and sustainable community.”

Additional information:

– Steve Patterson

 

 

 

Gettin’ Downtown With Ozzie Monday April 25th

April 22, 2011 Downtown, Events/Meetings, Homeless Comments Off on Gettin’ Downtown With Ozzie Monday April 25th
ABOVE: banner of Washington Ave advertising the 4/25 event at Ozzie's (1511 Washington Ave)

Monday (4/25/2011) from 5pm-9pm is your chance to meet former St. Louis Cardinal Ozzie Smith and raise money to assist an organization providing needed meals & services for the homeless and at-risk persons, proceeds benefit The Bridge.

ABOVE: for many The Bridge at 1610 Olive means a warm meal and use of a phone or computer

Both Ozzie’s and The Bridge are neighbors of mine, I can even see the latter from my balcony.

– Steve Patterson

 

Century SLAPP Suit Six Years Old Today

April 19, 2011 Downtown 6 Comments
ABOVE: Former Century Building. Image via Built St. Louis, click image to view entry

Six years ago today  a “malicious prosecution” lawsuit was filed against two downtown residents/property owners over their earlier lawsuits questioning the legality of the deals that ultimately led to the razing of the historic Century Building (case #22052-01373).  Marcia Behrendt & Roger Plackemeier, both friends,  remain defendants today. The plaintiffs have delayed the case numerous times over the years.

To win a suit for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) that the original case was terminated in favor of the plaintiff, (2) that the defendant played an active role in the original case, (3) that the defendant did not have probable cause or reasonable grounds to support the original case, and (4) that the defendant initiated or continued the initial case with an improper purpose. Each of these elements presents a challenge to the plaintiff.

I’m no lawyer but here is what I know:

  1. The original case was dropped after demolition crews began razing the building, making a court victory a moot point.
  2. True, they did.
  3. Based on what I’ve seen they did have probable cause, proving otherwise seems difficult.
  4. Like #3 their purpose seems legit.  But that was 2003-04, a lot has happened since then.

Plaintiffs are the Missouri Development Finance Board, Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Louis and two private developer entities. So the State of Missouri and the City of St. Louis have been parties in this case for the last six years.  Wow, I can only imagine the legal fees they, I mean we, have payed so far in this case against these two.

I consider this a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) suit.  A jury trial is currently scheduled to start on May 16, 2011 before judge Ohmer, but I’m not holding my breath.

– Steve Patterson

Prior posts:

 

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe