The two major parties have now nominated their candidates for the general election. Another election between a giant douche and a turd sandwich. But some think the rules governing the presidential debates should be revised so candidates beyond the Republican & Democratic nominees could participate:
In a forum at the University of Minnesota Monday, Stanford professor Larry Diamond and Republican heavyweight Vin Weber made a strong, interesting case for changes to the rules for presidential debates that would make it easier, and perhaps automatic, to expand the cast to at least three candidates in the fall debates.
The current Republican-Democratic duopoly is “embarrassingly undemocratic,” Diamond said, and the fact that the commission that runs the debates is dominated by representatives of the two parties, who have no real interest in expanding the choices presented to the public, “doesn’t pass the smell test” and is “not defensible.”
More voters now identify themselves as independents than as Democrats or Republicans, Weber said. If the two current frontrunners, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, are the major-party nominees, the debate between them would feature two candidates who have higher unfavorable than favorable ratings, he noted. If the only two candidates on the debate stage are Clinton and Trump, a lot of Americans will be wondering why they can’t have other choices, he said. (Minnesota Post: Why we need more than two candidates at presidential debates)
As of 2000, the rules require a 15% polling threshold to participate.
The Democratic convention began in Philadelphia yesterday. The Republican convention wrapped up last Thursday with the nomination of Donald J. Trump and running mate Mike Pence. In a May 2015 Sunday Poll Trump didn’t even male the top 5!
Jeb Bush
TIE: Rand Paul/Marco Rubio
TIE: Dr. Ben Carson/Chris Christy/Rick Perry
But it was early in the race and the list of candidates was too long. Still, the polls here are non-scientific and participation was very low.
In the meantime, a week from today, Missouri has a big primary election. I voted absentee a couple of weeks ago, after researching the races and all the candidates in each, I applied my personal rules for voting:
If only one candidate, skip that office.
Don’t vote for the candidate favored by the political establishment.
Being likely win isn’t a valid reason to vote for or against a candidate.
Don’t dismiss a candidate just because they’ve never been elected to office before.
While I’m not enamored by the DNC, I did take a Democratic ballot.
Here’s how I voted:
US Senate: Cori Bush
US House: Maria Chappelle-Nadal
Gov: Eric Morrison
Lt. Gov: Winston Apple
Secretary of State: MD Rabbi Alam
Attorney General: Teresa Hensley
State Treasurer: Pat Contreras
State Senate: Dylan Hassinger
State Rep: only one candidate — skipped
Circuit Attorney: Patrick Hamacher
Sheriff: Vernon Betts
Treasurer: only one candidate — skipped
5th Ward Committeeman: Rasheen Aldridge
5th Ward Committeewoman: Megan Betts
On the Republican side the ads have been numerous and nasty in several races, I’m looking forward to reviewing the results. And to a break in political commercials for a month or so until the general election ads begin. Thankfully we have Netflix.
The St. Louis Board of Aldermen are on their Summer break, when they return they’ll take up Board Bill 66:
The measure would require a vendor’s license to distribute food, blankets or other goods on city sidewalks or parks — even if those items are being given away. It would also make it illegal to give anything away between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (St. Louis Public Radio)
In the non-scientific Sunday Poll, readers thought Lt Gov Peter Kinder is most likely to win the GOP primary next month:
Q: Which Republican candidate for Missouri Governor do you THINK will win the August 2nd primary?
Peter D. Kinder 16 [38.1%]
TIE 8 19.05%
Catherine Hanaway
John Brunner
TIE 5 [11.9%]
Eric Greitens
Unsure/no opinion
Of the four, Kinder is the only one to have ever won a statewide race. Brunner lost the 2012 primary for U.S. Senate to Todd “Legitimate Rape” Akin, Greitens has never run for public office before. In this poll nobody got a majority of votes, which may happen in the primary as well. An argument in favor of Ranked Choice Voting:
Ranked choice voting (RCV) makes democracy more fair and functional. It works in a variety of contexts. It is a simple change that can have a big impact.
With ranked choice voting, voters can rank as many candidates as they want in order of choice. Candidates do best when they attract a strong core of first-choice support while also reaching out for second and even third choices. When used as an “instant runoff” to elect a single candidate like a mayor or a governor, RCV helps elect a candidate that better reflects the support of a majority of voters. When used as a form of fair representation voting to elect more than one candidate like a city council, state legislature or even Congress, RCV helps to more fairly represent the full spectrum of voters. (FairVote.org)
AARP Livibility Index
The Livability Index scores neighborhoods and communities across the U.S. for the services and amenities that impact your life the most
Built St. Louis
historic architecture of St. Louis, Missouri – mourning the losses, celebrating the survivors.
Geo St. Louis
a guide to geospatial data about the City of St. Louis