Home » Events/Meetings » Recent Articles:

Initial Thoughts on CBD Traffic Study

I attended the presentation today on the downtown traffic study. Here are my initial thoughts:

  • Boundary for study should have included Cole on the North rather than Lucas. Other boundaries includes Memorial on the East, Spruce on the South, and Tucker on the West.
  • Doug Shatto, President of the consulting firm Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier did an excellent job of explaining the tradeoffs between various methods such as one-way vs. two-way streets. I felt he understands what it takes to create a pedestrian & retail-friendly environment. What I didn’t get was a sense that he will fight for that. Instead I think he’ll do whatever the city tells him.
  • The steering committee is still undecided on many aspects of the project and they are looking for feedback before making a final decision most likely next week. I will review some of the things up for debate and a few others that should be.
  • Washington Avenue East of Tucker. While they say that on-street parking has not been ruled out I’m suspicious. They hinted at allowing parking except during peak hours. I pointed out after the meeting to Doug Shatto how KitchenK will not use their sidewalk cafe license until they have a row of parked cars to make sidewalk dining more hospitable to their patrons. I also pointed out that Copia is allowed to take a traffic lane for valet parking. If we can take a lane for a valet we can certainly take the balance of the lane for parking as the flow is already restricted. I still want to see on-street parking all the way from Tucker to at least Broadway.

    I asked at the end of the meeting about Cole street being abel to take some of the traffic off Washington Avenue. Shatto did indicate that if Washington Avenue was restricted from four lanes to two lanes through drivers would likely alter their route and use the nearly vacant Cole. Another factor that may reduce some traffic on Washington Avenue is people going around the block due to one-way streets. They are recommending changing 8th & 11th from one-way to two-way (more later).

  • Streets they deemed “appropriate” to change from one-way to two-way were 8th, 11th (North of Market only), and Walnut (from Tucker to either to 4th or Broadway).
  • Streets they deemed “inappropriate” to change from one-way to two-way were 9th, 10th and Pine.
  • Streets they deemed “inappropriate but viable” to change from one-way to two-way were 6th, 7th, and Locust.
  • One-way streets not even mentioned were Broadway or Chestnut.
  • The immediate plan (2006) is to change the controllers for the existing signals. This will allow them greater flexibility in controlling the signals via computer. This might include changing the timing for game days or setting the signals to flash after a certain time. I think changing the timing makes sense as this could help with special events. I’m not sure how I feel about the flashing signals after hours. Does this say we have so little going on that we don’t need normal timing? Or does it say that we change over to a pedestrian environment after hours?
  • They mentioned trying to change Missouri law to allow a left turn on red on one-way streets. Apparently this is allowed in 16 or so states but not Missouri. It is commonplace downtown to see drivers do this.
  • I think they did an excellent job of evaluating pedestrian concerns and will do a good job upgrading the system and reducing conflicts. One of the changes it to go to a simple two-phase system where pedestrians are permitted to cross with the flow of traffic. Currently some intersections are considered scrambled where pedestrians can cross any direction while cars wait. While this sounds good that also means that they are generally not allowed to cross with the flow. It seems more natural to have the simpler system.
  • Conversion of streets to two-way is a long term goal and may take a number of years, mostly due to lack of funding.
  • One part of the plan was looking at a 2004 Streetscape plan for downtown. This called for a wider median on Tucker. This would reduce the total number of lanes two three in each direction — including parking lanes. The drawings shown did not include parking although on-street parking could be included. While I agree that Tucker is way too wide I think not having on-street parking at times is a mistake.
  • The proposed Mississippi River bridge was considered as part of the plan but the future MetroLink loop through downtown was not considered. Hmmmm.
  • As Shutte said in the presentation different users have conflicting demands. The CEO wants his/her employees getting to/from work quickly while the retailer wants a great environment for customers to stroll and spend. It is a trade off and we must “strike a balance.” For the last 50 years or so the balance has been decidedly off balance with the emphasis toward moving cars quickly, people be damned. My first reaction is that we need to tilt the scale dramatically the other way and screw traffic flow as retribution for the last 50 years. But that will just cause other problems that will need to be solved in time. Currently the scale is out of balance big time in favor of cars and the proposed changes bring it much closer to the middle ground they just don’t go quite far enough to create a true balance. Just a little more guys!
  • – Steve

     

    Clang, clang, clang went the trolley

    stltrolleyribbon.jpg

    Twenty years from now December 5th, 2005, will be regarded as a significant date in the history of the St. Louis region. Why you ask? Today the ribbon was cut to open two restored trolley cars to the public. We are still a long way from the ridding the trolley cars from the History Museum to the U-City City Hall but this was an important next step.

    Cutting the ribbon from left to right is Kim Tucci, Joe Edwards, Desmond Lee, St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay, St. Louis County Executive Charles Dooley, and University City Mayor Joseph Adams.

    Earlier today, generous St. Louisan Desmond Lee contributed $25,000 toward the $32 million dollar project.

    I’m not going to go into all the details of the project here. You can read more from Citizens for Modern Transit, Trolleys To Go, and Heritage Trolley.

    What I will say is this cannot come soon enough!



    … Continue Reading

     

    Mississippi Bluffs Project To Destroy More Than the Doering Mansion

    Before I attended last Monday’s Preservation Board meeting my main problem with this develop was that it called for razing the derelict, but salvageable, Doering Mansion. During the meeting I got a closer look at the details of the final project and I didn’t like what I saw.

    From the marketing literature:

    “Compromising fifty-six townhouses on eight acres, Mississippi Bluffs is offered by Mississippi Bluffs, L.L.C. On the east lies the Mississippi River; to the west, a beautifully landscaped park. The townhouses have been thoughtfully designed, using the colors of nature with respect to this unique site. Two tiers of homes allow for the greatest embrace of the spectacular view, one built on the natural bluff, the other on a massive bluff extension.”

    bluffsiteplan.jpg

    This glosses over a couple of problems, the “beautifully landscaped park” and the “massive bluff extension.” The open green we are used to seeing along the site will basically be reduced in half as the 32 “Hilltop” units will be much closer to Broadway. The new “bluff”, better known as a pile of fill dirt, will raise the grade substantially. This will necessitate the removal of many existing trees.

    At left is the proposed site plan with the river along the top and Broadway along the bottom. The gray roofs shown in the middle are the “Hilltop” units built on top of artificial fill. A drive runs along the West side of these buildings to serve all 32 garages. Guest parking is provided along this drive.

    Alderman Villa testified at the meeting that other developers such as Balke-Brown had proposed “affordable” apartments for the site while retaining the Doering Mansion. But Villa didn’t want apartments. A few neighbors & some folks buying into the project spoke that having townhouses was better than more apartments. Some noted problems down the street with current section 8 housing. They all spoke as though the only alternatives to the current proposal was going to be apartments. Hardly true but effective.



    … Continue Reading

     

    Festivus vs. Rams

    I was downtown yesterday and today. Both days had lots of people but the feeling was totally different. Saturday was the “Festivus” celebration with lots of stores and restaurants open and people milling about on the sidewalk. It was thrilling to see so many people spending time shopping downtown.

    Today was different. It was a Rams football game. I had already committed to be downtown so I couldn’t back out. Normally you couldn’t get me close to downtown during a major event such as a Rams game. Tons of suburbanites clogging our streets all headed for one destination, all at roughly the same time. When they are done they are all leaving at the same time. It is completely unnatural and the total opposite of the joy I experienced on Saturday. The Rams games only happens downtown 10 times per year but it seems like we went through a lot to make it happen. The saga and expense is hardly over.

    For 2005 we had to ensure the dome was in the “first tier” of NFL stadiums or the Rams could have exercised a clause in their lease to give us a year’s notice to leave. With the stadium only 10 years old that wasn’t such a big deal. But what about in 2015 when the same clause comes up again? Will we will be in the top 25% of stadiums? Doubtful. How much will it cost us at that time to keep the Rams around? Since we are 10 years into a 30-year lease this means we are only 15 years away from starting to discuss replacing the dome because it is outdated and no longer competitive with the stadiums of other teams.

    The state and city still have 20 years to pay for the building. St. Louis County uses hotel taxes to pay their share, assuming tourism holds out. With updates to keep the Rams happy we will have likely spent a billion dollars over a 30-year period. That works out to just over $3 million for each regular season home game. When paid for we will most likely have an antiquated and obsolete structure on our hands. Old Wal-Mart stores become thrift stores, indoor paint ball centers and such but what do you do with an old football stadium?

    If we didn’t have to keep paying the $6 million per year to pay for the stadium I’d say let the Rams leave in 2015. But we can’t afford to let that happen, we are too much in debt. We need them more than they need us. I can just see myself selling someone a house and saying that after paying for it for 30 years and maintaining it along the way that when they finally own it they’ll likely need to junk it and start over. Somehow what doesn’t work for a $200K house will work on a sports stadium costing hundreds of millions of dollars. The irony is that investment firm Edward Jones has the naming rights to the building. I wonder how they’d advise their clients about investing in sports stadiums?

    But the dome wasn’t necessarily supposed to pay for itself. It was seen as a way to rejuvenate downtown. Translated that means clearing away old properties, building a massive building to help out the buddies that own contracting companies to house a team owned by other rich buddies — all of whom give generously to political campaigns. The sad reality is the dome and convention center are major detractors of the urban environment in St. Louis.

    This massive building presents a blank face on all sides except Washington Avenue. But even the Washington Avenue face contributes little to the life of the city with the row of taxi cabs blocking the sidewalk. You see people coming and going during conventions but even then it is not part of the urban experience even for a downtown resident. Well, it is part of the experience in that huge events are something to avoid. Residents in lofts further West such as the Sporting News Building at 2020 Washington should be thankful they are far removed from the “benefits” of major events.

    The year after the football Cardinals left for Arizona we began this costly road to get football back in St. Louis. It has cost us a pretty penny and will continue to do so for the next 20 years. I say if it will cost us more than $30 million to stay in the “first tier” in 2015 then don’t even bother. Let the Rams leave. Tear the place down along with the rest of the convention center. Put back the street grid and sell of fthe individual blocks to developers to pay off the debt. Let the developers build new buildings to bring life to the area. But no superblocks, I want a start grid. And no massive buildings taking up the entire blocks, I want at least 3 separate buildings per block. It will be a great place. We’ll call it Frontiere Village.

    [UPDATE 12/5 8:30AM – It has been suggested in the comments section that I’m being overly negative and stereotypical in my views. Let me clarify a couple of things. Sports fan have no choice but to clog the streets to get to the dome — that was the poor choice that was made not by the Rams or the sports fans but by anti-urban leadership that believes such events are a positive addition to a downtown. They are not. I don’t blame the fans, or the Rams, or the NFL. In fact, with the debt we need them to come and help pay for the thing. I just don’t want to be around. On the other hand, on Saturday it was many suburbanites that came for Festivus but they were there to enjoy city life. Again, no value judgement but it was just a much better fit. I’m a strong believer that huge single purpose venues just don’t belong in a place where you want a lively city life. Some rare exceptions do exist in the country but those are older examples. New stadiums and domes seldom fit in to the fabric, even when faced with red brick. So all you Rams fans keep coming down for the games, I’m make sure I’m off the road so you’ll be able to get through.]

    – Steve

     

    Observations of ‘Guns-N-Hoses’ Charity Event

    November 29, 2005 Events/Meetings 6 Comments

    Last Wednesday evening I attended the annual Guns-N-Hoses boxing event which raises money for Backstoppers, a highly worthwhile organization. Unlike previous years, I was seated in a luxury box. Wow, what a difference. All the luxury and social isolation of suburbia.

    Walking around the regular folks I saw an interesting shirt on what I presumed was a police officer. On the back were big letters BDRT and in small letters the explanation — Baby’s Daddy Removal Team. Nice, huh?

    [update 11/29 @ 10pm. For more explanation on the meaning read this.]

    – Steve

     

    Advertisement



    [custom-facebook-feed]

    Archives

    Categories

    Advertisement


    Subscribe