I Might Have Ended Up in a Car Dependent Situation
|
When I was in the hospital following my stroke the level that I would recover early on was not known. While I was sedated family and friends discussed where I might end up. A nursing home was an option. One of my brothers though I should go live with him back in my birth town of Oklahoma City so he could attend to my needs. Thankfully my recovery progressed very well and was able to return to my own place in downtown St Louis.
But what about my brother’s place? It features many bedrooms & bathrooms and a predominate 3-car garage. Both of the subdivision’s entrances are gated. It is the complete opposite of my downtown lifestyle.
Using walkscore.com I confirmed what I already knew about his place — it is car dependent. The Walk Score was a low 38 out of 100. Helping it get that high of a score is a grocery store & pharmacy just 0.22 miles as the crow flies. Walking out his front door and looking left you can spot the parking lot lights for the store. Getting there, however, is another thing completely.
A couple of years ago while visiting I walked over there for something. This required a walk through the curving streets of his subdivision and passing all the 3-car garages. The internal sidewalks end at the gate. To leave on foot you must walk through the gate used by motorists. Now out at a busy arterial that has yet to be widened to four lanes you basically end up walking in the drainage ditch as no sidewalks are provided. This route about doubles the distance to the store.
The home where we grew up is not much better getting 45 out of 100. Again zero sidewalks which is not something factored into the scoring. The drive-in theater listed at .99 miles away has been closed for 30+ years. The restaurant about the same distance away is a drive-in! Returning to Oklahoma would not have been an option for me.
My other brother’s place in the Bay Area gets a “somewhat walkable” score of 68 out of 100. I’ve walked with him and his wife while visiting and though it is not the same as being in San Francisco it is pretty decent. They’ve got a nice market reachable by sidewalks and a cute old downtown nearby.
But none of those are home for me. My loft between 16th & 17th gets a “very walkable” 83 out of 100. Put in the address for say the Paul Brown rental lofts at 816 Olive and it gets a rating of “walker’s paradise”, a 100 out of 100! Lumiere Place in Laclede’s Landing gets a 78 out of 100 — still “very walkable” in their rating system. All are downtown but each has a different score.
Walk Score acknowledges their system is not perfect:
We’ll be the first to admit that Walk Score is just an approximation of walkability. There are a number of factors that contribute to walkability that are not part of our algorithm:
Public transit: Good public transit is important for walkable neighborhoods.
Street width and block length: Narrow streets slow down traffic. Short blocks provide more routes to the same destination and make it easier to take a direct route.
Street design: Sidewalks and safe crossings are essential to walkability. Appropriate automobile speeds, trees, and other features also help.
Safety from crime and crashes: How much crime is in the neighborhood? How many traffic accidents are there? Are streets well-lit?
Pedestrian-friendly community design: Are buildings close to the sidewalk with parking in back? Are destinations clustered together?
Topography: Hills can make walking difficult, especially if you’re carrying groceries.
Freeways and bodies of water: Freeways can divide neighborhoods. Swimming is harder than walking.
Weather: In some places it’s just too hot or cold to walk regularly.
Kirkwood’s city hall also gets a “walker’s paradise” score of 100 out of 100 while Manchester’s gets a “somewhat walkable” at 65. Sorry but Manchester Rd at 141 isn’t even remotely walkable. Downtown Kirkwood is a much different feel than 8th & Olive yet they get the same score. Take it all with a grain of salt. It does give you a good glimpse into an area and shows you what is nearby. Density is a good thing — the more goods and services nearby the better. I guess I should develop an urban score rating system?
As the technology advances and they can begin to show a walking distance then places like my brother’s house that is within visual sight of a grocery store but a long walk will see their scores drop in relation to other places that have a good street grid to get you there directly.
I’m just so thankful that I’m home in my very walkable neighborhood and not in my brother’s nice but car dependent home.