Celebrating Blog’s 19th Anniversary

 

  Nineteen year ago I started this blog as a distraction from my father’s heart attack and slow recovery. It was late 2004 and social media & video streaming apps didn’t exist yet — or at least not widely available to the general public. Blogs were the newest means of …

Thoughts on NGA West’s Upcoming $10 Million Dollar Landscaping Project

 

  The new NGA West campus , Jefferson & Cass, has been under construction for a few years now. Next NGA West is a large-scale construction project that will build a new facility for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency in St. Louis, Missouri.This $1.7B project is managed by the U.S. Army …

Four Recent Books From Island Press

 

  Book publisher Island Press always impresses me with thoughtful new books written by people working to solve current problems — the subjects are important ones for urbanists and policy makers to be familiar and actively discussing. These four books are presented in the order I received them. ‘Justice and …

New Siteman Cancer Center, Update on my Cancer

 

  This post is about two indirectly related topics: the new Siteman Cancer Center building under construction on the Washington University School of Medicine/BJC campus and an update on my stage 4 kidney cancer. Let’s deal with the latter first. You may have noticed I’ve not posted in three months, …

Recent Articles:

Urbanists Need to Stand Up To Ald. Florida on Future of Grand

 

It seems 15th Ward Alderwoman Jennifer Florida is upset a committee of the Dutchtown South Community Corporation opposed her new pet project, the relocation of a McDonald’s fast food restaurant. Her letter to the DSCC President Brian Bast and copied to the board:

I think it inappropriate for a subcommittee to oppose or support commercial development no South Grand, an area outside of your neighborhood association.

Appropriate process would prescribe a subcommittee making a recommendation to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors would vote to make comment of support or opposition regarding development projects in your area. I assume you did not have the support of your Board. I question your process.

I disagree with your reasoning for opposing the overall development of South Grand. I am enclosing my testimony from the conditional use hearing regarding McDonald’s, February 16, 2006.

Oh, Bravo Ms. Florida. This all sounds good except you are in no position to question anyone’s process. As I reported earlier, Ald. Florida shows up at the committee meeting two days before the hearing on the subject without a site plan on the project. She instead attempts to divert attention to the glorious Southside National Bank project already underway. All the while she actually has a copy of the site plan with her but she doesn’t want to show it because she realizes nobody would be happy. And yet she questions the process of this committee?

The fact is the project was submitted to the city more than a month earlier and she had possession of the drawings. She had sufficient time to present full information to the Dutchtown board, but didn’t. The Board was aware the information would be presented to the committee just two days prior to the public hearing.

As far as being outside the neighborhood association that is technically true — by one city block. Dutchtown’s northern boundary is Chippewa, directly across the street from the current McDonald’s and just one block from the proposed site. The DSCC also serves part of the neighborhood known as Gravois Park — the neighborhood where the new McDonald’s is to be located. This is highly appropriate for Dutchtown to speak up.

What is questionable is the Grand-Oak Hill’s support of the relocated McDonald’s. You see, they’ll end up losing the current problem McDonald’s from their area. Also, one has to wonder how influenced they were in their support since they are heavily reliant on Ald. Florida for their operating funds. We also have to question the testimony of 25th Ward Committeewoman Maggie Lampe. She testified at the hearing about questioning Dutchtown’s process but failed to mention her job is funded by Ald. Florida.

Supporting Documents (PDF) for your review:

  • Dutchtown’s Letter
  • Ald. Florida’s Letter to Dutchtown
  • Ald. Florida’s Testimony at Hearing
  • For a counterpoint to Florida’s testimony please read Ald. Craig Schmid’s testimony from the same hearing.

    The residents in the area oppose a drive-thru restaurant on the site of the old Sears. They are part of the 15th Ward (Florida) and 20th Ward (Schmid). Remember that Schmid’s ward is a mere two blocks from the site and only a block from Dutchtown. Ald. Florida is pushing hard for this project over the objections of her constituents. The fact most of her constituents are near Tower Grove Park and probably are not that involved with this far edge of the ward is often overlooked.

    I ask that everyone reading this site email Jennifer Florida and tell her what you think of a low-density fast-food drive-thru in an urban area. If Florida is not your alderman I suggest you contact your alderman as well and tell them you don’t want them deferring to her on this subject. I also ask that everyone email Aldermanic President James Shrewsbury and Mayor Francis Slay. Until these officials hear from us they will continue with business as usual. Feel free to post the text of your emails in the comments section below for all to read.

    – Steve

    French & Patterson On KDHX Tonight

    March 13, 2006 Media 3 Comments
     

    I will be a guest on KDHX’s Collateral Damage program tonight at 7pm. My friend Antonio French, of PubDef Weekly, will share the guest duties with me. Antonio and I appear as guests each month.

    Collateral Damage is hosted by DJ Wilson and Fred Hessel. Recent installments can be streamed from the website. You can also subscribe to the show through iTunes.

    – Steve

    Election Day for Even Numbered Wards One Year Away

    March 13, 2006 Politics/Policy 5 Comments
     

    [CORRECTION on 3/13/06 @ 8pm – Turns out I was off by a week. The Primary election will be March 6, 2007. It is the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March If you really want to be pro-active you can mark your calendars for March 3, 2009 for the odd numbered wards].

    One year from today, March 613, 2007, voters in the City of St. Louis will go to the polls to elect aldermen in the even numbered wards. Will it be like years past where many incumbents go unchallenged? Or will we urbanists rise up and challenge the status quo?

    I want to see all 14 incumbents challenged for their races. Not that all should be sent packing but our democracy is healthier when more citizens participate. None should be given a free ride for another four years.

    Urbanism should be a major focus in this election. Talking points should include:

  • Adoption of Form-Based Zoning for the entire city.
  • Demolition and Development impact the entire city and legislation should be scrutinized, not deferred.
  • Master Planning for commercial corridors.
  • Strategies for substantially increasing the population of the city.
  • Here are the folks up for election next year:

    Ward 2 – Dionne Flowers

    Ward 4 – O.L. Shelton

    Ward 6 – Lewis E. Reed

    Ward 8 – Stephen Conway

    Ward 10 – Joseph Vollmer (the guy responsible for the upcoming demolition of St. Aloysius)

    Ward 12 – Fred Heitert

    Ward 14 – Stephen Gregali

    Ward 16 – Donna Baringer

    Ward 18 – Terry Kennedy

    Ward 20 – Craig Schmid

    Ward 22 – Jeffrey Boyd

    Ward 24 – William Waterhouse (only recently elected to replace Tom Bauer)

    Ward 26 – Frank Williamson

    Ward 28 – Lyda Krewson

    Please share your thoughts in the comments below.

    – Steve

    An Analysis of Lafayette Walk’s Doors & Transoms

     

    lafayette walk door issue - 02.jpgTwo weeks ago the City’s Preservation Board, in a tediously long meeting, voted to require the developer of the new Lafayette Walk townhouses, Orchard Development, to replace the front door and ‘transoms’ on the units already complete and to make changes going forward.

    I must admit that at first glance I agreed with their decision. In spending some more time looking at this project, other new construction projects, and period buildings I’ve some to a slightly different conclusion.

    Correctly discussed at the meeting was the lack of a proper transom sash. At Lafayette Walk the developer somehow thought they could just insert glass in the frame and do without the sash. Of course, real opening transoms (like the six in my building) all require a sash frame to work. It is part of the look and should have been a no brainer. The staff & board also focused on the lack of thickness of the header frame between the door and where a proper transom should have been.

    Cultural Resources director Kathleen Shea focused on the height of the doors as the other problem. All evening long she asked those speaking the height of their doors. As a result, the Preservation Board voted to require the front doors to be 7ft tall rather than the 6ft 8 in doors that are already in place.

    Looking at the entry to the right it is certainly true the door could be taller without any issues. However, if they also thicken the header and do a proper transom sash the amount of area will be significantly reduced.

    I have an issue with the light area over the window in the eyebrow. Historically this area would be the same color as the window frame. Why this hasn’t been addressed is beyond me. It is possible this area just hasn’t been painted yet…



    lafayette walk door issue - 01.jpgThe building from above includes six units, three with half circle opening like this one. In this case, a taller door would be a horrible mistake as you’d lose the entire view of the transom. So, the first mistake from the Preservation Board was to apply the 7ft door to all openings, including ones like this.

    While we are here at this picture I want you to note a few things that I’ll reference later. The front steps leading to the small front porch rise to the point where you are nearly flush with the interior floor — no step up from the porch to get inside the house. As a result the steps are way above the dividing line between the foundation and brick line.

    One last thing, I’m surprised they are not required to have a “graspable” handrail given the height of the steps above grade. I know I’d want something to hold on if the steps are covered in snow & ice.


    … Continue Reading

    New Website Launched for Northside-Southside Mass Transit Study

     

    A new website has been launched for the Northside-Southside transit study. From the site’s homepage:

    From January 2006 for the next 18 months, this is where you will find the latest information on planning MetroLink and other major transit improvements for the City of St. Louis, Missouri.

    In reality the locally preferred routes selected a few years back were routes through the city to get to both north & south county. Plus, as I’ve said before, I don’t think light rail in the middle of the street is a good urban solution. Check out the site yourself and be sure to use the comment form!

    The site is visually attractive and easy to use. However, it fails to include an RSS feed for updates. Those of us that use feeds to know when a site has been updated must now manually check the site. Not smart!

    Click here to view the new site.

    – Steve

    Advertisement



    [custom-facebook-feed]

    Archives

    Categories

    Advertisement


    Subscribe