Celebrating Blog’s 19th Anniversary

 

  Nineteen year ago I started this blog as a distraction from my father’s heart attack and slow recovery. It was late 2004 and social media & video streaming apps didn’t exist yet — or at least not widely available to the general public. Blogs were the newest means of …

Thoughts on NGA West’s Upcoming $10 Million Dollar Landscaping Project

 

  The new NGA West campus , Jefferson & Cass, has been under construction for a few years now. Next NGA West is a large-scale construction project that will build a new facility for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency in St. Louis, Missouri.This $1.7B project is managed by the U.S. Army …

Four Recent Books From Island Press

 

  Book publisher Island Press always impresses me with thoughtful new books written by people working to solve current problems — the subjects are important ones for urbanists and policy makers to be familiar and actively discussing. These four books are presented in the order I received them. ‘Justice and …

New Siteman Cancer Center, Update on my Cancer

 

  This post is about two indirectly related topics: the new Siteman Cancer Center building under construction on the Washington University School of Medicine/BJC campus and an update on my stage 4 kidney cancer. Let’s deal with the latter first. You may have noticed I’ve not posted in three months, …

Recent Articles:

Century Building SLAPP Suit in Court Today

 

Judge Ohmer today considered two motions in the case alleging two downtown residents of “malicious prosecution.” Marcia Behrendt and Roger Plackemeier were plaintiffs in a number of cases against the players behind the razing of the Century Building and the Old Post Office Project. By coincidence, today is the one-year anniversary of the wrecking ball striking the Century.

After the Century was razed the players: the Missouri Development Finance Board; the Land Clearance Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Louis; NSG Developers LLC; and St. Louis’ U.S. Custom House and Old Post Office Building Associates, L.P. filed their malicious prosecution case against Behrendt and Plackemeier, seeking over a million dollars in damages.

From the Defendant’s Special Motion for Summary Judgement

“Upon information and belief, the Plaintiffs malicious prosecution suit is nothing more than an attempt by the City of St. Louis, the State of Missouri and two developers, Mark Schnuck and Steve Stogel, to punish and intimidate citizens from exercising their constitutional rights to speech, petition, and access to the courts. This suit against citizens whose speech against a government project at public hearings and meetings resulted in the filings of litigation to challenge the project is a SLAPP suit dressed up as a malicious prosecution cause of action.”

Today Judge Ohmer issued a stay in the plaintiff’s request for discovery. Judge Ohmer also heard arguments in the defendant’s motion for Summary Judgement (a form of dismissal). Matthew Ghio, attorney for the defendants, said he does not expect a ruling until sometime next year. Both sides have indicated they will appeal if they lose the motion for Summary Judgement. Thus, the litigation against Behrendt and Plackemeier could last for another couple of years.

– Steve

Patterson & French On KDHX’s Collateral Damage

October 20, 2005 Events/Meetings, Site Info Comments Off on Patterson & French On KDHX’s Collateral Damage
 

This coming Monday, October 24th, Antonio French and myself will appear on KDHX’s ‘Collateral Damage‘ program hosted by DJ Wilson and Fred Hessel. The half hour live radio program will air Monday at 7pm (CST). If you can’t hear the program live you will be able to listen to streaming audio from their website. Collateral Damage is also available in a podcast version for your listening pleasure on your computer or iPod.

So tune in on Monday…

– Steve

St. Louis Likes to Raze Buildings on October 20th

 

One year ago today developers building the unnecessary parking garage in the Old Post Office District began demolishing the Century Building while a judge was considering a temporary restraining order against demolition. Clearly they wanted to damage the building before a TRO was issued. Ultimately the TRO was not issued. It was a very sad day.

Heard on discussion forums on Wednesday evening, 10/20/2004:

The SE corner is getting a good beating, with small pieces coming down for now. The demo guy explained that they are “laying down a base” of small pieces in the street to protect the pavement, then they’ll start giving it bigger hits.

The next day:

I drove downtown at 10:30pm Wednesday night to take a peek at progress, St. Louis style. The southeast corner of the Century’s top floor certainly had Geisman’s signature on it, but the wrecking ball was idle – at least for the half hour I was there. I asked a construction worker what was going on and he said they were just taking a break at that moment, had been delayed while adding another section to the crane, planned on continuing the demo all night long and that it would take about 4 months to complete the job. I wonder if all-nighters, such as this are budgeted for the entire 4 month term or limited to only the wee hours of evenings preceding a judge’s ruling on a petition for a TRO. Does the side opposing the motion for a TRO in this case, gain leverage by rendering the building beyond redemption? Geez, given the issues being heard by a judge concurrently, ! wouldn’t such a blatant and vitriolic action be considered Contempt of Court?

From another on 10/21/2004:

As far as I could tell, the pounding stopped around 2 am. I finally got back to sleep close to 4 am and never heard any destruction noise after that.

The mood for many in the city was low. In time the “establishment” will realize the error of razing the Century Building.

Fast forward to present…

Last night the St. Louis Cardinals lost to the Houston Astros, ending their 2005 season. Demolition will now begin on the old Busch Stadium. Originally they had planned to implode the 40 year old structure but they will instead use more conventional demolition techniques.

When they were discussing imploding the stadium I began a post I was going to title, “Top Ten Buildings I’d Implode Before Busch Stadium.” I didn’t want my work to go to waste so here is the list:

  • 10 – Indoor malls, starting with Westfield “Shopping Towns”
  • 9 – Chesterfield Commons, sprawling strip/big box center in flood plain
  • 8 – St. Louis Marketplace, nearly vacant strip/big box center
  • 7 – Interstate highways in the City of St. Louis (I-44, I-55 and I-70)
  • 6 – Westport Plaza, a make believe city.
  • 5 – A. G. Edwards Complex (link w/strong language)
  • 4 – All parking garages lacking street level retail (quite a few)
  • 3 – Pet Building
  • 2 – Adams Mark Hotel
  • 1 – Gateway One
  • While I like the arches of the “old” stadium I can live without the rest of it. The building to sidewalk relationship is dismal. The new stadium shows more promise from an urban perspective although the whole red brick retro thing is a predictable.

    – Steve

    PS @ 10:45am: It was 11 days later, on October 31, 2004, that I started Urban Review – St. Louis.

    The Failure of St. Louis’ Gateway Mall

     

    For those that don’t know, the Gateway Mall is not a failed downtown shopping mall. That would be St. Louis Centre. The Gateway Mall is a failed grand outdoor space running from the Arch on the East to Union Station on the West.

    Originally envisioned decades ago as a grand green space along the lines of The National Mall in Washington D.C., it has consistently failed to live up to expectations. The reasons for failure are numerous and complicated. As decade after decade past the reason for failure changed.

    Keep in mind that clearance for what would become the Arch grounds didn’t commence in earnest until the early 1940s. Yet, in the decades prior to WWII plans were under way to begin creating a grand boulevard in downtown St. Louis. Early plans focused on Market Street from Tucker (then 12th) West to Grand. Yes, plans show concepts clearing a path all the way from 12th to Grand! Thankfully they only found money to raze 10 blocks from 12th to 22nd.

    So first came the vacant blocks along the North side of Market Street West of 12th. Then one by one blocks between the Civil Courts building and the Old Courthouse were razed. During the same period the adjacent blocks were also raised for banal buildings and parking garages. One-way streets and other mistakes drove the life out of downtown.


    gwm1.jpg

    [Gateway Mall in the 1980s. Gateway One office building and the Morton May amphitheater are not yet constructed. Area is dominated by wide streets, surface parking and lifeless parking garages. Photo courtesy of Robin Ringwald]


    Gateway One, the 1980s office building that was built on the site of old buildings and in the middle of the greenway has received much deserved criticism. It wasn’t until I was reading through many newspaper columns and proposals did I fully understand what happened and why. The politics was ugly. One property owner had the best plan to restore most of his buildings but the call for open space was overwhelming. He lost, confirming the St. Louis tradition for razing buildings on the National Register of Historic Places. I never thought I’d say this but Gateway One is far better than some proposals on the drawing boards.

    At the time the local chapter of the American Institute of Architects did not support the plan that would have preserved the historic buildings. Instead, they supported a plan calling for new buildings along the North half of about 4-5 blocks. The South half of these blocks were to be a walkway. While I would have preferred keeping the historic and no so historic buildings the plan supported by the AIA was not bad. It had the openness and views sought by many while having street level retail in the bases of the new buildings. While people didn’t think so at the time, this plan would have resulted in more pedestrian activity than what we ended up with.

    Each generation over the years has developed a new plan to stimulate the area. All sorts of ideas have been suggested including ice staking, world-class museums, fountains and special paving patterns. Each and every time these schemes have failed to understand one important ingredient…

    People.

    If marketed correctly I could hold a successful event on the ruins of the former Pruitt-Igoe housing complex but that doesn’t mean it will remain active after the event. Same is true downtown. Events draw people for the event. Assuming people will return to a location after the event is the downfall of many schemes to revitalize areas. Pretty plans with decorative paving stones and retro lanterns will continue to fail.



    gwm2.jpg
    [Gateway Mall in the 1980s. Two blocks still retain a few buildings but newer buildings on both sides of the image rob life from the street. Photo courtesy of Robin Ringwald]


    Downtown St. Louis has too much open space.

    Decades of razing buildings for surface parking and gratuitous green space has left too little urban activity. The current ratio of active buildings to open space is too low to sustain a lively downtown during non-event times. Washington Avenue is thriving partially because it feels like an urban street should feel.

    Successful urban open space has lively edges. That is, the surrounding buildings are a haven of activity with lots of people coming and going at all hours. The best way to achieve this constant level of activity is street-level retail. But take a good look at what surrounds the Gateway Mall — parking garages, low activity office towers, and other buildings not adding to the area. Jurors in the middle of the area must leave to find food and beverage. The City Hall entrance facing Market is closed. The Kiel center remains closed.

    The most recent of many plans is the Downtown Now! action plan from 1999. I think it correctly determines the problems the area faces but only offers window dressing for solutions. In some cases I think this plan would worsen things by turning Market Street into one-way Westbound. Thankfully they never found funds to make they recommended changes. To read the Downtown Now! 1.8mb PDF file on the Gateway Mall click here. More information on The Gateway Mall can be found on the St. Louis Parks Department website.

    I’ve got some specific thoughts on the area but I’m going to save those for this weekend when the AIA is holding a design charrette to examine the area. The public is invited to participate in one of two ways. First, by serving on a design team for $10. Second is to view the results at a free Sunday afternoon open house. More information including the program and registration forms at AIA St. Louis.

    This is your chance to participate in the process — don’t let it slip by.

    – Steve

    800 Miles On A Honda Metropolitan Scooter

    October 18, 2005 Environment, Scooters 6 Comments
     

    scoot.jpg

    Tonight marks my first 800 miles on my scooter, not exactly a milestone number but I felt like sharing.

    On October 1st I decided to record the miles on my bike, scooter and car so I could track my useage. In these first 18 days I’ve put a paltry 6 miles on my bicycle, 157 on my car and 308 on the scooter. The scooter represented a full 65% of my miles traveled. The scooter represented 98% of my fun for the same time period.

    I’ve also been keeping detailed records of gas mileage. Right now I am at an average of 89mpg. I’ve noticed that as I have become more comfortable with the scooter I’ve taken busier roads and have been riding at full throttle. Lately I’ve been getting around 85-86mpg.

    Since October 1st I’ve spent only $11.57 on gas for the scooter, including a fill-up earlier today. My total expenditure for gas on the scooter in the little over six weeks that I’ve owned it is a whopping $27.30. Less than thirty bucks for six weeks of fuel! I also filled up my car today and that was over $35.

    I’ve purchased two helmets. First was a half helmet and most recently a 3/4 helmet with face shield for colder weather. Total cost $150. I’ve also had my first routine service which was around $110. A pair of leather gloves was $30. I’m not going to count the new jacket I bought because I needed a new jacket anyway.

    Yes, I am quite pleased with my scooter purchase. As intended it has become my primary means of transportation. If you are considering a scooter for your needs check out my scooter blog at stlscooter.com.

    – Steve

    [Photo by fellow STLSyndicate blogger, Tom Lampe]

    Advertisement



    [custom-facebook-feed]

    Archives

    Categories

    Advertisement


    Subscribe