I’ve written numerous times about the importance of the Americans with Act and how it attempts to create environments that are accessible to all. I’d also said I didn’t want to be in a wheelchair while arguing for the rights of those in chairs. Except for time I was sedated and in ICU, I’ve spent nearly two months in a wheelchair. When you cannot walk, the chair represents freedom and mobility. I know that I will walk again — slowly and likely with a cane at first. Ramps, slopes, railings and such will all be important to me for my own personal mobility even when I return to walking.
Over the last month of rehab I’ve met many people who didn’t think they’d end up in wheelchairs, using a cane or walker. Fellow patients have included those injured in car accidents, diabetics, those who fell (causing brain damage leading to mobility issues), others that had strokes, people that got nerve/muscle-damaging infections and so on. While I hope not, please understand that each of you could end up in my same position. Seriously, nobody is immune.
This is why it is so important that we build environments accessible to all. While a person in a wheelchair is unlikely to go to Lowe’s for drywall they may need a new fridge that will be delivered. Or perhaps they just need a new light bulb or a new houseplant? Being regulated to a chair or other device doesn’t reduce the need to function in society.
I prefer to push my own chair rather than have someone else. Doing for myself is very important. Environments that allow me and others to be self-sufficient is a minimum we should provide — especially for tax subsidized projects. The ADA and accessibility should not be an after thought such as at Loughborough Commons. Every new project should start with a pedestrian plan just as you would plan for the circulation of cars.