Not Quite Half Of Readers Would Support Arch/Park Sales Tax, A Third Oppose
|
If the folks at CityArchRiver plan to get voters to approve a 3/16¢ sales tax with part of the funds paying off bonds for their 2015 project they’ve got their work cut out for them. I think it’s fair to say the readership here is more pro-city than the region at large but not even half of those that voted indicated they’d support such a tax:
Q: Would You Support A 3/16¢ Sales Tax Increase for Parks/Arch?
- Yes, we need to invest in parks and the Arch is a major tourist attraction for the region 67 [49.63%]
- No, sales taxes are too high already 45 [33.33%]
- Maybe 15 [11.11%]
- Other: 7 [5.19%]
- Unsure/No Opinion 1 [0.74%]
Those that answered “maybe” could be the deciding factor on approval, assuming 50% +1 is what’s needed for approval. Here are the other answers that were submitted:
- Not for the current arch ground plan, we need to start over again I’m afraid
- for city parks, yes, National Parks, no
- Not unless it will help pay for removal of the depressed/elevated section of I70
- Yes, but lets also include Jefferson County
- No, not for the current project. Save local funds for metro expansion (N/S Line)
- Only if they got rid of the ridiculous idea of the gondola going across the rive
- yes but only if the bill is expanded to all of the METRO AREA
We’ll see what happens if a tax increase measure is placed on the ballot for voters to decide.
– Steve Patterson