Home » Politics/Policy » Recent Articles:

The Easing of the St. Louis Police Residency Requirement

April 27, 2005 Politics/Policy 11 Comments

In the nearly 15 years I’ve lived in St. Louis I have supported residency requirements for city employees and the St. Louis Police. I’ve met some great cops that enjoyed living in the city. Unfortunately, I’ve also met my share of officers that had a chip on their shoulder about the city. Granted, in their line of work they don’t exactly encounter the best the city has to offer. Here is the info on the new rule:

“Under the rule passed Friday, officers who leave the city will have to live within an hour from the patrol station where they work. That requirement was amended from an earlier proposal that said officers must live either in the city or St. Louis County. The goal presumably is to ensure that police are available quickly in an emergency. The commissioners did not specify how they would measure whether an officer’s residence is within 60 minutes of work.” Reported Jake Wagman of the Post-Dispatch;

“The Police Board voted 3-2 to allow officers with seven years of service to live outside the city limit, effective immediately. About three-fourths of 1,360 current officers are immediately eligible to move. New officers will have to complete training and a probationary period before their experience will count toward the seven years.”

It is because of the sometimes bad attitude that I am not so upset about this change. Let them move. Maybe they will approach the public with better attitudes? That when those of us that like the city complain about something they won’t give us lip about thats what we should expect in the city. If they move it certainly can’t make their attitudes any worse. Again, not all cops have bad attitudes. Just enough to leave a bad taste in my mouth.

I choose to live in the city because I love city living. I hope once these cops are not longer forced to live in the city they will open their eyes and choose to stay.

– Steve

 

New Civil Courts Plazas Lack Bike Racks

April 20, 2005 Planning & Design, Politics/Policy Comments Off on New Civil Courts Plazas Lack Bike Racks

civilcourts_01.jpg

After a number of years the new plazas and landscaping on the East and West entrances to the Civil Courts building are finally done. The material choices are nice as are the plantings. Numerous benches are provided for waiting jurors. But one thing is missing…

Bike racks.

How can we expect property owners to make provisions for bicycle parking when the city doesn’t do so on its own projects?

In the city’s new 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan Strategy the city makes very little mention of bicycling.

Looking at the Transportation (5.7mb PDF) section of Chapter 7 (Public Services, Facilities and Infrastructure) I found a small mention in the list of transportation recommendations:

#13 – Increase the attraction of downtown for bicycle commuters.
Chicago is planning to build a large bicycle facility downtown where commuters can store their bike, have repairs made, take a shower, rent a locker, and have refreshments. It is one of many steps Chicago has taken to make downtown bicycle friendly. The City of St. Louis should explore a similar facility, possibly partnered with a downtown corporation. Increased bike lanes are also needed Downtown.”

That’s it? Eleven pages on transportation for the entire city and all bicycling gets is a pie in the sky dream of a downtown bike facility? Chicago was able to make their facility work because they’ve spent a number of years nurturing & building the bicycle community. They’ve installed thousands of bike racks throughout the city. The Chicago Department of Transportation has a special website called Chicago Bikes where they communicate all things cycling in Chicago. Through the site citizens can request a rack anywhere in the city. Chicago installs over 750 racks per year. I doubt we have a total of 75 public bike racks in the City of St. Louis.

Yes, a downtown bicycle facility with covered parking and shower facilities would be welcomed. I just think it is a down the road idea. We’ve got several basic steps before such a facility should be considered. Installing a few racks in front of the Civil Courts building would be a good start.

– Steve

 

For St. Louis, Great Expectations but a Slow-Rolling Renaissance

Recently the New York Times ran a story called, “For St. Louis, Great Expectations but a Slow-Rolling Renaissance.” Naturally, I have some opinions.

ST. LOUIS, April 5 – People here joke that the sidewalks get rolled up at night as workers flee to the suburbs, but through the N.C.A.A. basketball tournament that ended on Monday, the sidewalks got washed instead. St. Louis primped and spruced and papered its empty buildings with signs about the rosy days to come and got its television close-up in front of millions of viewers around the world.

The same can be said for many US cities both bigger and smaller. At least we have sidewalks to roll up or wash – most newer suburbs are not even remotely walkable anytime of the day.

But much of the city’s upbeat message was intended for consumption at home, where urban pioneers like John and Mary Kelly have staked their fortunes on making the renaissance real. The couple opened Kelly’s Deli four years ago on what was then a nearly abandoned block of downtown, and they still have great expectations because of the conversion of vacant buildings into loft-style apartments in their neighborhood and the escalating real-estate prices that are drawing investors.

I’ve seen Kelly’s Deli a number of times when I am downtown but they are never open when I am there. Their hours are 7am to 2pm Monday through Friday according to Sauce Magazine. But Sauce also says Kelly’s is located on the Landing but at 1104 Locust it is a good 10-12 blocks from the Landing.

But for St. Louis, which lost half its population in the decades after World War II, and for the Kellys, the good times still remain mostly unrealized. The basketball crowds gave a nice jolt to the cash register, they said. And the event put as much as $60 million into the local economy over four days of revelry, economic development officials said. But by Tuesday it was business as usual.

“I don’t know how long we can hold on,” Mr. Kelly said.

Suggestion Mr. Kelly, try being open more than 35 hours per week. Try being open on the first Friday of the month when hundreds of people are walking the sidewalks going from gallery to store. UMA around the corner from you in the same building gets many visitors on these Friday nights. Please don’t blame St. Louis because the week day morning and lunch crowd isn’t enough to cover your overhead.

