Readers Think The Tour Of Missouri Was A Good Use Of Tourism Dollars
Last week 181 people voted in the poll:
Q: The 2010 Tour of Missouri has been canceled due to zero funding from the state, which of the following best describes your thoughts:
- The Tour of Missouri has been a great event, bringing money into the state economy each year — a good use of tax money 97 [53.59%]
- The Tour of Missouri has been a victim of fighting between Republicans and Democrats 36 [19.89%]
- The Tour of Missouri has been a money pit, costing more than it made — a good decision to cancel 22 [12.15%]
- Other answer… 14 [7.73%]
- Unsure/no opinion 12 [6.63%]
The (14) other answers were:
- If it’s so successful, they should plan for it’s financial viability.
- screw the bicyclists. when do I get my own lane to drive in?
- Killed by Nixon for a petty political vendetta. Politics at its worst.
- Sad…
- Even the Tour de France commentators said its a shame it got canceled
- What a shame. Where was the money spent instead? What was the return?
- This happened MONTHS ago. Why are you only addressing it now?
- Jay Nixon needs to go for this! What a joke!
- B and C
- Not sure why this can’t be privately funded, the state gave it a good start
- The Tour of MO should be able to fund itself by corporate donations and sponsors
- Tourism should have cut back to $500K or so.
- Not necessarily the best way to spend state money.
- When the economy is bad, nonessentials get cut.
– Steve Patterson