Controversial “Blairmont” Project to be Revealed Tonight
Tonight we expect politically connected developer Paul McKee, of McEagle Development, to publicly unveil the controversial development project nicknamed “Blairmont.”
The project got this name after one of the early holding companies used to acquire properties, Blairmont Associates LLC.
Here is a video that explains Blairmont:
Another source of info on Blairmont is a January 2007 RFT article.
Out of the controversy came an August 2007 bus tour of McKee’s properties. Here is 5th Ward Alderman April Ford Griffin:
The next month the meetings continued. Here is 19th Ward Alderman Marlene Davis:
I got involved by asking a question of Alderman April Ford Griffin. Griffin is the chair of the Neighborhood Development committee at the Board of Aldermen. She has a warped view of zoning. Rather than have excellent zoning that codifies the community vision, she likes outdated zoning so developers must come to her. The video starts out rough but gets better:
Congressman Clay talks about a hearing held at city hall with a reference to the 1970s Team Four plan that called for reducing services in parts of the city:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsx_Ph8vEj41976
Here is a summary of the infamous Team Four plan:
This document contains the technical memorandum that was submitted to the Plan Commission by Team Four, Inc. in 1975. This memorandum proposed public policy guidelines and strategies for implementing the Draft Comprehensive Plan that was prepared by others. It offered a series of considerations concerning the process of adopting, staging, budgeting and ultimately implementing the Draft Comprehensive Plan. In addition, this document contains a preface dated 1976 that attempts to clean up any inconsistencies and or controversies surrounding the proposed implementation strategies and a bibliography or annotated listing of Technical Memoranda and Appendixes. Part I of this document focused on strategies for three generic area types: conservation, redevelopment, and depletion areas; and Part II of this document discussed major urban issues and their solutions.
Today “shrinking cities” are studied and various techniques are debated. In the 70s in St. Louis the Team Four plan was seen as a racist plot to deny services to a minority population. We know more today about how to adjust to shrinking populations.
Tonight we will see another, a huge heavily subsidized redevelopment plan. Many are opposed simply based on the history of the project to date. I for one plan to go with an open mind. I have reservations about both the developer and the political leadership. Griffin’s view on the role of zoning doesn’t give me a lot of hope for what may be presented in pretty artist renderings actually being completed as promised. A good framework of a zoning code can help ensure the promised vision develops into reality.
Tonight’s meeting starts at 7pm at Central Baptist Church Education Building 2843 Washington Ave (Google Map). I’ll be there and will report on the presentation next week.