The calculus of rehabilitating any wounded city is partly about experimenting until something that works is found. St. Louis is pinning its hopes on architecture, specifically its stock of glorious old buildings that now stand like monuments to a vanished economy of manufacturing might. But selling the portrait of that recovery, city officials and development leaders say, is complicated by history and myth and the deep divisions in Missouri politics, and to a certain extent by the even trickier terrain of sexual orientation.

Trickier terrain of sexual orientation? This should be good…

The city is an island of Democratic voters in a sea of increasingly conservative rural and suburban ones. It suffers from a reputation as a dangerous place, which tends to keep many outsiders from venturing in. And the recovery effort has partly been led by members of a group that is not popular in many parts of Missouri: gay men and lesbians who have renovated neighborhoods and opened new businesses in recent years.

In August, voters across the state overwhelming voted yes on an amendment to the State Constitution banning same-sex marriage. St. Louis, in a lonely dissent, voted no.

St. Louis does suffer from many negative perceptions which, in my view, are largely outdated or just false. I’ve lived in North St. Louis and never been shot or even shot at. With very few exceptions, I’ve parked on the street for nearly 15 years and my car has never been stolen. Granted, a few of my cars I would have had to pay someone to take.

Gays & Lesbians are an important part of revitalizing St. Louis and similar cites. A good source for information on this is Richard Florida’s Creative Class.

The city’s population, which was more than 850,000 in 1950, had fallen to 348,000 people by 2000, with many of those who left now living in the city’s ring of suburbs.

I am so over seeing these numbers. Out of context they mean very little. In 1950 St. Louis had substantial overcrowding. Basements and attics were poorly converted to living spaces to accommodate all the people. We either had to build up or out. Unfortunately, we chose to build out into the beautiful rolling hills of St. Louis County. Along the way we razed much of our area for highways, “open space”, housing projects and wider streets. All this past urban renewal forced out a good many of these people. With all the land devoted to highways, ever larger hospital complexes and universities we’d have to build much higher today than we would have in 1950. We don’t need 850,000 people again to be a rich, vibrant city. I’m targeting 700,000 eventually with a 500,000 in the next 20 years.

– Steve

 

Smoking Ban Clears the Way for Non-Smokers to Enjoy Going Out

As St. Louis County considers a ban on smoking in public spaces the rhetoric is increasing. Chief among the anti-ban comments is smokers won’t stay around restaurants and spend money. Unlike California we don’t have the weather for year round patio use to keep smokers spending money. So the scare tactic is smokers will quickly leave restaurants and won’t watch games at bars. BS.

A remotely valid argument is that while smoking doesn’t hurt business it doesn’t help either. That is, restaurants in non-smoking states grow at slower rates than restaurants in smoking states. It is hard to say if this is true as so many studies are being thrown around. Lets assume it is true.

What about the growth rate of lung cancer in states with smoking bans? It is too early to know the long term effects (pro & con) of a smoking ban. I think St. Louis County, St. Louis City and the entire State of Missouri should be give it a try. If it turns out in 2025 that the ban didn’t have the desired results then allow smoking again. In the meantime I can actually enjoy going out for a couple of decades.

Most restaurants have a non-smoking section but often I end up 5 feet away from the smoking section with nothing to keep the smoke away from me. As a lifetime non-smoker I just can’t consume food around smoke. It is not appetizing. Still other places are in the dark ages and they don’t even offer a non-smoking section. Like most people, I enjoy dining alfresco but smokers are on the patio as well. Trying to get a meal without smoke is not exactly easy.

Going out to a bar for a beer is a different story. I’m not trying to eat food so I am bit more tolerant. Still, after a couple of hours my throat begins to get sore. I just can’t take it nor do I want to learn. Coming home from a night out means my clothing goes directly into the washing machine. Visits to California are so refreshing.

I can imagine that it is tough for smokers to quit. Everywhere they go people are smoking. Hardly conducive to quitting. Perhaps if these smokers quit they’d have more money to spend in restaurants and bars on food and drink? Or they have more money to spend on other consumer goods?

So in all the talk about the smokers going home early so they can light up where is the discussion of us non-smokers that might eat out more. That we might stay for dessert knowing we are going enjoy the moment. Or that we might go out for drinks rather than meet for drinks at home. Yes, restaurants & bars may lose some smokers’ business but they will gain the business of non-smokers.

I’m not a prude. If someone wants to drink I don’t care. If they want to smoke some pot I don’t care. If someone wants to smoke cigarettes I don’t care. I begin to care when my personal space is intruded. I drink but I have friends that don’t. My having a drink doesn’t force them to taste the liquor. A person next to me smoking does force me to inhale the smoke. The two vices are different.

Banning smoking on a city by city or county by county basis is likely to cause smokers to cross boundaries. This is why the state of Missouri should have the courage to ban smoking in public places state wide. If smokers want to cross the river to smoke in Illinois then so be it. Or perhaps then we institute a toll on the bridges?

– Steve

 

Our Lady’s Inn to Sell Virginia Mansion!

April 4, 2005 25th Ward Comments Off on Our Lady’s Inn to Sell Virginia Mansion!

I’ve received word that Our Lady’s Inn will be listing the Virginia Mansion for sale with a brokerage later this week. Rumored sale price is $90K. Once entered in the MLS I will post again with precise details.

 

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe