Celebrating Blog’s 19th Anniversary

 

  Nineteen year ago I started this blog as a distraction from my father’s heart attack and slow recovery. It was late 2004 and social media & video streaming apps didn’t exist yet — or at least not widely available to the general public. Blogs were the newest means of …

Thoughts on NGA West’s Upcoming $10 Million Dollar Landscaping Project

 

  The new NGA West campus , Jefferson & Cass, has been under construction for a few years now. Next NGA West is a large-scale construction project that will build a new facility for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency in St. Louis, Missouri.This $1.7B project is managed by the U.S. Army …

Four Recent Books From Island Press

 

  Book publisher Island Press always impresses me with thoughtful new books written by people working to solve current problems — the subjects are important ones for urbanists and policy makers to be familiar and actively discussing. These four books are presented in the order I received them. ‘Justice and …

New Siteman Cancer Center, Update on my Cancer

 

  This post is about two indirectly related topics: the new Siteman Cancer Center building under construction on the Washington University School of Medicine/BJC campus and an update on my stage 4 kidney cancer. Let’s deal with the latter first. You may have noticed I’ve not posted in three months, …

Recent Articles:

Board of Aldermen Is Two-Sided

 

Two weeks ago I posted from the Board of Aldermen meeting about how their weekly agendas were printed in large type and printed one side only.  Today I’m happy to report that their 13-page agenda is printed two-sided.  Unfortunately they seem to have had a glitch at the copier and a few pages are missing.  The online agenda, however, is correct.

Hopefully in the coming weeks they’ll be able to work out a few kinks and be on the way to a this small but important incremental step toward a more environmentally friendly printing policy.  I want to thank the staff in President Reed’s office for their willingness to take a look at this issue and begin making changes.

Despite Changes, Intersection Next to St. Louis University Still Dangerous

 

IMG_0517.JPGLast month I posted about the intersection of Vandeventer & West Pine where, at the request of Saint Louis University and Grand Center, the pedestrian signals had been turned off and the Vandeventer traffic given a flashing yellow. This left pedestrians coming to/from SLU from the neighborhood or parking lots to the West of Vandeventer were left on their own to find a break in traffic to make their way to the pedestrianized former West Pine on SLU’s campus. To be fair, I don’t think they sought out eliminating the pedestrian signals but that was a consequence of the action to give motorists on Vandeventer the flashing yellow.

Last week the lights were suddenly back to a typical red, yellow, green cycle. Sorta. I’d noticed some odd things with the intersection in the last week and a couple of days ago, right before the Young Democrats meeting a block away, I shot a few video clips to show the problems.

Here is some of what I have observed and that you will see in the rather boring video (5 minutes of watching signals change!):

  • Pressing the pedestrian crossing button from the SW corner does not activate the pedestrian signal. The light is green for roughly 5 seconds — not enough time to safely cross the busy street.
  • Pedestrians I observed do not seem willing to wait for the signals to change.
  • From the NW corner the pedestrian signal button does activate the “walk” signal. This gives all motorists a red light and gives the walk signal across both streets.
  • The walk signal is only on for 5 seconds before switching to “don’t walk.” The total time is 15 seconds. The signal for West Pine switches to green while the pedestrian signal is still flashing “don’t walk.”
  • Only the crossing along the north side is accessible for users of wheelchairs & mobility scooters. While the SW corner has a curb ramp the crosswalk on the east side at SLU leads to a solid curb rather than a ramp.
  • At 3:45 in the video you’ll see a man on the SLU side of Vandeventer press the pedestrian button. He seems impatient and appears to hold the button. I pan to the south to see that part of the intersection and the man crosses during a break in traffic — tired of waiting for the signal to change. It does appear that the button on that corner does activate the pedestrian signal.
  • I did not test the button at the SE corner to see if it would activate the signal. Again, from the SW corner it does not work.
  • Toward the very end (roughly 5:15) you’ll see how the pedestrian signal crossing West Pine stays on “walk” until the moment when the light changes — potentially catching a pedestrian in the intersection when the motorists are given the green. The pedestrian you see walking southbound on Vandeventer is Tim Schoemehl, son of former Mayor & director of Grand Center, Vince Schoemehl.

