Home » Board of Aldermen » Recent Articles:

Time to Think About Running for Office

In less than a year the City of St Louis will have elections for half the Board of Aldermen — the 14 odd numbered seats. If you’d like to see some change in how the city is managed now is the perfect time to begin planning your campaign. I ran for the 25th back in 2005 and it was a very rewarding experience.

At this point you must already live in the ward in which you’d run in. Not sure what ward you live in? Then you probably shouldn’t run for office.

Those seats up for grabs next year are (existing Alderman):

 

Alderman Wants Gasoline Allowance

Jake Wagman of the Post-Dispatch has reported on a new bill introduced at the Board of Aldermen today:

Even at City Hall, high gas prices have drivers concerned.

That’s why Alderman Charles Q. Troupe has a relief plan — for aldermen, at least.

Troupe plans on introducing a bill at tomorrow’s meeting that would give alderman an “expense account” for their fuel costs.

While “riding the ward” is a staple of aldermanic duty — right up there with returning phone calls and sending birthday wishes — it seems unlikely that Troupe’s colleagues would endorse his plan to charge taxpayers for their gas.

In looking at Board Bill 83 we see how much Troupe is seeking:

Each alderman shall receive a monthly sum equal to four hundred (400) miles multiplied by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) standard mileage rate for business miles driven.

The 2008 IRS rate is 50.5 cents per mile. So that is an extra $202 per alderman per month. That comes to just under $68K per year at the current IRS rate.

Aldermen are not well compensated until you consider the job is part time — $32,000/year plus a $4,200 expense allowance. Many aldermen have full time jobs that give them enough freedom to make day meetings. Do we really think each of the 28 aldermen are driving 400 miles for aldermanic business each and every month? I don’t think so.

Like everyone else the aldermen will need to find more efficient ways of getting around. At least one alderman, Phyllis Young, drives a Toyota Prius Hybrid.  Should she get the same allowance as someone that drives a less efficient vehicle?  What if an alderman only drives 175 for business in a given month?  What if they just buy their own damn gas like everyone else does?  If they don’t like it they can seek out alternatives.

 

Cherokee Street May Remain a “dry” Street

Ald. Craig Schmid (D-20th) is continuing his anti drinking establishment campaign in the 20th ward, which includes parts of Cherokee St West of Jefferson Ave. Schmid has introduced new legislation titled “Prohibiting package liquor in the 20th Ward.” (see BB47) The exception is for restaurants that get at least 35% of their revenue from food sales.

Schmid’s attitude is summed up in the bill as legislative findings:

The existence of alcoholic beverage establishments appears to contribute directly to numerous peace, health, safety and general welfare problems including loitering, littering, drug trafficking, prostitution, public drunkenness, defacement and damaging of structures, pedestrian obstructions, as well as traffic circulation, parking and noise problems on public streets and neighborhood lots. The existence of such problems creates serious impacts on the health, safety and welfare of residents of single- and multiple-family residences within the district, including fear for the safety of children, elderly residents and of visitors to the district. The problems also contribute to the deterioration of the neighborhood and concomitant devaluation of property and destruction of community values and quality of life. The number of establishments selling alcoholic beverages and the associated problems discourage more desirable and needed commercial uses in the area. In order to preserve the residential character and the neighborhood-serving commercial uses of the area.

Wow, why do we allow such debauchery to run rampant throughout the rest of the city? Gee, maybe because he is operating under the false impression that prostitution will cease to exist if only people can’t buy a drink at a bar.

Oh but it gets better:

the Excise Commissioner shall have authority to:

(3) Issue a drink license only with the following conditions applied and enforced in an area with a Cherokee Street address from the west curbline of Iowa Avenue to the east curbline of Nebraska Avenue
16
A. No package liquor and premises must be operated as a restaurant with gross food sales constituting at least 35% of gross sales; and
B. Operator of the premises must have and maintain at all times written permission to use a public commercial parking facilities within 350 feet of the premis:
with a minimum of at least 15 parking spaces (paved, striped, having a six foot good quality, sturdy ornamental metal fence surrounding it and adequate lighting, and with concrete wheel stops, all complying with City of St. Louis requirements); and if there is live entertainment or live performances, with a minimum of at least 30 parking spaces (paved, striped, having a six foot good quality, sturdy ornamental metal fence surrounding it and adequate lighting, and with concrete wheel stops, all complying with City of St. Louis requirements); and having at a minimum at least 30 additional parking spaces for every 1000 square feet of business space in excess of the first 1000 square feet of business space.

Well, there we have it. More parking in an urban neighborhood commercial district.

And we all love establishments with cafe tables — as long as they keep a clear path. But what about a cafe table behind a 4ft high fence?

J. Sidewalk tables for restaurant purposes only may only be permitted in accordance with an extension of premises permit with an appropriate 4 foot high good quality, sturdy, black ornamental metal fence separating the tables from the rest of the minimum 4 foot wide public sidewalk;

The reality is nobody is going to open a wine bar under such conditions which probably suits Schmid just fine.  This isn’t a class thing for Schmid — the person who downs a $2 bud is just as bad as friends that share a $40 bottle of wine.

To the business association this legislation would be an impediment to competing with other commercial districts where the rules are less restrictive.  To me Schmid only knows how to run off perceived problems — he hasn’t a clue how to bring life back to a once thriving commercial street.

 

St. Louis Board of Aldermen Recognizes Rollin Stanley

Today the St. Louis Board of Aldermen passed Resolution #323 thanking Rollin Stanley for his five years of service to the city.  Many aldermen expressed thanks for his help in planning assistance in their wards. Stanley indicated he left with a heavy heart, indicating he is more proud of his work in St. Louis over the last five years than his prior 21 years in Toronto.  Stanley is leaving his post as the Director of the Planning & Urban Design Agency to take a similar position with Montgomery County, Maryland (see prior post).

 

Bill Would Make Plaza Square Apartments A Housing Conservation District

Plaza Square, the urban renewal era apartment complex listing on the National Register of Historic Places, has been having some issues of late.  Elevators not working properly and so on.  The city seems to have an answer, make the complex a “housing conservation district” as exists in much of the city.  Such a district requires inspections each and every time a tenant changes apartments unless that change happened within the 12 months since the last inspection.  This would be the first such district in downtown St. Louis.
While I support efforts to ensure the overall public safety, this measure, Board Bill 328, seems to target a single property with two owners of record.  The Blu condo project, part of the original Plaza Square complex but under separate ownership for many years, is excluded from the proposed district.  In fact, the proposed district is an island all to itself — not an extension of an adjacent district.

My guess here is that this is a legal move to force the property owner into selling out the property to someone else.   Maybe that is best in the long term but in the short term such targeted use of our laws seems punitive.  BB328 was introduced in October by Ald Young (D-7th) but it hasn’t gotten far.  Next Thursday (1/24) at 1pm the Public Safety Committee of the Board of Alderman will take up this bill.  This meeting is open to the public.

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe