Body Art in the City
|
My birth state of Oklahoma is finally waking up to reality and allowing legal tattoos, the last state to do so. Oklahoma’s law did not allow “permanent” tattoos but in a fun twist tattoo studios opened up shop stating that laser removal options made tattoos non-permenant and therefore legal. Rather than allow this the state has changed the law and is setting up regulatory guidelines.
Like nearly everywhere else confusion surrounded the practice of tattoos, the artists and the patrons. In St. Louis this has been manifested in a ban in redevelopment areas. Common language is the following:
pawn shops, adult bookstores, x-rated movie houses, massage parlors or health spas, auto and truck dealers (new or used), pinball arcades, pool halls, secondhand or junk shops, tattoo parlors, truck or other equipment rentals requiring outside storage, blood donor facilities, free standing package liquor stores, check cashing centers, any use (except for financial institutions or pharmacies) that utilizes a sales or service window or facility for customers who are in cars, or restaurants that sell products to customers who are in cars or who consume the sold products in cars parked on the restaurant premises, or sell products through a sales window to customers who are in cars or to pedestrians outside the building for immediate consumption by the customer either on or off the premises.
The no sales to customers in cars ban (aka drive-thru), as you might guess, it a good rule in my book. Drive-thru restaurants are simply not urban. Neither are the drive-thru bank & pharmacies that are permitted.
But you just don’t get much more urban than a tattoo studio.
I take personal offense to tattoo “parlors” being lumped together with x-rated movie houses and blood donor facilities. Why a personal offense? Well, I have five tattoos so far. My first was at Iron Age in the loop while one of my more recent tattoos was done at Cheap Trx on South Grand (I was their first paying customer when they opened the tattoo studio, thank you very much). The others were done in San Diego, New York City and San Francisco (at the studio of well known tattoo artist Ed Hardy). For me, the tattoo is a wonderful art form that I embraced not in my impulsive 20s but in my 30s.
KSDK is running an AP story on a new study looking at the demographics of those who get tattoos:
The study, scheduled to appear Monday on the Web site of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, provides perhaps the most in-depth look at tattoos since their popularity exploded in the early 1990s.
The results suggest that 24 percent of Americans between 18 and 50 are tattooed; that’s almost one in four. Two surveys from 2003 suggested just 15 percent to 16 percent of U.S. adults had a tattoo.
“Really, nowadays, the people who don’t have them are becoming the unique ones,” said Chris Keaton, a tattoo artist and president of the Baltimore Tattoo Museum.
But body art is more than just tattoos.
About one in seven people surveyed reported having a piercing anywhere other than in the soft lobe of the ear, according to the study. That total rises to nearly one in three for the 18-to-29 set. Just about half — 48 percent — in that age category had either a tattoo or piercing.
Funny, our city’s redevelopment language doesn’t say anything about body piercing. I guess those with piercings are not as much of a perceived threat as those with tattoos? And yes, I have some piercings as well, all done at Cheap Trx on Grand.
I’ve visited many of the tattoo studios in our region and I know a number of the artists. I have friends with many visible tattoos and they are all productive, contributing citizens. In fact, at least one member of the St. Louis Board of Aldermen has a tattoo. I have also visited tattoo studios in nearly every city I’ve traveled to and more often than not they are part of the area which is considered hip & cool. Banning tattoo studios in large parts of St. Louis sends a message, “we don’t want vibrant areas with a diverse & youthful population.” Not a good way to compete with other regions for the creative class.
The legal and regulated art of the tattoo should not be banned from our redeveloped areas.
Update 6/13/06 @ 7:45am – From MayorSlay.com back in March 2006:
Tattoos have definitely gone legit – and the days when City zoning codes and redevelopment ordinances banned their studios are passing quickly. The most talented practitioners of the art in the City – like David – are booked months in advance. And, yesterday’s den of vice is today’s neighborhood hot spot.
Perhaps Francis is sporting some ink?
– Steve