Here is the video:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8UNBnYBJxQ[/youtube]

Hopefully the city and SLU are planning signal improvements for the intersection, as you can see it is certainly needed.

Some of St. Louis’ Best Architecture is in Public Parks

 

The other day I was at a traffic light behind some cars and managed to snap this photo in Tower Grove Park:
IMG_3679.JPG

This structure, and so many others, throughout the city are one of those things that bring a smile to my face. I generally never stop to appreciate the fine detailing, the quality of the stone or brick work or just the overall pleasing scale. It seems before the advent of many architectural and urban planning theories we managed to build really wonderful spaces.

One day soon I’m going to take 10 minutes out of my day and walk around this building, touch the stone, and simply bask in the beauty it evokes. Weekly I am all over this city so I think taking time to enjoy so much of the beauty we do have will hopefully compensate for so much we’ve lost as well as make up for much of what we are building today. And yes, I am in an exceptionally good mood today…

Paper, Plastic, Your Own or None?

October 3, 2007 Environment 34 Comments
 

Local food magazine Sauce has an interesting article this month on grocery bags — the old paper or plastic debate. I didn’t bring the issue home with me as I like to leave print items for the next person to read (Sauce is a free monthly found at my grocers and restaurants) —- so I’m working off memory of a quick read of the article as it is not available online.

The writer highlighted the increase in reusable shopping bags available at stores, some made from recycled plastic bags. I have examples from nearly every grocery store in town as well as Soulard Market. Of course the usual issues were covered in piece, petroleum going into plastic bags but paper bags being an even greater consumer of resources. Both have issues breaking down in landfills, with plastic bags taking roughly 1,000 years. Energy on recycling was also covered. Alternatives such as the biodegradable bags made from corn and other natural materials found at Local Harvest Grocery were discussed as well. In particular was the roughly ten cents each one of those bags cost relative to the fraction of a penny the conventional plastic bags cost.

As I said, nearly every angle was covered — including bringing your own bags. The author admitted that, like many people, forgetting to bring your own bag is easy to do. I know I’ve certainly gone into a store without my own bags. But I often do the one thing I didn’t see mentioned in the article — purchase the items and not use a bag at all. Sometimes cashiers are totally baffled that I can manage to carry a few simple items without the aid of plastic bag. The more environmentally aware stores, such as Local Harvest, ask if you’d like a bag. They don’t assume a bag with the only choice being material.

Stores like Shop-N-Save are fine too as they don’t bag for you, although they provide plenty of bags for customers. Sometimes I see customers putting only one to two items per bag — many with their own handles such as a plastic bottle of orange juice. Whole Foods gives you a five cent discount for each bag you bring while Trader Joe’s registers you in a drawing.

Basic grocer Aldi’s has the best concept — if you want a bag you need to buy it.  This approach lets customers feel the impact of the cost of bags at each and every purchase.  Bags are not free so why should they be free in stores?  Many Aldi customers bring in bags to reuse or they grab an empty box from stock (made freely available) to carry items.  Do these people have a strong environmental conviction or simply a desire to save some money where they can?  I say it is the latter.

Again I try to bring my own bag or simply carry the items sans bag. Admittedly I too sometimes take a plastic bag but I give myself a very good guilt trip afterwards.  The trick for me is to place reusable bags in an obvious place so they make it back in my scooter.  So when I go into a store I may have forgotten to bring in a bag but I’m usually guaranteed to have a bag in the scooter so I can simply carry the items until I get outside and place them in a bag.  With only a few items, I can often just place those in the seat storage and not worry about a bag at all.  For those of you driving cars this should be much easier — keep a few bags handy in door pockets or between the seats.  The reusable bag left on top the fridge at home is never any good — they need to be convenient.  And when possible, skip the bag altogether.

So what does this all have to do with urban planning?  Well, landfills and solid waste are a very real issue for cities.  And even those all those bags can be recycled, most are not.  Those of us in the city have trash service as part of our city taxes while others in the region pay a monthly/quarterly fee for trash — regardless of the amount of waste they generate.  But what if we had to pay a fee to dispose of each and every item?  Or our trash was based on weight or volume?  But even before those plastic bags make it to the landfill they are often litter.

So what is a city to do?  Well, earlier this year San Francisco took a big step — they banned plastic bags within the city!  From the SF Gate in March 2007:

The city’s Board of Supervisors approved groundbreaking legislation Tuesday to outlaw plastic checkout bags at large supermarkets in about six months and large chain pharmacies in about a year.

The ordinance, sponsored by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, is the first such law in any city in the United States and has been drawing global scrutiny this week.

All over the world there is a movement to ban plastic bags.  Critics of the movement indicate this is a step backwards as economics will mean these stores rely on the use of paper bags which take more energy to produce and require cutting down of trees.  Just like those that predict doom from smoking bans, the reality will be that people adopt and likely will take up the practice of having reusable bags handy.  It won’t happen overnight but we can learn to do without plastic bags.  But I’m not holding my breath on the alderman in the City of St. Louis taking such a progressive step.

Truck Uses Curb Ramp as Entrance To Downtown Surface Parking Lot

 

So I’m at a red light the other day and I scramble to get my camera out of my pocket because I can’t believe what I am witnessing — a massive pickup using the corner curb ramp as an entrance to the large surface parking lot.
truckcorner

Geez, is that really necessary? Maybe it is not a big deal? Would the driver have seen someone in a wheelchair coming out from behind the traffic signal box seen behind the truck’s bed?

With this lot, and so many others, no parking is allowed around them because all the curbs are open for easy access. So despite having virtually unlimited access on the sides this guy has to use the ADA ramp on the corner to access the parking space he wants.

IMG_3493.JPG

After using the corner as the entrance he pulls up a bit further within the lot so he can back into the space. Why he couldn’t have just pulled in using the wide driveway near the front of his truck in the above photo is beyond me. Maybe he felt more like he was driving a truck by driving over something he shouldn’t?

IMG_3494.JPG

He finally manages to back the gargantuan vehicle into a space and a half. I think if people are going to drive these things as personal vehicles they need to learn how to maneuver them better.

IMG_3495.JPG

The parking attendant comes over to collect the money from the guys in the truck — I hope they got extra given the amount of room they took up on the lot. In case you are having trouble seeing it, that would be Missouri plate 843 TX7.

Once the two were nearly out of the truck I went by and made a quick smart-ass comment about using the ramp as an entrance and then I sped away on my scooter. I figured it would take them too long to unpark that big truck to chase me down by that point, plus they had already paid to park. In reality, in this situation, the truck using the corner wasn’t a big deal. It was over in seconds and this time nobody happened to be there on the corner. Had someone been on the corner he probably would have waited or simply used the drives instead.

The real problem is that at 11th and Locust we have a large surface parking lot which is paved right up to the sidewalk — to the point the parking and sidewalk contrast only in that one is concrete (sidewalk) and one is asphalt (parking). At the very least we need some bollards or something around these lots so that the sidewalk is protected from vehicles except where permitted to enter/exit. Just to the North of Washington Avenue we have two small city blocks that are nothing but surface parking right up to the sidewalks. Another there is not even paved — it is gravel. Yes, a gravel lot in a downtown!

We must find a way to change the economic model — this cannot and should not be the highest and best use for this land. Among the options, once explored, is the idea of taxing land and not improvements. Thus, the person with a city block occupied by surface parking pays the same taxes as a person with a building(s) on the same size land. I’m sure this is fraught with all sorts of legal issues — my point is we need to look at alternative models employed in other cities for these vast wastelands where buildings once stood. As bad as all the parking garages are — and we have tons of those — these surface lots are worse.

So where do these fit into downtown planning?  Do we simply wait until the property owner decides to sell or build something?  Do we find some incentives to get the owner to upgrade the surface lot with some bollards, a low brick wall or something to separate the pedestrian from pickup? Do we punish the owner with increasing taxes to the point he breaks and sells the land to a developer?  Can we set minimum parking pricing within the CBD so that the owner can make as much money with fewer cars — leaving room around the edges for an improved buffer?  What about simply suggesting the owner lease the corner to someone for a temporary newsstand like the type you see in NY?

I’m not content just waiting and I doubt our downtown leaders are working on creative solutions.  What are your ideas?

Advertisement



[custom-facebook-feed]

Archives

Categories

Advertisement


Subscribe